On key board handler in linux using c programing - c

I am trying a program in c that controls keyboard handler to blink NUMLOCK & CAPSLOCK LED's as a reaction of ctrl+alt+del push... please help me..

I kinda agree with KP. This is funny...
But if yer serious...
First:
There's a setleds program that might help you get started. It's been around for ages... Try man setleds.
Also, xset can be used (under X-windows) to change leds... (You may have to see which leds are enabled for changing in the X-config file.)
Second:
Detecting ctrl+alt+del is more of an issue as it's flagged specially by init. Look in /etc/inittab or /etc/init/control-alt-delete.conf or someplace like that, and you'll see lines like:
# Trap CTRL-ALT-DELETE
ca::ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -t3 -h now
Or:
# control-alt-delete - emergency keypress handling
#
# This task is run whenever the Control-Alt-Delete key combination is
# pressed. Usually used to shut down the machine.
start on control-alt-delete
exec /sbin/shutdown -r now "Control-Alt-Delete pressed"
So you'd have to disable that... Or simply have it run your keyboard-blink program rather than /sbin/shutdown.
Also, watch out for "Control-Alt-Backspace" -- Many X11 config setups enable this combination to shutdown the X server. (Option "DontZap".)
Third:
Now you need to find a way to pickup the control-alt-delete keypress. It's not impossible, but it may not be as simple as getc(). (The again, I could be wrong...)
Of course, if you don't want your program to have the keyboard focus. If you want this to happen while other programs are running in the foreground with keyboard focus... Well then yer looking at tweaking the kernel or some kernel driver. (Or having inittab run yer program instead of /sbin/shutdown.)
Any way you slice it, this is not a good Hello World type exercise.

Option:
Find the right place to trap Alt+Ctrl+Del and register a handler.
Use the KDGETLED/KDSETLED ioctl on /dev/console to changes the keyboard LEDs.
Good Luck!

Related

Capture QEMU Semihosted I/O

For unit testing purposes, I want to be able to run a bare-metal binary with qemu and capture it's output.
Sample file:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
static void qemu_exit() {
register uint32_t r0 __asm__("r0");
r0 = 0x18;
register uint32_t r1 __asm__("r1");
r1 = 0x20026;
__asm__ volatile("bkpt #0xAB");
}
int main(void) {
puts("This is some example text that I want to capture");
qemu_exit();
return 0;
}
Running with:
qemu-system-gnuarmeclipse --nographic --no-reboot \
--board STM32F4-Discovery --mcu STM32F429ZI \
--semihosting-config enable=on,target=native \
--image <binary>
Displayed to the console is:
QEMU 2.8.0-13 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu) This is some example text that I want to capture
This 'example text' is generated within QEMU and so redirecting stdout to a file does not capture it (only: QEMU 2.8.0-13 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu)). Looking at the available qemu logging options -d help does not offer anything as far as I can see.
EDIT
A hacky solution is to use script to capture terminal session:
script --quiet --command <qemu-shell-script-wrapper>
That's not an upstream QEMU, and 2.8 is also quite old, but hopefully the same things that work with upstream QEMU will work there.
Firstly, assuming you're not actually using the monitor, you can get rid of that part of the output by dropping '--nographic' and instead using '-display none'. (--nographic does a lot of things all at once, including both "no graphical display" and also "default serial output to the terminal, add a QEMU monitor and multiplex the monitor and the serial", among other things. It's convenient if that's what you want but sometimes it's less confusing to specify everything separately.)
Secondly, you say you're using semihosting output but is the guest's stdlib definitely using semihosting for its puts() string output and not serial port (UART) output? The output will come out on the terminal either way but how you tell QEMU to redirect it somewhere else will differ. (I suspect it may be using UART output, because if it were using semihosting output then the redirection of stdout that you tried should have worked.)
If the output from the guest is via the serial port then you can control where it goes using the '-serial' option (most simply, "-serial stdio" to send to stdout, but you can also do more complicated things like sending to files, pipes or TCP sockets.). If it's via semihosting then you can control where it goes using the 'chardev=id' suboption of -semihosting-config.

Why is this PLC TON not getting activated in Studio 5000 v32.11

The timer on Rung 0 should be timing but it is not.
The PLC is online and in live mode and the logic before the timer is true.
This is running on a CompactLogix L16ER.
Take a look at your first picture, the left-most rail of the ladder is not green. It looks like that entire routine is not running.
In your program properties for the program/task your using, go to "Program Properties" then to the "Configuration" Set your main program to the desired program you're trying to use.

How to send Sysrq programmatically over serial and is CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ_SERIAL required

I keep getting the SysRq HELP printout, basically seems i can send over serial the sysrq but it won't accept the next key within 5 seconds ie the command key (b) to reboot.
I need to send the command programmatically over serial console connection to reboot system.
I can reboot the system via echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger and cat /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq is 1 (ie full sysrq is enabled)
But I notice that kernel (2.6.32) image I'm booting with only has CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y and there's no mention of CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ_SERIAL. I'd like to know if that setting is required for 2.6.32 or if it was "assumed enabled" and its only required in new kernels.
According to this, I don't need that in my kernel since it was only added to apparently optionally disable sysrq over serial to prevent unwanted triggers.
Anyway I don't really care if PERL is used or PYTHON or C code with tcsendbreak or any programmatic method to send alt-sysrq-b over /dev/ttyUSB0 to reboot linux over serial. So far all i can do is send break sequence and see output of:
SysRq : HELP : loglevel(0-9) reBoot Crash terminate-all-tasks(E) memory-full-oom
l-active-cpus(L) show-memory-usage(M) nice-all-RT-tasks(N) powerOff show-registe
-blocked-tasks(W)
But the command key sent afterward never does anything. So I'm not sure what's wrong. FYI, the system I'm trying to send sysrq over serial to is an embedded linux system that boots via uboot with uimage and dtb file.
Instead of using a break signal I would prefer a technique where the code actually sends the Alt-SysRq-b keyboard keys over the serial console connection.

esp32 printf channel through uart (esp-idf)

I try to disable all logs on my program,
I did disable esp logs
but when I use printf in my channel and open make monitor
printf still works.
how and why?
I want to disable it.
The system logs and printf are two different things over here. In your project sdkconfig file check if the parameter 'CONFIG_CONSOLE_UART_DEFAULT' is set.
This defines where all your console outputs are dumped into.
In your case you want to disable all the printf logs, you can try setting 'CONFIG_CONSOLE_UART_NONE=y'.
If you are doing it thourgh make menuconfig of esp-idf, it will come under - component config > ESP32-Specific > UART for console output (Default: UART0, TX=GPIO1, RX=GPIO3) > None
Hope I answered to your question. :)

generating trap/segfault messages in dmesg

I had a program that was segfaulting.
When I went to investigate and ran dmesg I could see lines like this:
[955.915050] traps: foo_bar[123] general protection ip:7f5fcc2d4306 sp:7ffd9e5868b8 ...
Now the program has been fixed and I'm trying to write some analysis scripts across different systems to find similar messages and was hoping to induce a line in the dmesg log to get a baseline for what to look for and see if there's a difference between, say, a sigbus(10) and a sigill(4)
I tried to do it via kill -11 on the command line . No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via signal(getpid(), 11) in the code. No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via signal 11 after attaching in gdb . No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via writing bad code and it worked for SEGV, but I can't figure out how to trigger a SIGBUS (for example)
I'm guessing that there is more than one path for handling the signal depending on how it occurs and my attempts above just aren't doing it the right way.
How can I trigger/send a signal to my program that'll get a line in dmesg? Is there some kernel or log configuration I can twiddle to get those lines?
Update:
" __builtin_trap: when to use it? " shows how to get a SIGILL but alas doesn't have a signal-agnostic solution)

Resources