I have a service hosted in a WPF application with an async method with the Begin/end methods, and when I catch an exception in the service, I want to throw a faultException to warn to the client.
However, when I try to throw the faultException, the host application crash, shutdown suddenly.
In my repository, I catch the UpdateException, then, I create a custom exception, UniqueKeyException, that is throw to the caller. The caller is an auxiliar method that is called in the Begin method.
This auxiliar method, catch the UniqyeKeyException and only do a "throw", that is capture in the try/catch block of my end method. Here there is something that I don't understand, why in the end mehod this exception is catched in the block of AgregateException instead of the UniqueKeyException.
Well, anyway, in the catch block of the end method, in the AgregateException block, I check if the innerException is UniqueKeyException, if it is true, I create an object UniqueKeyArgs (a custom class with the information to send to the client), create a FaultException and finally do the throw FaultException. It is in this step, the throw, where the host application crash.
I think that I have all configure correctly, because my custom class UniqueKeyArgs is decorate as Datacontract and its properties as DataMember, in the app.config of my host application I configure the behavior to include exception details and in the contract I decorate it with faultContract.
Why the application crash?
My code is the following:
REPOSITORY
public List<Usuers> updateUsers(List<Users> paramUsers)
{
....
catch(UpdateException ex)
{
SqlException innerEx = (SqlException)ex.InnerException;
//Code 2627 is Unique Key exception from SQL Server.
if (innerEx != null && innerEx.Number == 2627)
{
//I create the conditions of searching
ConditionsUsers conditions = new conditions();
conditions.UserName = (Users)ex.StateEntries[0].Entity).userName;
//Search for the existing user
Users myUser = getUser(conditions);
string message = "the user " + conditions.userName + " exists.";
throw new UniqueKeyException(message, myUser);
}
throw;
}
SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION
//This is my auxiliar method, called in the Begin method.
private submitUpdates()
{
....
catch(UniqueKeyException ex)
{
//The code enter here
throw;
}
}
public IAsyncResult BeginUpdateUsers(List<users> paramUsers, AsyncCallback callback, object state)
{
Task<List<Users>> myTask= Task<List<Users>>.Factory.StartNew(p => sumbmitUpdates(paramUsers), state);
return myTask.ContinueWith(res => callback(myTask));
}
public List<Users> EndUpdateusers(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
return ((Task<List<Users>>)result).Result;
}
//Why agregateException and not is catched in the UniqueKeyException ???
catch(AgregateException ex)
{
if (innerExceptions[0] is UsuariosValorUnicoException)
{
//I assign manually the data to debug, to discard other problems.
Users myUser = new Users();
myUser.UserName = "Jhon";
myUser.Password = "pass123";
UniqueKeyArgs myArgs = new UniqueUserArgs("unique key error", myUser);
FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs> myException = new FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs>(myArgs);
//Crash here, in the throw myException
throw myException;
}
}
throw;
}
MY CONTRACT
[FaultContract(typeof(UniqueKeyArgs))]
IAsyncResult BeginUpdateUsers(List<Users> paramUser, AsyncCallback callback, object state);
List<Users> EndUpdateUsers(IAsyncResult result);
Crash when I throw myException in the End method.
I see in this post that the solution is catch the exception in the host application too, not only in the service object. However, this solution uses Application.ThreadException, that belong to System.Windows.Forms namespace, and I am using a WPF application.
How could I send the exception to the client from a service hosted in a WPF application?
Thanks.
EDIT1: well, I am use a try/catch block in the line where I throw the exception and I see that the error is that I have not indicated a reason, so when I create my FaultException I do:
FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs> myException = new FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs>(myArgs, new FaultReason("DummyReason");
In this case, the exception message is "DummyReason", the message that I set in the FaultReason, so it says me nothing. The FaultException is not throw, and throw the generic exception to the client.
In this case the host application does not shutdown, but close the connection with the client and I have to reconnect.
It seems that the problem is the creaton of the FaultException, but I don't see the problem.
#Roeal suggests that perhaps is only possible to use faultException with synch methods, but in this link I can see an example in which is used with async methods. I have seen others examples, is not the unique.
Thanks.
EDIT2: I solve my problem. My problem is that in the FaultException, T is an object that have a property that was a self tracking entity, and this is a problem, if I am not wrong, I only can use basic types as properties of the exception.
Then, in the exception, I have implmemented ISerialize. It's needed to be able to send the information to the client, without this, the client receives an exception.Detail with null properties.
Did you also declare the synchronous operation in your service contract? In that case, maybe this helps:
If fault contracts are defined on the service operation contract, the FaultContract attribute should be applied only on the synchronous operations.
-- Juval Lowy, "Programming WCF Services 3rd Edition" (p456)
I solve my problem. My problem is that in the FaultException, T is an object that have a property that was a self tracking entity, and this is a problem, if I am not wrong, I only can use basic types as properties of the exception.
Then, in the exception, I have implmemented ISerialize. It's needed to be able to send the information to the client, without this, the client receives an exception.Detail with null properties.
I realise that similar questions have been asked before however none of the solutions provided worked.
Examining the token returned from the BeginGetResponse method I see that the following exception is thrown there:
'token.AsyncWaitHandle' threw an exception of type 'System.NotSupportedException'
This page tells me that this exception means the Callback parameter is Nothing, however I'm passing the callback - and the debugger breaks into the callback method when I insert a breakpoint. However the request object in the callback is always null. I can view the same exception detail in the result object in the callback method.
I've tried using new AsyncCallback(ProcessResponse) when calling BeginGetResponse
I've tried adding request.AllowReadStreamBuffering = true;
I've tried this in-emulator and on-device, with no luck on either.
public static void GetQuakes(int numDays)
{
HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("http://magma.geonet.org.nz/services/quake/geojson/quake?numberDays=" + numDays);
// Examining this token reveals the exception.
var token = request.BeginGetResponse(ProcessResponse, request);
}
static void ProcessResponse(IAsyncResult result)
{
HttpWebRequest request = result.AsyncState as HttpWebRequest;
if (request != null)
{
// do stuff...
}
}
So I'm at a bit of a loss as to where to look next.
'token.AsyncWaitHandle' threw an exception of type
'System.NotSupportedException'
This page tells me that this exception means the Callback parameter is
Nothing
The documentation you are looking at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.httpwebrequest.begingetresponse%28v=vs.95%29.aspx is for BeginGetResponse. Silverlight does not use the AsyncWaitHandle, and correctly throws a NotSupportedException. You are seeing the exception System.NotSupportedException is for call to IAsyncResult.AsyncWaitHandle you are making when you inspect token.
The documentation on IAsyncResult.AsyncWaitHandle says explicitly that it is up to the implementation of IAsyncResult whether they create a wait handle http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.iasyncresult.asyncwaithandle(v=vs.95).aspx. Worrying about this is sending you down th wrong path.
I think you need to descibe the actual problem you are seeing. It is great to know what you have investigated, but in this case it does help resolve the problem.
The code should work and in ProcessResponse request should not be null when you test it in the if statement. I just copied the code you have provided into a windows phone application and ran it with no problems.
I have a problem using "fire()" with a GWT RequestFactory after I've used it to unfreeze and edit a proxy.
If I have two request factory objects and their associated contexts like this:
private SyntheticRequest req1 = requestFactory.someRequest();
private Request<xProxy> sendRequest1 = req1.something();
private SyntheticRequest req2 = requestFactory.someRequest();
private Request<xProxy> sendRequest2 = req2.something();
using "fire()" on the first request works fine:
sendRequest1.fire(new Receiver<xProxy>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(xProxy response) {
...
if (somethingIsTrue){
xProxy x = req2.edit(response); //<-- **I think this causes a problem later, although the proxy "x" works as expected here.**
x.setSomething("something");
update();
}
});
that part runs ok because I get to the "onSuccess". But when this one runs "update()", which looks like this:
private void update(){
sendRequest2.fire(new Receiver<xProxy>(){
...onFailure...
...onSuccess...
});
}
sendRequest2 always fails, with the error
Server Error Index:0 Size:0
and I put a breakpoint in the code for the "something()" service and it never even gets to that code! There must be something about the "req2.edit()" that hurts req2 and sendRequest2, but what?
Thanks.
what is 'b'? the line xProxy x = req2.edit(b); is the first time it's mentioned? is it supposed to be xProxy x = req2.edit(response);
Anyway.. that is not the problem..
'Server Error' indicates that RequestFactory caught an exception during the processing of a request, server-side. Something (but maybe not something()) is throwing an IndexOutOfBounds exception.
If you have a look at RequestFactoryServlet.java (which you can replace with your own very easily btw) you can see it setting up a try catch block that catches all exceptions when processing a request. It passes them to 'DefaultExceptionHandler' which wraps them in a ServerFailure, and that gets returned to you GWT code as an onFailure() call.
An easy way to find where the exception is being thrown is set a breakpoint on IndexOutOfBoundsException, making sure to catch 'caught' exceptions as well as uncaught.
I have a problem which seems really strange to me! I am working with java mail api in some POJOs and servlets/jsps running on an embedded Jetty server. The problem is that after I retrieve all the folders, but when trying to cast an individual folder from Folder type to IMAPFolder type, this fails.
The strangest thing is that my JUnit tests work just fine the folder is casted and all the messages are retrieved. However, when running the application, it failed.
I just have the error message
500 ([Lcom.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage; cannot be cast to [Lcom.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage;)
The code is simple:
//...
for(Folder fl:mailFolders){
try {
if((fl.getType() & Folder.HOLDS_MESSAGES) != 0){
Folder f = fetch.connectToInbox(st, fl.getFullName());
fetch.processAllMessages(f);
}
} catch (MessagingException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
//.. }
public synchronized void processAllMessages(Folder fldr){
IMAPFolder fl = (IMAPFolder) fldr ;
}
Can anyone please help me?
You've got two copies of the JavaMail classes available to your application and they're being loaded by different class loaders, which is why you're getting the strange exception.
I've got a Silverlight enabled WCF web service set up and I'm connecting to it from my Silverlight application.
The Service is not written using the ASync pattern but Silverlight generates the async methods automatically.
I have a method that within my service that has a chance of throwing an exception I can catch this exception but I'm not sure of the best way of handling this exception, I've noticed that the event args of the completed method contain an error property.
Is is possible to set the value of this error property?
Example Method
public class service
{
[OperationContract]
public Stream getData(string filename)
{
string filepath = HostingEnvironment.MapPath(filename);
FileInfo fi = new FileInfo(filenpath);
try
{
Stream s = fi.Open(FileMode.Open);
return s;
}
catch (IOException e)
{
return null;
}
}
}
Silverlight Code
btnFoo_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
ServiceClient svc = new ServiceClient();
svc.getDataCompleted += new EventHandler<getDataCompletedEventArgs>(getData_Completed);
svc.getDataAsync("text.txt");
}
void getData_Completed(object sender, getDataCompletedEventArgs e)
{
e.Error //how can i set this value on the service?
}
Finally if the service is offline or times out is there anyway to catch this exception before it reaches the UnhandledException method within App.xaml?
Thanks
Since silverlight is using services asyncronously you dont get a synchronous exception throw, but instead it is stored in e.Error property, that you need to check in your ServiceCallCompleted method.
To answer your question
how can i set this value on the service?
Simply throw an exception on server and it can be enough given several other conditions.
You may want to introduce FaultContract on your WCF service method, and throw FaultException<T> which is a common way to deal with errors in WCF.
However fault result in return code 500 and silverlight won't be able to get response with such status code and have access to Fault object, even if you add that attribute to service.
This can be solved using several approaches.
Use the alternative client HTTP stack: You can register an alternative HTTP stack by using the RegisterPrefix method. See below for an outline of how to do this. Silverlight 4 provides the option of using a client HTTP stack which, unlike the default browser HTTP stack, allows you to process SOAP-compliant fault messages. However, a potential problem of switching to the alternative HTTP stack is that information stored by the browser (such as authentication cookies) will no longer be available to Silverlight, and thus certain scenarios involving secure services might stop working, or require additional code to work.
Modify the HTTP status code: You can modify your service to return SOAP faults with an HTTP status code of 200, Silverlight 4 so that faults will be processed successfully. How to do this is outlined below. Note that this will make the service non-compliant with the SOAP protocol, because SOAP requires a response code in the 400 or 500 range for faults. If the service is a WCF service, you can create an endpoint behavior that plugs in a message inspector that changes the status code to 200. Then you can create an endpoint specifically for Silverlight consumption, and apply the behavior there. Your other endpoints will still remain SOAP-compliant.
Faults in silverlight
Creating and Handling Faults in Silverlight
OR
[DataContract]
public class MyError
{
[DataMember]
public string Code { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Message { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public DateTime Time { get; set; }
}
public class service
{
[OperationContract]
public Stream getData(string filename, out MyError myError)
{
myError = null;
string filepath = HostingEnvironment.MapPath(filename);
FileInfo fi = new FileInfo(filenpath);
try
{
Stream s = fi.Open(FileMode.Open);
return s;
}
catch (IOException e)
{
myError = new MyError() { Code = "000", Message = ex.Message, Time = DateTime.Now };
return null;
}
}
}
I wish successful projects