First of all its not a splash-screen what i want... just to be clear... ok... lets go to the description of the problem:
i have a form that fire N number of threads (i dont know how many, the user must choose)... each thread has a object, and during several moments the objects may fire a event to signal some change... there must be a form for each thread to "report" the messages that the events are sending...
my problem is: the threads create the forms perfectally... but the desappear... out of nowhere... they appear on the screen... and vanish... poof.... gone! how can i avoid that undesired "disposing"?!?!
Your threads must either
use proper InvokeRequired + Invoke logic
or run their own MessagePump (Application.Run)
Which one did you (not) do?
If you create a form in a thread, the form will vanish when the thread is done. If you want the form to survive longer than that you need to either keep the thread alive, or create the form on the application's main thread. The latter would be preferable. Just make sure that each to hook up event listener for the object in the corresponding form, and use Invoke or BeginInvoke as needed when updating the form.
A simple example:
First a worker:
class Worker
{
public event EventHandler SomethingHappened;
protected void OnSomethingHappened(EventArgs e)
{
var evnt = SomethingHappened;
if (evnt != null)
{
evnt(this, e);
}
}
public void Work()
{
// do lots of work, occasionally calling
// OnSomethingHappened
}
}
Then, in a form we have an event handler for the SomethingHappened event:
public void SomethingHappenedHandler(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (this.InvokeRequired)
{
this.Invoke(new Action(() => SomethingHappenedHandler(sender, e)));
return;
}
// update gui here
}
Then it's really just a matter of wiring it all together:
Worker w = new Worker();
ProgressForm f = new ProgressForm;
w.SomethingHappened += f.SomethingHappenedHandler;
f.Show();
Thread t = new Thread(w.Work);
t.Start();
Disclaimer: this sample is quickly tossed together and somewhat untested (sitting on the train, about to get off ;) ).
A Form must be hosted on a thread with a message loop. You can create a message loop by either calling Application.Run or Form.ShowDialog. However, unless you have really good reason for doing so I would avoid having more than one thread with a windows message loop.
I would also avoid creating N threads. There are better ways to parallelize N operations other than creating one thread per operation. To name only two: 1) queue a work item in the ThreadPool or 2) use the Task Parallel Library via the Task class. The problem with creating N threads is that each thread consumes a certain amount of resources. More threads means more resources will be consumed and more context switching will occur. More is not always better in the world of multithreading.
Related
I have a class that handles some realtime action in a thread that it starts. There are other theads in play in this application as it is very complex. When This rt action starts i need to pop up a window and close it when it is done. Sounds easy.
There are events that I hook to when this action starts and stops. In those event handlers I place the code:
private void Voice_SpeakStarted(object sender, TMSpeakStartedEventArgs e)
{
InfoWindow = new Form();
InfoWindow.Show();
}
/// <summary>
/// this is the event handler speaking stops
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender"></param>
/// <param name="e"></param>
private void Voice_SpeakCompleted(object sender, TMSpeakCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (InfoWindow.InvokeRequired)
{
InfoWindow.Invoke(new Action(() =>
{
InfoWindow.Close();
}));
InfoWindow.Hide();
}
}
There are times I get an error that the thread has terminated. (An error occurred invoking the method. The destination thread no longer exists.)
I always seem to get the window to show. I can not seem to get the window to close.
I also see that sometime the handler themselves do not get called.
I need help bad. I can post more code if it would be helpful.
Edited - added more code
This is how I start the class
public void start()
{
//It's already alive, nothing to do
if (alive) return;
//Make sure this is the only place where alive is set to true
alive = true;
Voice.SpeakCompleted += new Speech.TMSpeakCompletedDelegate(Voice_SpeakCompleted);
Voice.SpeakStarted += new Speech.TMSpeakStartedDelegate(Voice_SpeakStarted);
dispatch = new Thread(new ThreadStart(ProcessSayList));
dispatch.Start();
}
The constructor of the class is
public AnimationControl(dynamic parent)
{
Parent = parent;
Voice = new Speech();
q = Queue.Synchronized(new Queue(1000));
start();
}
You should really specialize your thread and stop calling code managed by other thread form any thread. Use message queues to communicate actions to your thread. This is the safest way to do multi-threading.
Example in pseudo-code:
Thread1
{
while (1)
{
read my last message in my queue;
do something according to this message like:
openwindow();
or closewindow();
}
}
Thread2
{
My life is short, I just need to post a message to thread1
}
Thread3
{
etc.
}
There are ready-to-use structures for such a thing on every system. And by doing so, it will be much more easy to understand what's happening in case of problem like that. Of course, if you don't take care, your threaded program can become absolutely linear; the goal is to make sure some parts of actions can be made in parallel and do not create a chain of threads waiting each other, one by one :)
Check my answer here for some information on the thread terminated error, and UI threading in general: understanding InvalidAsynchronousStateException occurrences
Well for one thing you're calling Hide on your window on the wrong thread even if InvokeRequired returns true.
I can also guess that you're creating your Voice instance on a new thread and returning when you get a "close" message, thus sometimes killing the thread you're trying to route windows messages through. Consider holding on to the thread until your window is actually closed.
And yes, you should post more code, there isn't a single line of code that shows how you create/dispose of that thread.
I am creating a quick'n'dirty utility that will enable editing of data read sequentially from a set of files. Here's a very simplified explanation of what will happen in a single iteration of a loop:
Read a line from the input stream
Parse it and use the parsed results to populate form controls
Allow user editing and await a confirmation button click
Retrieve the updated form control values and write to the output stream
What I can't figure out is how to integrate the processing loop with the event-driven UI. For example, how do I suspend operation of the loop while waiting for user input.
I understand that this is possible by launching the loop operation on its own thread and writing code to manage its interaction with the UI thread, but I am wondering if there is a simpler approach that works out of the box.
Thanks for any ideas you may be able to offer.
Tim
I can think of 2 approaches to do that:
The easiest is probably to use a modal dialog: when your worker thread needs input from the user, display a dialog, which is a blocking operation. Something like that:
// Worker thread loop
while(...)
{
...
// prompt user for data (invoke synchronously on UI thread)
UserData data = (UserData)window.Invoke(PromptUserData);
...
}
...
UserData PromptUserData()
{
UserInputDialog dlg = new UserInputDialog();
dlg.ShowDialog();
return dlg.UserData;
}
The other option, if you don't want to use a modal dialog, is to use a wait handle to synchronize the worker thread and the UI:
private readonly AutoResetWaitHandle _userInputWaitHandle = new AutoResetWaitHandle(false);
...
// Worker thread loop
while(...)
{
...
// Setup the UI to allow user input
window.Invoke(SetupUIForInput);
// Wait for the input to be validated
_userInputWaitHandle.WaitOne();
...
}
...
void SetupUIForInput()
{
// Enable the UI
inputForm.Enabled = true;
// Whatever else you need to do...
...
}
void buttonOK_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Signal the worker thread to continue
_userInputWaitHandle.Set();
}
You wouldn't really implement a loop in the narrow sense.
You would do something like this (pseudo code):
OnStartOperationButtonClick()
{
if(!ReadLine())
return;
ParseLineAndPopulateControls();
ShowEditingControls();
}
OnConfirmationButtonClick()
{
GetControlValuesAndWriteToOutputStream();
if(!ReadLine())
{
HideEditingControls();
return;
}
ParseLineAndPopulateControls();
}
No need for a separate thread, given that reading and parsing the line doesn't take long.
I am trying to reuse some .NET code that performs some calls to a data-access-layer type service. I have managed to package up both the input to the method and the output from the method, but unfortunately the service is called from inside code that I really don't want to rewrite in order to be asynchronous.
Unfortunately, the webservice code generated in Silverlight only produces asynchronous methods, so I was wondering if anyone had working code that managed to work around this?
Note: I don't need to execute the main code path here on the UI thread, but the code in question will expect that calls it makes to the data access layers are synchronous in nature, but the entire job can be mainly executing on a background thread.
I tried the recipe found here: The Easy Way To Synchronously Call WCF Services In Silverlight, but unfortunately it times out and never completes the call.
Or rather, what seems to happen is that the completed event handler is called, but only after the method returns. I am suspecting that the event handler is called from a dispatcher or similar, and since I'm blocking the main thread here, it never completes until the code is actually back into the GUI loop.
Or something like that.
Here's my own version that I wrote before I found the above recipe, but it suffers from the same problem:
public static object ExecuteRequestOnServer(Type dalInterfaceType, string methodName, object[] arguments)
{
string securityToken = "DUMMYTOKEN";
string input = "DUMMYINPUT";
object result = null;
Exception resultException = null;
object evtLock = new object();
var evt = new System.Threading.ManualResetEvent(false);
try
{
var client = new MinGatServices.DataAccessLayerServiceSoapClient();
client.ExecuteRequestCompleted += (s, e) =>
{
resultException = e.Error;
result = e.Result;
lock (evtLock)
{
if (evt != null)
evt.Set();
}
};
client.ExecuteRequestAsync(securityToken, input);
try
{
var didComplete = evt.WaitOne(10000);
if (!didComplete)
throw new TimeoutException("A data access layer web service request timed out (" + dalInterfaceType.Name + "." + methodName + ")");
}
finally
{
client.CloseAsync();
}
}
finally
{
lock (evtLock)
{
evt.Close();
evt = null;
}
}
if (resultException != null)
throw resultException;
else
return result;
}
Basically, both recipes does this:
Set up a ManualResetEvent
Hook into the Completed event
The event handler grabs the result from the service call, and signals the event
The main thread now starts the web service call asynchronously
It then waits for the event to become signalled
However, the event handler is not called until the method above has returned, hence my code that checks for evt != null and such, to avoid TargetInvocationException from killing my program after the method has timed out.
Does anyone know:
... if it is possible at all in Silverlight 3
... what I have done wrong above?
I suspect that the MinGatServices thingy is trying to be helpful by ensuring the ExecuteRequestCompleted is dispatched on the main UI thread.
I also suspect that your code is already executing on the main UI thread which you have blocked. Never block the UI thread in Silverlight, if you need to block the UI use something like the BusyIndicator control.
The knee-jerk answer is "code asynchronously" but that doesn't satisfy your question's requirement.
One possible solution that may be less troublesome is to start the whole chunk of code from whatever user action invokes it on a different thread, using say the BackgroundWorker.
Of course the MinGatServices might be ensuring the callback occurs on the same thread that executed ExecuteRequestAsync in which case you'll need to get that to run on a different thread (jumping back to the UI thread would be acceptable):-
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => client.ExecuteRequestAsync(securityToken, input));
I have a windows form on the main thread and another thread that does some calculations. I'd like to update the status bar on my form from the work being done in the other thread. What's the best way to do this?
So far everything I've tried just makes things run really slowly. I'm using Visual Studio 2005.
You can use the marshaling techniques like Control.Invoke to execute a delegate on the UI thread where UI elements can be safely manipulated, but that approach is not very good. Actually, it is a terrible approach if all you want to do is update simple progress information.
By far the best method for doing this is:
Have your worker thread publish progress information to a shared variable.
Have your UI thread poll for it via a System.Windows.Forms.Timers on an interval that works well for you.
Here is what it might look like.
public class Example : Form
{
private volatile int percentComplete = 0;
private void StartThreadButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
StatusBarUpdateTimer.Enabled = true;
new Thread(
() =>
{
for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
{
DoSomeWork();
percentComplete = i;
}
}).Start();
}
private void StatusBarUpdateTimer_Tick(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
yourStatusBarPanel.Text = percentComplete.ToString() + "%";
StatusBarUpdateTimer.Enabled = percentComplete < 100;
}
}
This works well because:
The percentComplete field is declared 'volatile' ensuring its value can be reliably read from multiple threads.
The UI thread gets to dictate when and how often the UI gets updated...the way it should be!
The worker thread does not have to wait for a response from the UI thread before it can proceed as would be the case with Invoke.
It breaks the tight coupling between the UI and worker threads that Invoke would impose.
It is more efficient...considerably.
You get more throughput on both the UI and worker threads.
There is no chance of saturating the UI message queue as could be the case with BeginInvoke.
You do not have to litter you code with Invoke calls everytime you need to update the UI from the worker thread.
Make sure that you only update the user interface from the main thread or else you will have problems. You can switch your thread context by calling Invoke. There's a good post here on that.
You can send messages to the main thread and get it to update the progress bar, although you then need to check for the messages. You could also do the same sort of thing as a polling function.
What is the best way to update a label on a Windows Forms application while processing?
I have a loop that does some processing to files on the user's system when the user clicks a button.
foreach (System.IO.FileInfo f in dir.GetFiles("*.txt"))
{
// Do processing
// Show progress bar
// Update Label on Form, "f.Name is done processing, now processing..."
}
What would be some sample code?
What exactly is this called? Is it threading or delegates?
A quick fix for you would be:
Label1.Text = f.Name + " is done processing, now processing...";
Label1.Refresh();
You really want to avoid DoEvents, otherwise you'll have problems if your user repeatedly presses buttons on your form.
You should be doing this on another thread, and then updating your UI thread from that thread. You are blocking further processing by performing this work on the UI thread.
If you can't move this code to the UI thread, then you could always call Application.DoEvents, but I strongly suggest you explore these options first:
System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker
System.Threading.ThreadPool
System.Threading.Thread
System.Threading.Tasks namespace
You'll need to get your data from one thread to the other. This can be done in a couple of ways...
First, your "background" thread could update some kind of "CurrentStatus" string variable that it changes as it goes along. You could then put a timer on your form that would then grab the CurrentStatus variable and update the label with it.
Second, you could simply invoke the operation from the background thread to the UI thread with a delegate using the InvokeRequired property of the label control. So for example...
private delegate void UpdateStatusDelegate(string status);
private void UpdateStatus(string status)
{
if (this.label1.InvokeRequired)
{
this.Invoke(new UpdateStatusDelegate(this.UpdateStatus), new object[] { status });
return;
}
this.label1.Text = status;
}
You can call that UpdateStatus() method from any thread (UI or background), and it will detect whether or not it needs to invoke the operation on the main UI thread (and if so, does it).
To actually set up the thread, you can do so like this:
private void StartProcessing()
{
System.Threading.Thread procThread = new System.Threading.Thread(this.Process);
procThread.Start();
}
private void Process() // This is the actual method of the thread
{
foreach (System.IO.FileInfo f in dir.GetFiles("*.txt"))
{
// Do processing
// Show progress bar
// Update Label on Form, "f.Name is done processing, now processing..."
UpdateStatus("Processing " + f.Name + "...");
}
}
Then when the user clicks the "GO" button you'll simply call StartProcessing().
If your processing is lengthy do it in a backgroundworker thread.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.backgroundworker.aspx
I also recommend to use :
Application.DoEvents();
Processes all Windows messages currently in the message queue.