Programmatically create ItemsPanelTemplate for Silverlight ComboBox? - silverlight

I am trying to create a Blend behavior related to ComboBoxes. In order to get the effect I want, the ItemsPanel of the ComboBox has to have a certain element added to it. I don't want to do this in every ComboBox that uses the behavior, so I want the Behavior to be able to inject the ItemsPanelTemplate programmatically. However, I can't seem to find a way to do this. ItemsPanelTemplate does not seem to have a property/method that lets me set the visual tree. WPF ItemsPanelTemplate has the VisualTree but Silverlight does not.
Basically, what is the programmatic equivalent of this XAML?
<ComboBox>
<ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
</ComboBox>
Edit:
Okay apparently that is not an easy question, so I started a bounty and I'm going to give some more background in case there is another way to go about this. I want to provide keyboard support for the Silverlight ComoboBox. Out of the box it only supports the up and down arrows but I also want it to work so that when the user hits a letter, the ComboBox jumps to the first item of that letter, similar to how ComboBoxes work in a browser or Windows app.
I found this blog post, which got me half way. Adapting that behavior code, the ComboBox will change selection based on letter input. However, it does not work when the ComboBox is opened. The reason for this, according to this blog post is that when the ComboBox is opened, you are now interacting with its ItemsPanel and not the ComboBox itself. So according to that post I actually need to add a StackPanel to the ItemsPanelTemplate and subscribe to the StackPanel's KeyDown event, in order to take action when the ComboBox is opened.
So that is what prompted my question of how to get a StackPanel into the ItemsPanelTemplate of a ComboBox, from a behavior. If that is not possible, are there alternative ways of getting this to work? Yes, I know I could go to each ComboBox in the application and add a StackPanel and the event. But I want to do this through a behavior so that I don't have to modify every ComboBox in the app, and so I can reuse this logic across applications.
AnthonyWJones' answer below using XamlReader gets me part way, in that I can create the StackPanel and get it into the template. However, I need to be able to get at that SP programmatically in order to subscribe to the event.

This should work. I've shown how you can change the orientation below. You can add additional SetValue calls to modify other properties.
cb.ItemsPanel = new ItemsPanelTemplate();
var stackPanelFactory = new FrameworkElementFactory(typeof (StackPanel));
// Modify it like this:
stackPanelFactory.SetValue(StackPanel.OrientationProperty, Orientation.Horizontal);
// Set the root of the template to the stack panel factory:
cb.ItemsPanel.VisualTree = stackPanelFactory;
You can find more detailed information in this article: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/codeVsXAML.aspx

What you actually want to build programmatically is this:-
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
Your behaviour will then assign this to the ItemsPanel property of the ComboBox it is attached to. Currently your behaviour is pure code but there is no way to create the above purely in code.
Since this is such a small piece for of Xaml the easiest approach is to use the XamlReader:-
ItemsPanelTemplate itemsPanelTemplate = XamlReader.Load("<ItemsPanelTemplate><StackPanel /></ItemsPanelTemplate>");

I think, best way for you - extend combobox functionality not via behavior but using inheritance.
So, you can create own control MyComboBox:ComboBox. Create style for it - get default ComboBox Style
here
And write instead (look for ScrollViewer by name):
< ScrollViewer x:Name="ScrollViewer" BorderThickness="0" Padding="1" >
< ItemsPresenter />
< /ScrollViewer >
this
< ScrollViewer x:Name="ScrollViewer" BorderThickness="0" Padding="1" >
< StackPanel x:Name="StackPanel" >
< ItemsPresenter />
< /StackPanel >
< /ScrollViewer >
This StackPanel you can get in code:
public class MyComboBox: ComboBox{
public CM()
{
DefaultStyleKey = typeof (MyComboBox);
}
public override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
StackPanel stackPanel = (StackPanel)GetTemplateChild("StackPanel");
stackPanel.KeyUp += (s, e) => { /*do something*/ };
}
}
Inheritance is more powerful. It's allow work with template elements.
If you decided to inject ItemsPanel, you must understand that:
1)it's impossible from code with keeping reference on injected panel.
2)to get reference to injected panel, this panel must registered itself in some storage, e.g.
< ComboBox>
< ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
< ItemsPanelTemplate>
< StackPanel>
< i:Interaction.EventTriggers>
< i:EventTrigger EventName="Loaded">
< RegisterMyInstanceInAccessibleFromCodePlaceAction/>
< /i:EventTrigger>
< /i:Interaction.EventTriggers>
< /StackPanel>
< /ItemsPanelTemplate>
< /ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
< /ComboBox>
Good luck!

I found your post while trying to set the ItemsPanel from code so that I can implement a VirtualizingStackPanel. When there are hundreds of items in my list, performance sucks. Anyway .. here's how I did it.
1) Custom control
2) Custom Behavior
-- you could also just apply this behavior to the normal ComboBox - either at each instance, or through a style.
-- you might also expose the timeout value so that can be overridden in xaml ..
-- also, it seems this doesn't work when the dropdown itself is open. not sure why exactly .. never looked into it
1..
public class KeyPressSelectionComboBox : ComboBox
{
private BindingExpression _bindingExpression;
public KeyPressSelectionComboBox()
: base()
{
Interaction.GetBehaviors(this).Add(new KeyPressSelectionBehavior());
Height = 22;
this.SelectionChanged += new SelectionChangedEventHandler(KeyPressSelectionComboBox_SelectionChanged);
}
void KeyPressSelectionComboBox_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (_bindingExpression == null)
{
_bindingExpression = this.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.SelectedValueProperty);
}
else
{
if (this.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.SelectedValueProperty) == null)
{
this.SetBinding(ComboBox.SelectedValueProperty, _bindingExpression.ParentBinding);
}
}
}
}
2...
/// <summary>
/// This behavior can be attached to a ListBox or ComboBox to
/// add keyboard selection
/// </summary>
public class KeyPressSelectionBehavior : Behavior<Selector>
{
private string keyDownHistory = string.Empty;
private double _keyDownTimeout = 2500;
private DateTime _lastKeyDownTime;
private DateTime LastKeyDownTime
{
get
{
if (this._lastKeyDownTime == null)
this._lastKeyDownTime = DateTime.Now;
return this._lastKeyDownTime;
}
set { _lastKeyDownTime = value; }
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the Path used to select the text
/// </summary>
public string SelectionMemberPath { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the Timeout (ms) used to reset the KeyDownHistory item search string
/// </summary>
public double KeyDownTimeout
{
get { return _keyDownTimeout; }
set { _keyDownTimeout = value; }
}
public KeyPressSelectionBehavior() { }
/// <summary>
/// Attaches to the specified object: subscribe on KeyDown event
/// </summary>
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
this.AssociatedObject.KeyDown += DoKeyDown;
}
void DoKeyDown(object sender, KeyEventArgs e)
{
// Create a list of strings and indexes
int index = 0;
IEnumerable<Item> list = null;
var path = SelectionMemberPath ??
this.AssociatedObject.DisplayMemberPath;
var evaluator = new BindingEvaluator();
if (path != null)
{
list = this.AssociatedObject.Items.OfType<object>()
.Select(item =>
{
// retrieve the value using the supplied Path
var binding = new Binding();
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(path);
binding.Source = item;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(evaluator,
BindingEvaluator.TargetProperty, binding);
var value = evaluator.Target;
return new Item
{
Index = index++,
Text = Convert.ToString(value)
};
});
}
else
{
list = this.AssociatedObject.Items.OfType<ListBoxItem>()
.Select(item => new Item
{
Index = index++,
Text = Convert.ToString(item.Content)
});
}
// Sort the list starting at next selectedIndex to the end and
// then from the beginning
list = list.OrderBy(item => item.Index <=
this.AssociatedObject.SelectedIndex ?
item.Index + this.AssociatedObject.Items.Count : item.Index);
// calculate how long has passed since the user typed a letter
var elapsedTime = DateTime.Now - this.LastKeyDownTime;
if (elapsedTime.TotalMilliseconds <= this.KeyDownTimeout)
{ /* if it's less than the timeout, add to the search string */
this.keyDownHistory += GetKeyValue(e);
}
else
{ /* otherwise replace it */
this.keyDownHistory = GetKeyValue(e);
}
// Find first starting with the search string
var searchText = this.keyDownHistory;
var first = list.FirstOrDefault(item =>
item.Text.StartsWith(searchText, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase));
if (first != null)
{ /* found */
this.AssociatedObject.SelectedIndex = first.Index;
}
else
{ /* not found - so reset the KeyDownHistory */
this.keyDownHistory = string.Empty;
}
// reset the last time a key was pressed
this.LastKeyDownTime = DateTime.Now;
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets the value of the pressed key,
/// specifically converting number keys from their "Dx" value to their expected "x" value
/// </summary>
/// <param name="e"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static string GetKeyValue(KeyEventArgs e)
{
string rValue = string.Empty;
switch (e.Key)
{
default:
rValue = e.Key.ToString();
break;
case Key.D0:
case Key.NumPad0:
rValue = (0).ToString();
break;
case Key.D1:
case Key.NumPad1:
rValue = (1).ToString();
break;
case Key.D2:
case Key.NumPad2:
rValue = (2).ToString();
break;
case Key.D3:
case Key.NumPad3:
rValue = (3).ToString();
break;
case Key.D4:
case Key.NumPad4:
rValue = (4).ToString();
break;
case Key.D5:
case Key.NumPad5:
rValue = (5).ToString();
break;
case Key.D6:
case Key.NumPad6:
rValue = (6).ToString();
break;
case Key.D7:
case Key.NumPad7:
rValue = (7).ToString();
break;
case Key.D8:
case Key.NumPad8:
rValue = (8).ToString();
break;
case Key.D9:
case Key.NumPad9:
rValue = (9).ToString();
break;
}
return rValue;
}
/// <summary>
/// Helper class
/// </summary>
private class Item
{
public int Index;
public string Text;
}
/// <summary>
/// Helper class used for property path value retrieval
/// </summary>
private class BindingEvaluator : FrameworkElement
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty TargetProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"Target",
typeof(object),
typeof(BindingEvaluator), null);
public object Target
{
get { return GetValue(TargetProperty); }
set { SetValue(TargetProperty, value); }
}
}
}

Related

Force Propagation of Coerced Value

tl;dr: Coerced values are not propagated across data bindings. How can I force the update across the data binding when code-behind doesn't know the other side of the binding?
I'm using a CoerceValueCallback on a WPF dependency property and I'm stuck at the issue that coerced values don't get propagated through to bindings.
Window1.xaml.cs
using System;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Media;
namespace CoerceValueTest
{
public class SomeControl : UserControl
{
public SomeControl()
{
StackPanel sp = new StackPanel();
Button bUp = new Button();
bUp.Content = "+";
bUp.Click += delegate(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {
Value += 2;
};
Button bDown = new Button();
bDown.Content = "-";
bDown.Click += delegate(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {
Value -= 2;
};
TextBlock tbValue = new TextBlock();
tbValue.SetBinding(TextBlock.TextProperty,
new Binding("Value") {
Source = this
});
sp.Children.Add(bUp);
sp.Children.Add(tbValue);
sp.Children.Add(bDown);
this.Content = sp;
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Value",
typeof(int),
typeof(SomeControl),
new PropertyMetadata(0, ProcessValueChanged, CoerceValue));
private static object CoerceValue(DependencyObject d, object baseValue)
{
if ((int)baseValue % 2 == 0) {
return baseValue;
} else {
return DependencyProperty.UnsetValue;
}
}
private static void ProcessValueChanged(object source, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
((SomeControl)source).ProcessValueChanged(e);
}
private void ProcessValueChanged(DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
OnValueChanged(EventArgs.Empty);
}
protected virtual void OnValueChanged(EventArgs e)
{
if (e == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("e");
}
if (ValueChanged != null) {
ValueChanged(this, e);
}
}
public event EventHandler ValueChanged;
public int Value {
get {
return (int)GetValue(ValueProperty);
}
set {
SetValue(ValueProperty, value);
}
}
}
public class SomeBiggerControl : UserControl
{
public SomeBiggerControl()
{
Border parent = new Border();
parent.BorderThickness = new Thickness(2);
parent.Margin = new Thickness(2);
parent.Padding = new Thickness(3);
parent.BorderBrush = Brushes.DarkRed;
SomeControl ctl = new SomeControl();
ctl.SetBinding(SomeControl.ValueProperty,
new Binding("Value") {
Source = this,
Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay
});
parent.Child = ctl;
this.Content = parent;
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Value",
typeof(int),
typeof(SomeBiggerControl),
new PropertyMetadata(0));
public int Value {
get {
return (int)GetValue(ValueProperty);
}
set {
SetValue(ValueProperty, value);
}
}
}
public partial class Window1 : Window
{
public Window1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
}
Window1.xaml
<Window x:Class="CoerceValueTest.Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="CoerceValueTest" Height="300" Width="300"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:CoerceValueTest"
>
<StackPanel>
<local:SomeBiggerControl x:Name="sc"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Value, ElementName=sc, Mode=TwoWay}" Name="tb"/>
<Button Content=" "/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
i.e. two user controls, one nested inside the other, and the outer one of those in a window. The inner user control has a Value dependency property that is bound to a Value dependency property of the outer control. In the window, a TextBox.Text property is bound to the Value property of the outer control.
The inner control has a CoerceValueCallback registered with its Value property whose effect is that this Value property can only be assigned even numbers.
Note that this code is simplified for demonstration purposes. The real version doesn't initialize anything in the constructor; the two controls actually have control templates that do everything that's done in the respective constructors here. That is, in the real code, the outer control doesn't know the inner control.
When writing an even number into the text box and changing the focus (e.g. by focusing the dummy button below the text box), both Value properties get duly updated. When writing an odd number into the text box, however, the Value property of the inner control doesn't change, while the Value property of the outer control, as well as the TextBox.Text property, show the odd number.
My question is: How can I force an update in the text box (and ideally also in the outer control's Value property, while we're at it)?
I have found an SO question on the same problem, but doesn't really provide a solution. It alludes to using a property changed event handler to reset the value, but as far as I can see, that would mean duplicating the evaluation code to the outer control ... which is not really viable, as my actual evaluation code relies on some information basically only known (without much effort) to the inner control.
Moreover, this blogpost suggests invoking UpdateTarget on the binding in TextBox.Text in the CoerceValueCallback, but first, as implied above, my inner control cannot possibly have any knowledge about the text box, and second, I would probably have to call UpdateSource first on the binding of the Value property of the inner control. I don't see where to do that, though, as within the CoerceValue method, the coerced value has not yet been set (so it's too early to update the binding), while in the case that the value is reset by CoerceValue, the property value will just remain what it was, hence a property changed callback will not get invoked (as also implied in this discussion).
One possible workaround I had thought of was replacing the dependency property in SomeControl with a conventional property and an INotifyPropertyChanged implementation (so I can manually trigger the PropertyChanged event even if the value has been coerced). However, this would mean that I cannot declare a binding on that property any more, so it's not a really useful solution.
I have been looking for an answer to this rather nasty bug myself for a while.
One way to do it, without the need to force an UpdateTarget on the bindings is this:
Remove your CoerceValue callback.
Shift the logic of the CoerceValue callback into your ProcessValueChanged callback.
Assign your coerced value to your Value property, when applicable (when the number is odd)
You will end up with the ProcessValueChanged callback being hit twice, but your coerced value will end up being effectively pushed to your binding.
Base on your code, your dependency property declaration would become this:
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Value",
typeof(int),
typeof(SomeControl),
new PropertyMetadata(0, ProcessValueChanged, null));
And then, your ProcessValueChanged would become this:
private static void ProcessValueChanged(object source, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
int baseValue = (int) e.NewValue;
SomeControl someControl = source as SomeControl;
if (baseValue % 2 != 0)
{
someControl.Value = DependencyProperty.UnsetValue;
}
else
{
someControl.ProcessValueChanged(e);
}
}
I slightly modified your logic, to prevent raising the event when the value needs to be coerced. As mentionned before, assigning to someControl.Value the coerced value will cause your ProcessValueChanged to be called twice in a row. Putting the else statement would only raise the events with valid values once.
I hope this helps!

WPF ListView columns dont update thair width in time [duplicate]

I have a ListView WPF control with a GridView. I'd like to resize the GridView columns when the content of the columns changes.
I have several distinct data sets but when I change from one to another, the size of each columns fits the previous data. I'd like to update dynamically. How can I do that?
Finally, some results on this one. I've found a way to do the same auto-sizing that is done initially and when the gripper on a column header is double clicked.
public void AutoSizeColumns()
{
GridView gv = listView1.View as GridView;
if (gv != null)
{
foreach (var c in gv.Columns)
{
// Code below was found in GridViewColumnHeader.OnGripperDoubleClicked() event handler (using Reflector)
// i.e. it is the same code that is executed when the gripper is double clicked
if (double.IsNaN(c.Width))
{
c.Width = c.ActualWidth;
}
c.Width = double.NaN;
}
}
}
Building on top of Oskars answer, here is a blend behavior to automatically size the columns when the content changes.
/// <summary>
/// A <see cref="Behavior{T}"/> implementation which will automatically resize the automatic columns of a <see cref="ListView">ListViews</see> <see cref="GridView"/> to the new content.
/// </summary>
public class GridViewColumnResizeBehaviour : Behavior<ListView>
{
/// <summary>
/// Listens for when the <see cref="ItemsControl.Items"/> collection changes.
/// </summary>
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
var listView = AssociatedObject;
if (listView == null)
return;
AddHandler(listView.Items);
}
private void AddHandler(INotifyCollectionChanged sourceCollection)
{
Contract.Requires(sourceCollection != null);
sourceCollection.CollectionChanged += OnListViewItemsCollectionChanged;
}
private void RemoveHandler(INotifyCollectionChanged sourceCollection)
{
Contract.Requires(sourceCollection != null);
sourceCollection.CollectionChanged -= OnListViewItemsCollectionChanged;
}
private void OnListViewItemsCollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs notifyCollectionChangedEventArgs)
{
var listView = AssociatedObject;
if (listView == null)
return;
var gridView = listView.View as GridView;
if (gridView == null)
return;
// If the column is automatically sized, change the column width to re-apply automatic width
foreach (var column in gridView.Columns.Where(column => Double.IsNaN(column.Width)))
{
Contract.Assume(column != null);
column.Width = column.ActualWidth;
column.Width = Double.NaN;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Stops listening for when the <see cref="ItemsControl.Items"/> collection changes.
/// </summary>
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
var listView = AssociatedObject;
if (listView != null)
RemoveHandler(listView.Items);
base.OnDetaching();
}
}
If like me you are old and prefer VB.NET then here's Oskars code:
Public Sub AutoSizeColumns()
Dim gv As GridView = TryCast(Me.listview1.View, GridView)
If gv IsNot Nothing Then
For Each c As GridViewColumn In gv.Columns
If Double.IsNaN(c.Width) Then
c.Width = c.ActualWidth
End If
c.Width = Double.NaN
Next
End If
End Sub
This works great in WPF, finally someone has worked this out. Thanks Oskar.
Isn't there a way to bind to the ActualWidth of the column? Something like :
<GridViewColumn x:Name="column1" Width="{Binding ElementName=column1, Path=ActualWidth}" />
I have tried this and it works only the first time, it seems. No binding error.
You could measure the longest string in pixels and then adjust the column widths accordingly:
Graphics graphics = this.CreateGraphics();
SizeF textSize = graphics.MeasureString("How long am I?", this.Font);
If you create an algorithm for sizing each column as a ratio of these lengths, you should get a good result.

Best way to implement margin between WPF/SL grid columns/rows

What's the best way to add margin between columns or rows in a WPF or Silverlight grid?
Add fixed width/height columns/rows to the grid
Add margin to the grid child controls
Anything else?
Thanks in advance
It depends, really, on your design, and is a matter of your own tastes. The biggest thing is to be consistent.
I think it's perfectly acceptable to put a fixed width "spacer" column or row in most cases - then you don't have to worry about maintenance later (either by you or somebody else).
The thing to watch out for is setting things twice (i.e. both a margin and fixed width column). It's not too big a problem if you are using all the same kind of control, but it could get a little ugly if you use different kinds of controls that have Styles applied to them that include Margins and/or Padding.
If you don't mind deriving your own control from the Grid and using that instead, you can do it quite easily. Since it seems like a good idea I quickly whipped up this (mostly untested and quite ugly!) code:
/// <summary>
/// Enhanced Grid that can automatically apply a padding to all its children.
/// </summary>
public class PaddedGrid : Grid
{
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets a padding value to apply as the margin to all children.
/// If left to default (null or 'zero' Thickness) the margins of the children are not modified.
/// </summary>
public Thickness? Padding
{
get { return (Thickness?)GetValue(PaddingProperty); }
set { SetValue(PaddingProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty PaddingProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Padding", typeof(Thickness?), typeof(PaddedGrid), new PropertyMetadata(PaddingChanged));
private bool HasPadding()
{
return Padding.HasValue && Padding.Value != default(Thickness);
}
private static void PaddingChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var g = d as PaddedGrid;
if (g != null)
{
if (!g.HasPadding()) return;
for (int i = 0; i < g.VisualChildrenCount; i++)
{
var v = g.GetVisualChild(i);
var c = v as FrameworkElement;
if (c == null || c is GridSplitter) continue;
c.Margin = (Thickness)e.NewValue;
}
}
}
protected override void OnVisualChildrenChanged(DependencyObject visualAdded, DependencyObject visualRemoved)
{
base.OnVisualChildrenChanged(visualAdded, visualRemoved);
if (!HasPadding()) return;
if (visualAdded != null)
{
var fe = visualAdded as FrameworkElement;
if (fe != null) fe.Margin = this.Padding.Value;
}
}
}

WPF doesn't honor Textbox.MinLines for Auto height calculation

I want to have a TextBox which Height grows as Iam entering lines of Text.
I've set the Height property to "Auto", and so far the growing works.
Now I want that the TextBox's Height should be at least 5 lines.
Now I've set the MinLines property to "5" but if I start the app the TextBox's height is still one line.
Try setting the MinHeight property.
A hack to make the MinLines property work
public class TextBoxAdv : TextBox
{
bool loaded = false;
/// <summary>
/// Constructor
/// </summary>
public TextBoxAdv()
{
Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler( Control_Loaded );
SetResourceReference( StyleProperty, typeof( TextBox ) );
}
void Control_Loaded( object sender, RoutedEventArgs e )
{
if( !loaded )
{
loaded = true;
string text = Text;
Text = "Text";
UpdateLayout();
Text = text;
}
}
}
I propose a different solution that properly respects the MinLines property, rather than forcing you to use MinHeight.
First, start with a convenience method to allow you to Post an action to the window loop. (I'm including both one where you need to pass state and one where you don't.)
public static class Globals {
public static void Post(Action callback){
if(SynchronizationContext.Current is SynchronizationContext currentContext)
currentContext.Post( _ => callback(), null);
else{
callback();
}
}
public static void Post<TState>(TState state, Action<TState> callback){
if(SynchronizationContext.Current is SynchronizationContext currentContext)
currentContext.Post(_ => callback(state), null);
else{
callback(state);
}
}
}
Next, create an extension method for TextBox to 'initialize' the proper size based on MinLines. I put this in a Hacks class because to me, that's what this is and it clearly identifies the code as such.
public static void FixInitialMinLines(this TextBox textBox) {
Globals.Post(() => {
var textBinding = textBox.GetBindingExpression(TextBox.TextProperty)?.ParentBinding;
if (textBinding != null) {
BindingOperations.ClearBinding(textBox, TextBox.TextProperty);
textBox.UpdateLayout();
BindingOperations.SetBinding(textBox, TextBox.TextProperty, textBinding);
}
else {
var lastValue = textBox.Text;
textBox.Text = lastValue + "a";
textBox.UpdateLayout();
textBox.Text = lastValue;
}
});
}
The above code handles both bound and unbound TextBox controls, but rather than simply changing the value like other controls which may cascade that change down through the bindings, it first disconnects the binding, forces layout, then reconnects the binding, thus triggering the proper layout in the UI. This avoids unintentionally changing your bound sources should the binding be two-way.
Finally, simply call the extension method for every TextBox where MinLines is set. Thanks to the Post call in the extension method, You can call this immediately after InitializeComponent and it will still be executed after all other events have fired, including all layout and the Loaded event.
public partial class Main : Window {
public Main() {
InitializeComponent();
// Fix initial MinLines issue
SomeTextBoxWithMinLines.FixInitialMinLines();
}
...
}
Add the above code to your 'library' of functions and you can address the issue with a single line of code in all of your windows and controls. Enjoy!

How can I access the ListViewItems of a WPF ListView?

Within an event, I'd like to put the focus on a specific TextBox within the ListViewItem's template. The XAML looks like this:
<ListView x:Name="myList" ItemsSource="{Binding SomeList}">
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn>
<GridViewColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<!-- Focus this! -->
<TextBox x:Name="myBox"/>
I've tried the following in the code behind:
(myList.FindName("myBox") as TextBox).Focus();
but I seem to have misunderstood the FindName() docs, because it returns null.
Also the ListView.Items doesn't help, because that (of course) contains my bound business objects and no ListViewItems.
Neither does myList.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromItem(item), which also returns null.
To understand why ContainerFromItem didn't work for me, here some background. The event handler where I needed this functionality looks like this:
var item = new SomeListItem();
SomeList.Add(item);
ListViewItem = SomeList.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromItem(item); // returns null
After the Add() the ItemContainerGenerator doesn't immediately create the container, because the CollectionChanged event could be handled on a non-UI-thread. Instead it starts an asynchronous call and waits for the UI thread to callback and execute the actual ListViewItem control generation.
To be notified when this happens, the ItemContainerGenerator exposes a StatusChanged event which is fired after all Containers are generated.
Now I have to listen to this event and decide whether the control currently want's to set focus or not.
As others have noted, The myBox TextBox can not be found by calling FindName on the ListView. However, you can get the ListViewItem that is currently selected, and use the VisualTreeHelper class to get the TextBox from the ListViewItem. To do so looks something like this:
private void myList_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (myList.SelectedItem != null)
{
object o = myList.SelectedItem;
ListViewItem lvi = (ListViewItem)myList.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromItem(o);
TextBox tb = FindByName("myBox", lvi) as TextBox;
if (tb != null)
tb.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new Func<bool>(tb.Focus));
}
}
private FrameworkElement FindByName(string name, FrameworkElement root)
{
Stack<FrameworkElement> tree = new Stack<FrameworkElement>();
tree.Push(root);
while (tree.Count > 0)
{
FrameworkElement current = tree.Pop();
if (current.Name == name)
return current;
int count = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(current);
for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
{
DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(current, i);
if (child is FrameworkElement)
tree.Push((FrameworkElement)child);
}
}
return null;
}
I noticed that the question title does not directly relate to the content of the question, and neither does the accepted answer answer it. I have been able to "access the ListViewItems of a WPF ListView" by using this:
public static IEnumerable<ListViewItem> GetListViewItemsFromList(ListView lv)
{
return FindChildrenOfType<ListViewItem>(lv);
}
public static IEnumerable<T> FindChildrenOfType<T>(this DependencyObject ob)
where T : class
{
foreach (var child in GetChildren(ob))
{
T castedChild = child as T;
if (castedChild != null)
{
yield return castedChild;
}
else
{
foreach (var internalChild in FindChildrenOfType<T>(child))
{
yield return internalChild;
}
}
}
}
public static IEnumerable<DependencyObject> GetChildren(this DependencyObject ob)
{
int childCount = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(ob);
for (int i = 0; i < childCount; i++)
{
yield return VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(ob, i);
}
}
I'm not sure how hectic the recursion gets, but it seemed to work fine in my case. And no, I have not used yield return in a recursive context before.
You can traverse up the ViewTree to find the item 'ListViewItem' record set that corresponds to the cell triggered from hit test.
Similarly, you can get the column headers from the parent view to compare and match the cell's column. You may want to bind the cell name to the column header name as your key for your comparator delegate/filter.
For example: HitResult is on TextBlock shown in green. You wish to obtain the handle to the 'ListViewItem'.
/// <summary>
/// ListView1_MouseMove
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender"></param>
/// <param name="e"></param>
private void ListView1_MouseMove(object sender, System.Windows.Input.MouseEventArgs e) {
if (ListView1.Items.Count <= 0)
return;
// Retrieve the coordinate of the mouse position.
var pt = e.GetPosition((UIElement) sender);
// Callback to return the result of the hit test.
HitTestResultCallback myHitTestResult = result => {
var obj = result.VisualHit;
// Add additional DependancyObject types to ignore triggered by the cell's parent object container contexts here.
//-----------
if (obj is Border)
return HitTestResultBehavior.Stop;
//-----------
var parent = VisualTreeHelper.GetParent(obj) as GridViewRowPresenter;
if (parent == null)
return HitTestResultBehavior.Stop;
var headers = parent.Columns.ToDictionary(column => column.Header.ToString());
// Traverse up the VisualTree and find the record set.
DependencyObject d = parent;
do {
d = VisualTreeHelper.GetParent(d);
} while (d != null && !(d is ListViewItem));
// Reached the end of element set as root's scope.
if (d == null)
return HitTestResultBehavior.Stop;
var item = d as ListViewItem;
var index = ListView1.ItemContainerGenerator.IndexFromContainer(item);
Debug.WriteLine(index);
lblCursorPosition.Text = $"Over {item.Name} at ({index})";
// Set the behavior to return visuals at all z-order levels.
return HitTestResultBehavior.Continue;
};
// Set up a callback to receive the hit test result enumeration.
VisualTreeHelper.HitTest((Visual)sender, null, myHitTestResult, new PointHitTestParameters(pt));
}
We use a similar technique with WPF's new datagrid:
Private Sub SelectAllText(ByVal cell As DataGridCell)
If cell IsNot Nothing Then
Dim txtBox As TextBox= GetVisualChild(Of TextBox)(cell)
If txtBox IsNot Nothing Then
txtBox.Focus()
txtBox.SelectAll()
End If
End If
End Sub
Public Shared Function GetVisualChild(Of T As {Visual, New})(ByVal parent As Visual) As T
Dim child As T = Nothing
Dim numVisuals As Integer = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(parent)
For i As Integer = 0 To numVisuals - 1
Dim v As Visual = TryCast(VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(parent, i), Visual)
If v IsNot Nothing Then
child = TryCast(v, T)
If child Is Nothing Then
child = GetVisualChild(Of T)(v)
Else
Exit For
End If
End If
Next
Return child
End Function
The technique should be fairly applicable for you, just pass your listviewitem once it's generated.
Or it can be simply done by
private void yourtextboxinWPFGrid_LostFocus(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
//textbox can be catched like this.
var textBox = ((TextBox)sender);
EmailValidation(textBox.Text);
}

Resources