I am pretty much new to using SQL Server 2000. I have been using only open source databases until this time. I want to know if there is any developer version of SQL Server 2000 available. It's for learning purposes only. Is it available free or do I need to pay for it?
Thanks
If you really need 2000, the only way I know of is to subscribe to buy an MSDN subscription. It's still available on the subscribers download page (though I'd do it soon -- it's old enough it wouldn't surprise me if it disappeared soon).
You can download and install SQL Server express 2005. It's free of charge.
http://www.microsoft.com/Sqlserver/2005/en/us/express.aspx
SQL Server express 2008 is here:
http://www.microsoft.com/express/database/
But I had problems installing it myself. I'm still using the 2005 version.
yes, there is
http://www.microsoft.com/express/Database/
and google ;)
http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&client=firefox-a&hs=LJN&rls=org.mozilla%3Anl-NL%3Aofficial&q=expess+sql+server+2008&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
you can try the SQL_SERVER's express verison
that's freeļ¼ download on the MS's website
Related
I have database created on SQL SERVER 2008. I want to upgrade it to SQL SERVER 2016. what is the best way to upgrade the whole database?
Thanks in advance.
Migration can be done many ways from 2008 to 2016. In-house upgrade, backup restore, etc. Different approaches are explained here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/install-windows/upgrade-database-engine
But simple backup/restore approach is the always better in my practical understanding. Also It has links for SSIS/SSAS/SSRS if required plan for those. Each has different approaches...
Major things to consider are how to remove deprecated features and how to make use of new features:
Deprecated features:
2012:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143729(v=sql.110).aspx
2014:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144262(v=sql.120)
2016:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/discontinued-database-engine-functionality-in-sql-server-2016
You can use new AMR tool to identify what tables you can use for in-memory also you can do analysis of columnstore indexes etc using below:
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/dataplatforminsider/2013/09/17/new-amr-tool-simplifying-the-migration-to-in-memory-oltp/
I had big problems upgrading from 2008 to 20014 as it complained about 2008 SP2 missing, but there where additional messages about missing instance ID's or nothing needed to be installed.
The upgrade from 2008 to 2012 was a better move as the 2012 is probaly better designed to deal with a previous release.
Once 2012 was installed I moved to 2014 with no problem and did not have to care about attached databases. It just upgraded.
I had to use the "SQL Server Configuration Manager" to enable Named Pipes or TCP/IP connection in the "SQL Server Network Configuration" section, and enable the new SQL service .exe in the windows firewall.
To add it to the firewall the service exe "sqlsrvr.exe" was identified using the Windows task manager and using "properties" optaning the path to the .exe.
The installation makes you nervous but once installed you know SQL Server is one of the few Microsft products that does not bother you. It just works.
Instead of downloading missing servicepacks manually it was easier to run Windows update and have it suggest SQL server sevicepacks. Winows update actually helped before migrating to the next version.
Here is a nice chart of sql server editions with links to downloads:
Microsoft SQL Server Version List
i want to download sql server 2014 to my laptop,i tried many websites but couldnt find how can some one please help me?
Did you not try the Microsoft website?
You can get the free Express version here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/download/details.aspx?id=42299
If you want another version you will need to either create a Microsoft account to download the Developer edition or pay lots of money to Microsoft to get the Standard or Enterprise editions.
I have heard other developers (i.e., not db administrators) complain over the years about the complexity of getting SQL Server installed and configured properly. I installed SQL Server 2014 about six months ago for a project that I'm no longer working on. I tried installing 2008 R2 with a named instance for a new project but something went wrong and I now have an inaccessible instance. My instinct is to remove everything and to just start fresh. Is this the right instinct?
If it is the right instinct, any advice on how to fully, fully, fully uninstall all instances of SQL Server? Seems every time I try to do so, there are some bits and pieces left behind and that gets me wondering if those leftover bits are causing trouble for subsequent re-installs.
If this is not the right instinct, please set me straight. I'm hoping that all of the answers will not be "db administrators are paid to be good at this so go find one." Of course, this is probably the best and most accurate response; but I would also like to solve my problem so if this is your response then I would be grateful if you could point me to a reliable, on-demand SQL Server admin service that I can consult to get this right -- I'm happy to pay for some high quality and efficient help.
Thanks for any advice.
Bob
If you are having problems accessing the server it's a good instinct to remove the name instance and install a new one. The reason you could not access the name instance could be compatibility problem b/n sql2014 and SQL 2008R2 or configuration problem. why do you really want to install SQL 2014 instead of sql2008? my be it's better to install SQL 2014 name instance.
please look at this link to remove the name instance SQL 2008.
http://thoughtsonopsmgr.blogspot.com/2012/10/how-to-remove-sql-server-instance-from.html
I discovered that SQL Server 2008 R2 isn't supported on Windows 10: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2681562
So I uninstalled everything related to 2008 (which required a couple of reboots and further uninstall attempts) and then uninstalled everything I could find for 2014... and then I reinstalled 2014 from scratch... and I'm golden.
Is it possible to host Sharepoint and SQL Server off the same server for small time testing. Environment would be set up for purely education purposes. Non-production. Thanks.
Yes. We do this also. Works like a charm.
Your best bet would be to use a simple virtual environment (I quiet like VirtualBox) and then run a server operating system on there, install SQL Server (if it is only for testing SQL Server express would be sufficient) and then install SharePoint. When you have installed SharePoint you will be better removing the default web application it adds for you and then adding your own as you will be able to link the new application's database easily to the instance of SQL on your SQL server.
Don't forget that if you are looking at using SharePoint 2010 it all has to be 64bit...
Minimum development environment for sharepoint 2007 webparts
Hope this helps anyway...
It is possible, but SQL server likes to use up all the RAM, making sharepoint really slow, and sometimes with sharepoint 2010 it crashes the web application.
Try to limit how much RAM sql server takes
http://blog.stevehorn.cc/2007/10/limit-memory-usage-in-sql-server-2005.html
Can it be done and if so, how?
You can also check out Sync Services for Sql Server and Compact edition. The benefit of Sync Services is that you don't need a replication server or IIS and you can also sync between compact edition databases. This method involves writing a fair bit more code and is fairly involved, but I'd recommend looking into it as a lightweight service.
You can use Merge Replication. Theres a tutorial here SQL Server Compact 3.5 How-to Tutorials (Number 5).
Certainly replication is possible, as is Sync Services if you're not afraid to get your hands dirty. It depends on the details of what you need:
Sometimes-connected application wanting to have a read-only cache: Sync Services
Sometimes-connected application wanting to have part or full update ability: Sync Services
Remote site with multiple workstations needing read/write access to data: replication if you can get a secure network connection that's stable enough, otherwise look at extending Syn Services to work with SQL Express (or full SQL Server) based on the sample here: Sync using SQL Express
If you just want a SQL CE database and you're working with a SQL 2008 server then the wizard in Visual Studio 2008 SP1 will do all the work for you, you need only add 1 line of code to it if you want bi-directional support. If you can't upgrade then it will take more work with SQL 2005, and it's only reliable if you have at least SP2.
I'm in the middle of a project that requires multiple sites to have a sub-set of data in an environment where each site may lose it's connection to the head office at times, we've managed to get Sync Services to work with SQL 2008 at the head office and SQL Express 2008 at each site with full change tracking (2008 feature) and it's working great. It does require a reasonable amount of code (C# and SQL), so we've used some pretty smart templates to help. Be aware that.
Perhaps you could refine your question with more details?
Because of budget constraints I think it will have to beta-tester's approch,i tried following the guide and cant seem to get it working. Before I spend time getting it to work, I just confrim, Replicating between SqlServer 2005 and Compact Edition is something that can be done?
I just confrim, Replicating between
SqlServer 2005 and Compact Edition is
something that can be done?
Yes it can definately be done using either Merge Replication or Sync Services