I do not understand the various data binding modes in WPF, such as:
One-Way
Two-Way
One-Time
etc...
What does each of these modes mean?
When should they be used?
OneWay: Use this when you want the bound property to update the user interface.
TwoWay: This has the same behavior as OneWay and OneWayToSource combined. The bound property will update the user interface, and changes in the user interface will update the bound property (You would use this with a TextBox or a Checkbox, for example.)
OneTime: This has the same behavior as OneWay, except it will only update the user interface one time. This should be your default choice for binding (for various reasons I won't elaborate on here). You should only use other types of bindings if you actually need the extra functionality.
OneWayToSource: This is the opposite of OneWay -- user interface value changes update the bound property.
If you don't specify anything, then the behavior will depend on the control that you are using.
For more info, see BindingMode enum on Microsoft Docs.
A binding consists of two entities:
The Source (Typically the ViewModel in MVVM scenarios)
The Target (The UI control)
The target has to be a DependencyObject (for binding to work) and the source can be either a DependencyObject or it should have some mechanism to imitate the WPF Binding system about it being changed (Implemeting INotifyPropetyChnaged interface).
MVVM recommends the ViewModel project to be free from any View related references and hence it is recommended to use INotifyPropertyChanged interface to make the Source object being heard by WPF binding.
Binding happens between a property of Source and a property of Target (has to be a DependencyProperty).
e.g. The TextPropertyof the TextBox class is DataBound to (say) UserName property of the view model.
WPF binding offers four types of Binding. Remember, Binding runs on UI thread unless otherwise you specify it to run otherwise.
OneWay: The target property will listen to the source property being changed and will update itself. If you programmatically change the ViewwModel's UserName property, it will reflect in the text box. This is of intermediate cost as the binding system watches only Source for changes.
TwoWay: The target property will listen to the source property being changed and will update itself. AND The source property will listen to the target property being changed and will update itself. Both the TextProperty and the UserName property will remain in sync and will update each other if one changes. This is most costly as the binding system has to watch both sides for change.
OneWayToSource: The Source property will change if the target property is changed. If the user changes the TextProperty, the UserName property will take up the changed value. This again is of intermediate cost as the binding system watches only Target for changes.
OneTime: This happens only once during the lifetime of Binding, the Target property will be updated with the Source property when the Binding happens. This is least costly and is advisable for scenarios where you have static data to be shown e.g. Label, TextBlock etc.
If you don't mention anything, every target property has a default binding mode associated with itself. E.g. the TextProperty of a TextBox has default binding mode as TwoWay. For the TextProperty of a TextBlock it is one way.
It is advisable that you choose the right mode as it can help you reduce the application latency especially in cases where you have large number of controls in your UI.
For more on MVVM here is an article written by me.
Related
The question is related to WPF Data Binding and MVVM pattern.
I am bit confused now distinguishing between the Dependency property defined in the XAML.cs file as well as a CLR property defined in the view model which is bound to some property of a component
For example say, I have a textbox in MyPage.xaml. So I created a dependency property to bind the textbox text property in the MyPage.xaml.cs maybe some String. The next time, I created a viewModel MyPageViewModel.cs which implements the INotifyPropertyChanged interface and
created a CLR property there(String), which emits an event PropertyChanged when it changes or the property is set with a new value. So are these both the same? Is there any difference?
I have 3 questions
Is the Dependency Property same as CLR property which emits a PropertyChanged event when it changes?
Whether Dependency property is written in the view itself(MyPage.xaml.cs) or can it be included in the view
model(MyPageViewModel.cs)?
In MVVM pattern, we use the CLR properties more which emits an event during property change. So can dependency property be replaced
by such kind of CLR properties?
Thanks in advance.
An dependency property is on a DependencyObject from which all WPF UI elements derive from (and only works there), as it's static and saves it's value in a kind of collection assigned to a specific DependencyObject (on which the dependency property is defined). Dependency properties can be defined in a class outside of the actual DependencyObject to extend it's functionality without modifying the original user control class.
When you write a user control and want a ViewModel to allow to bind a value and receive notifications when it's changed, then you create a dependency property.
Imagine it like an USB cable, where you have a male plug and a female receptacle. The CLR property is like the plug and the dependency property is like the receptacle.
A dependency property allows you to store that's associated with a control but isn't part of the instance. As you can see on the MSDN Examples
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsSpinningProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"IsSpinning", typeof(Boolean),
...
);
public bool IsSpinning
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(IsSpinningProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsSpinningProperty, value); }
}
the dependency property is static and GetValue and SetValue are methods of DependencyObject (base class on which all WPF UI elements are based on).
Depencency Properties (and attached properties/attached behavior) can also be used to extend the functionality of a UserControl without inheriting from the actual user control type, i.e. notifying the ViewModel when a certain value changes which is not provided by the original user control.
Is the Dependency Property same as CLR property which emits a PropertyChanged event when it changes?
No, it's not the same. They are both 2 sides of the databinding engine. A DP is defined on the view to allow a view model to bind a INPC Property (Property that rises PropertyChanged event)
Whether Dependency property is written in the view itself(MyPage.xaml.cs) or can it be included in the view model(MyPageViewModel.cs)?
DP are part of the View-Layer as they depend on DependencyObject, which is part of the WPF framework and hence view concern. While technically nothing prevents you from using them in the ViewModel, this causes a tight coupling of your ViewModel towards a certain View technology, so it doesn't fully comply MVVM pattern.
Be aware though that unit testing Dependency Properties may be quite difficult as they don't store the values on the class they are defined on but in some kind of dictionary where the GetValue/SetValue methods warp around.
Last but not least, since DependencyObject is the base class of all UI it is as well as most of the classes that derive from it thread affine, which means you can only access it from the thread you created which may cause you much pain in both unit test (especially if the tests run in parallel like MSTest used to do. Dunno if its still true as of today) and in your code.
In MVVM pattern, we use the CLR properties more which emits an event during property change. So can dependency property be replaced by such kind of CLR properties?
In ViewModels you could and you should use INotifyPropertyChanged. If you are developing a user control, you shouldn't replace DPs with "CLR" properties, because this makes the property not work with databinding in XAML.
If your UI elements should expose a property which can be used with data binding you have to use dependency properties (or attached properties which are pretty similar, but you place attached properties on i.e. the child elements. Grid.Row and Grid.Column are examples of attached properties).
I've seen many Tutorials about the MVVM-Patern but I still don't get why I need to get a Dependency-Property or an INotiyfyPropertyChanged-Property if I want to send information from the ViewModel back to the View.
Dependency properties provide built in change notification for when a property changes which means WPF knows when a controls value has changed.
Your ViewModel types do not, by default, provide any mechanism for change notification so if they don't support either of these options how is the view supposed to know when a property in your viewModel has been changed?
You need your viewModel to use either of these options so that the view can be notified when a property value changes.
This means if a property value is changed in code, the user interface is updated and if a property is changed by user input your viewModel (and ultimately your model) is also updated to reflect these changes. (basically both sides of a binding require a way of communicating a property change to each other).
The INotifyPropertyChanged interface is the preferred method as it means your viewModels are not specific to WPF and can be used by other user interface technologies. also, dependency properties can only be used in types that derive from DependencyObject.
First: You do not need to use INotifyPropertyChanged or DependencyObject at all.
But, and this is the central point in using Binding, there is some Pub / Sub Mechanism in
the Binding, which is listening to those PropertyChanged events and doing the update
of the view in case a relevant property for Binding has changed.
Here is more information on that:
SO on how binding works
Pub Sub aka Publish Subscribe Pattern
INotiyfyPropertyChanged - This property we used in the viewmodel so that if there happens any changes in the UI this property will reflect those changes.
My question is in the title. I read that a binding target must be a DP but a reply I got from a moderator on the WPF forum seemed to indicate that it was sufficient for my class to implement INotifyPropertyChanged in order to designate it as a binding target.
Targets of data bindings are required to be dependency properties. WPF data binding sources do not have to be dependency properties. Obviously there must exist some kind of mechanism for the source object to notify the outside world when the bound property has changed. For that you have to implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface and has an event named PropertyChanged, which identifies the particular event that's changed with a string.
for more please have a look at this links
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms522664.aspx
http://www.charlespetzold.com/blog/2006/03/210946.html
I have a business object that comes from the core of the application. That object does not inherit from INotifyPropertyChanged. It contains some property that my XAML code bind to it.
I only want to update the properties not the UI dynamically (OneWayToSource style).
By example, if I change the text of a text box, the source item does not get updated.
It is a limitation of silverlight that if the object does not implement INotifyPropertyChanged or use DepencyProperties that the source of the binding cannot be updated?
The source property does not need to be a dependency property nor does the class that exposes it need to implement INotifyPropertyChanged.
If you have the binding on the TextBox set to use the TwoWay mode editing the text box should update the bound property even if it is a plain "vanila" property. Note by default the focus has to leave the TextBox in order for the binding to update.
If your business object has a set method on the property you want to update, then the value should be updated, provided the value you enter doesn't trigger an exception.
Not implementing INotifyPropertyChanged hinders just visual feedback.
I have a an object which is set to the DataContext in a Window. I have textboxes in the window which are bound to the properties on the object. There seems to be a delay however before the properties on the object are updated.
<TextBox x:Name="txtPropertyOne" Text="{Binding Path=PropertyOne,Mode=TwoWay,UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
If I change the values in a few textboxes then quickly try to access the properties to which they map, sometimes there are changes which aren't reflected in the properties of the object. I thought that was what the PropertyChanged UpdateSourceTrigger was supposed to take care of.
If I change the values in a few
textboxes then quickly try to access
the properties to which they map
I can interpret this statement in two ways:
You're trying to access the values on a background thread. In that case, you may be accessing the properties before the UI thread has had a chance to do its thing.
You're using a separate message on the UI thread to check the values. Bindings are updated at a priority lower than Send and Normal. So if your message is priority Send or Normal it will be processed before any pending binding updates.
If this doesn't answer your question, please clarify what you mean by "quickly trying to access the properties".
The basic rule of WPF Databinding is simple:
The target property must be a
dependency property, and you're
already correct, it's bound to Text
property of TextBox.
The source property can be a CLR
object (other than any derived WPF's
DependencyObject), but the object
must employ or implement its own
INotifyPropertyChanged.
Have you you already implemented INotifyPropertyChanged on your object?