I've been writing some batch files, and I ran into this user guide, which has been quite informative. One thing it showed me was that lines can be commented not just with REM, but also with ::. It says:
Comments in batch code can be made by using a double-colon, this is better than using the REM command because labels are processed before redirection symbols. ::<remark> causes no problems but rem <remark> produces errors.
Why then, do most guides and examples I see use the REM command? Does :: work on all versions of Windows?
tl;dr: REM is the documented and supported way to embed comments in batch files.
:: is essentially a blank label that can never be jumped to, whereas REM is an actual command that just does nothing. In neither case (at least on Windows 7) does the presence of redirection operators cause a problem.
However, :: is known to misbehave in blocks under certain circumstances, being parsed not as a label but as some sort of drive letter. I'm a little fuzzy on where exactly but that alone is enough to make me use REM exclusively. It's the documented and supported way to embed comments in batch files whereas :: is merely an artifact of a particular implementation.
Here is an example where :: produces a problem in a FOR loop.
This example will not work in a file called test.bat on your desktop:
#echo off
for /F "delims=" %%A in ('type C:\Users\%username%\Desktop\test.bat') do (
::echo hello>C:\Users\%username%\Desktop\text.txt
)
pause
While this example will work as a comment correctly:
#echo off
for /F "delims=" %%A in ('type C:\Users\%username%\Desktop\test.bat') do (
REM echo hello>C:\Users\%username%\Desktop\text.txt
)
pause
The problem appears to be when trying to redirect output into a file. My best guess is that it is interpreting :: as an escaped label called :echo.
Comments with REM
A REM can remark a complete line, also a multiline caret at the line end, if it's not the end of the first token.
REM This is a comment, the caret is ignored^
echo This line is printed
REM This_is_a_comment_the_caret_appends_the_next_line^
echo This line is part of the remark
REM followed by some characters .:\/= works a bit different, it doesn't comment an ampersand, so you can use it as inline comment.
echo First & REM. This is a comment & echo second
But to avoid problems with existing files like REM, REM.bat or REM;.bat only a modified variant should be used.
REM^;<space>Comment
And for the character ; is also allowed one of ;,:\/=
REM is about 6 times slower than :: (tested on Win7SP1 with 100000 comment lines).
For a normal usage it's not important (58µs versus 360µs per comment line)
Comments with ::
A :: always executes a line end caret.
:: This is also a comment^
echo This line is also a comment
Labels and also the comment label :: have a special logic in parenthesis blocks.
They span always two lines SO: goto command not working.
So they are not recommended for parenthesis blocks, as they are often the cause for syntax errors.
With ECHO ON a REM line is shown, but not a line commented with ::
Both can't really comment out the rest of the line, so a simple %~ will cause a syntax error.
REM This comment will result in an error %~ ...
But REM is able to stop the batch parser at an early phase, even before the special character phase is done.
#echo ON
REM This caret ^ is visible
You can use &REM or &:: to add a comment to the end of command line.
This approach works because '&' introduces a new command on the same line.
Comments with percent signs %= comment =%
There exists a comment style with percent signs.
In reality these are variables but they are expanded to nothing.
But the advantage is that they can be placed in the same line, even without &.
The equal sign ensures, that such a variable can't exists.
echo Mytest
set "var=3" %= This is a comment in the same line=%
The percent style is recommended for batch macros, as it doesn't change the runtime behaviour, as the comment will be removed when the macro is defined.
set $test=(%\n%
%=Start of code=% ^
echo myMacro%\n%
)
Performance REM vs :: vs %= =%
In short:
:: and %= =% seems to have the same performance
REM takes ~ 50% more time than ::
In blocks, especially loops only REM consumes time, but :: is removed from the cached block when the block is parsed, therefore it consumes no time
For more info see SO: Question about Comments in Batch *.bat files and speed
This answer attempts a pragmatic summary of the many great answers on this page:
jeb's great answer deserves special mention, because it really goes in-depth and covers many edge cases.
Notably, he points out that a misconstructed variable/parameter reference such as %~ can break any of the solutions below - including REM lines.
Whole-line comments - the only directly supported style:
REM (or case variations thereof) is the only official comment construct, and is the safest choice - see Joey's helpful answer.
:: is a (widely used) hack, which has pros and cons:
Pros:
Visual distinctiveness and, possibly, ease of typing.
Speed, although that will probably rarely matter - see jeb's great answer and Rob van der Woude's excellent blog post.
Cons:
Inside (...) blocks, :: can break the command, and the rules for safe use are restrictive and not easy to remember - see below.
If you do want to use ::, you have these choices:
Either: To be safe, make an exception inside (...) blocks and use REM there, or do not place comments inside (...) altogether.
Or: Memorize the painfully restrictive rules for safe use of :: inside (...), which are summarized in the following snippet:
#echo off
for %%i in ("dummy loop") do (
:: This works: ONE comment line only, followed by a DIFFERENT, NONBLANK line.
date /t
REM If you followed a :: line directly with another one, the *2nd* one
REM would generate a spurious "The system cannot find the drive specified."
REM error message and potentially execute commands inside the comment.
REM In the following - commented-out - example, file "out.txt" would be
REM created (as an empty file), and the ECHO command would execute.
REM :: 1st line
REM :: 2nd line > out.txt & echo HERE
REM NOTE: If :: were used in the 2 cases explained below, the FOR statement
REM would *break altogether*, reporting:
REM 1st case: "The syntax of the command is incorrect."
REM 2nd case: ") was unexpected at this time."
REM Because the next line is *blank*, :: would NOT work here.
REM Because this is the *last line* in the block, :: would NOT work here.
)
Emulation of other comment styles - inline and multi-line:
Note that none of these styles are directly supported by the batch language, but can be emulated.
Inline comments:
* The code snippets below use ver as a stand-in for an arbitrary command, so as to facilitate experimentation.
* To make SET commands work correctly with inline comments, double-quote the name=value part; e.g., SET "foo=bar".[1]
In this context we can distinguish two subtypes:
EOL comments ([to-the-]end-of-line), which can be placed after a command, and invariably extend to the end of the line (again, courtesy of jeb's answer):
ver & REM <comment> takes advantage of the fact that REM is a valid command and & can be used to place an additional command after an existing one.
ver & :: <comment> works too, but is really only usable outside of (...) blocks, because its safe use there is even more limited than using :: standalone.
Intra-line comments, which be placed between multiple commands on a line or ideally even inside of a given command.
Intra-line comments are the most flexible (single-line) form and can by definition also be used as EOL comments.
ver & REM^. ^<comment^> & ver allows inserting a comment between commands (again, courtesy of jeb's answer), but note how < and > needed to be ^-escaped, because the following chars. cannot be used as-is: < > | (whereas unescaped & or && or || start the next command).
%= <comment> =%, as detailed in dbenham's great answer, is the most flexible form, because it can be placed inside a command (among the arguments).
It takes advantage of variable-expansion syntax in a way that ensures that the expression always expands to the empty string - as long as the comment text contains neither % nor :
Like REM, %= <comment> =% works well both outside and inside (...) blocks, but it is more visually distinctive; the only down-sides are that it is harder to type, easier to get wrong syntactically, and not widely known, which can hinder understanding of source code that uses the technique.
Multi-line (whole-line block) comments:
James K's answer shows how to use a goto statement and a label to delimit a multi-line comment of arbitrary length and content (which in his case he uses to store usage information).
Zee's answer shows how to use a "null label" to create a multi-line comment, although care must be taken to terminate all interior lines with ^.
Rob van der Woude's blog post mentions another somewhat obscure option that allows you to end a file with an arbitrary number of comment lines: An opening ( only causes everything that comes after to be ignored, as long as it doesn't contain a ( non-^-escaped) ), i.e., as long as the block is not closed.
[1] Using SET "foo=bar" to define variables - i.e., putting double quotes around the name and = and the value combined - is necessary in commands such as SET "foo=bar" & REM Set foo to bar., so as to ensure that what follows the intended variable value (up to the next command, in this case a single space) doesn't accidentally become part of it.
(As an aside: SET foo="bar" would not only not avoid the problem, it would make the double quotes part of the value).
Note that this problem is inherent to SET and even applies to accidental trailing whitespace following the value, so it is advisable to always use the SET "foo=bar" approach.
Another alternative is to express the comment as a variable expansion that always expands to nothing.
Variable names cannot contain =, except for undocumented dynamic variables like
%=ExitCode% and %=C:%. No variable name can ever contain an = after the 1st position. So I sometimes use the following to include comments within a parenthesized block:
::This comment hack is not always safe within parentheses.
(
%= This comment hack is always safe, even within parentheses =%
)
It is also a good method for incorporating in-line comments
dir junk >nul 2>&1 && %= If found =% echo found || %= else =% echo not found
The leading = is not necessary, but I like if for the symmetry.
There are two restrictions:
1) the comment cannot contain %
2) the comment cannot contain :
After I realized that I could use label :: to make comments and comment out code REM just looked plain ugly to me. As has been mentioned the double-colon can cause problems when used inside () blocked code, but I've discovered a work-around by alternating between the labels :: and :space
:: This, of course, does
:: not cause errors.
(
:: But
: neither
:: does
: this.
)
It's not ugly like REM, and actually adds a little style to your code.
So outside of code blocks I use :: and inside them I alternate between :: and :.
By the way, for large hunks of comments, like in the header of your batch file, you can avoid special commands and characters completely by simply gotoing over your comments. This let's you use any method or style of markup you want, despite that fact that if CMD ever actually tried to processes those lines it'd throw a hissy.
#echo off
goto :TopOfCode
=======================================================================
COOLCODE.BAT
Useage:
COOLCODE [/?] | [ [/a][/c:[##][a][b][c]] INPUTFILE OUTPUTFILE ]
Switches:
/? - This menu
/a - Some option
/c:## - Where ## is which line number to begin the processing at.
:a - Some optional method of processing
:b - A third option for processing
:c - A forth option
INPUTFILE - The file to process.
OUTPUTFILE - Store results here.
Notes:
Bla bla bla.
:TopOfCode
CODE
.
.
.
Use what ever notation you wish *'s, #'s etc.
This page tell that using "::" will be faster under certain constraints
Just a thing to consider when choosing
good question... I've been looking for this functionality for long too...
after several tests and tricks it seem the better solution is the more obvious one...
--> best way I found to do it, preventing parser integrity fail, is reusing REM:
echo this will show until the next REM &REM this will not show
you can also use multiline with the "NULL LABEL" trick...
(dont forget the ^ at the end of the line for continuity)
::(^
this is a multiline^
comment... inside a null label!^
dont forget the ^caret at the end-of-line^
to assure continuity of text^
)
James K, I'm sorry I was wrong in a fair portion of what I said. The test I did was the following:
#ECHO OFF
(
:: But
: neither
:: does
: this
:: also.
)
This meets your description of alternating but fails with a ") was unexpected at this time." error message.
I did some farther testing today and found that alternating isn't the key but it appears the key is having an even number of lines, not having any two lines in a row starting with double colons (::) and not ending in double colons. Consider the following:
#ECHO OFF
(
: But
: neither
: does
: this
: cause
: problems.
)
This works!
But also consider this:
#ECHO OFF
(
: Test1
: Test2
: Test3
: Test4
: Test5
ECHO.
)
The rule of having an even number of comments doesn't seems to apply when ending in a command.
Unfortunately this is just squirrelly enough that I'm not sure I want to use it.
Really, the best solution, and the safest that I can think of, is if a program like Notepad++ would read REM as double colons and then would write double colons back as REM statements when the file is saved. But I'm not aware of such a program and I'm not aware of any plugins for Notepad++ that does that either.
A very detailed and analytic discussion on the topic is available on THIS page
It has the example codes and the pros/cons of different options.
There are a number of ways to comment in a batch file
1)Using rem
This is the official way. It apparently takes longer to execute than ::, although it apparently stops parsing early, before the carets are processed. Percent expansion happens before rem and :: are identified, so incorrect percent usage i.e. %~ will cause errors if percents are present. Safe to use anywhere in code blocks.
2)Using labels :, :: or :; etc.
For :: comment, ': comment' is an invalid label name because it begins with an invalid character. It is okay to use a colon in the middle of a label though. If a space begins at the start of label, it is removed : label becomes :label. If a space or a colon appears in the middle of the label, the rest of the name is not interpreted meaning that if there are two labels :f:oo and :f rr, both will be interpreted as :f and only the later defined label in the file will be jumped to. The rest of the label is effectively a comment. There are multiple alternatives to ::, listed here. You can never goto or call a ::foo label. goto :foo and goto ::foo will not work.
They work fine outside of code blocks but after a label in a code block, invalid or not, there has to be a valid command line. :: comment is indeed another valid command. It interprets it as a command and not a label; the command has precedence. Which is the command to cd to the :: volume, which will work if you have executed subst :: C:\, otherwise you get a cannot find the volume error. That's why :; is arguably better because it cannot be interpreted in this way, and therefore is interpreted as a label instead, which serves as the valid command. This is not recursive, i.e, the next label does not need a command after it. That's why they come in twos.
You need to provide a valid command after the label e.g. echo something. A label in a code block has to come with at least one valid command, so the lines come in pairs of two. You will get an unexpected ) error if there is a space or a closing parenthesis on the next line. If there is a space between the two :: lines you will get an invalid syntax error.
You can also use the caret operator in the :: comment like so:
#echo off
echo hello
(
:;(^
this^
is^
a^
comment^
)
:;
)
:;^
this^
is^
a^
comment
:;
)
But you need the trailing :; for the reason stated above.
#echo off
(
echo hello
:;
:; comment
:; comment
:;
)
echo hello
It is fine as long as there is an even number. This is undoubtedly the best way to comment -- with 4 lines and :;. With :; you don't get any errors that need to be suppressed using 2> nul or subst :: C:\. You could use subst :: C:\ to make the volume not found error go away but it means you will have to also put C: in the code to prevent your working directory from becoming ::\.
To comment at the end of a line you can do
command &:: or command & rem comment, but there still has to be an even number, like so:
#echo off
(
echo hello & :;yes
echo hello & :;yes
:;
)
echo hello
The first echo hello & :;yes has a valid command on the next line but the second & :;yes does not, so it needs one i.e. the :;.
3)Using an invalid environment variable
%= comment =%. In a batch file, environment variables that are not defined are removed from the script. This makes it possible to use them at the end of a line without using &. It is custom to use an invalid environment variable i.e. one that contains an equals sign. The extra equals is not required but makes it look symmetrical. Also, variable names starting with "=" are reserved for undocumented dynamic variables. Those dynamic variables never end with "=", so by using an "=" at both the start and end of the comment, there is no possibility of a name clash. The comment cannot contain % or :.
#echo off
echo This is an example of an %= Inline Comment =% in the middle of a line.
4)As a command, redirecting stderr to nul
#echo off
(
echo hello
;this is a comment 2> nul
;this is another comment 2> nul
)
5)At the end of a file, everything after an unclosed parenthesis is a comment
#echo off
(
echo hello
)
(this is a comment
this is a comment
this is a comment
I'm creating a simple program that will echo variables from SET /p strings into a nice, neat list. However, I am having trouble creating 2 working IF statements, one using NOT, and one using == to detect if one of my variables, %pwad%, is empty, or contains values. I want to use what the IF statement returns to set variable %finalpwad% to either "No pwad detected" or %pwad%.
How should I properly write this statement? Where might I need corrections, fixing the IF statements or maybe even the part where it sets %pwad% to %finalpwad%?
I have already tried fixing my call part and what they call from, but to no avail. I'm almost sure this is an IF statement issue, as I'm not too good with them, and always struggle reading the notes about the command from IF /?.
Here's a snippet of my code and the source of the problem I am having:
set /p pwad=Set a pwad (or none):
if %pwad% NOT [] call :yespwad & pause
if %pwad% == [] :nopwad & pause
:nopwad
set finalpwad=No pwad detected
goto :printout
:yespwad
set finalpwad=%pwad%
goto :printout
I expect the output to continue onto :printout, where it echoes all the variables the user enters, but it instead exits the program, and makes it so I can't find out whether it properly read my IF NOT or IF == statements. I rudimentarily added pauses to snuff out the problem and see where the source was, and I concluded it must the IF statements.
The help file clearly shows the proper syntax for comparing strings.
IF [NOT] string1==string2 command
It is recommended that you use quotes as well when comparing strings.
IF "string1"=="string2" command
IF comparisons are literal. Each side of the comparison has to match. Using brackets does not check for an empty string.
There also is an option to check if a variable is defined.
IF DEFINED VAR command
Looking at your logic you could essentially do this:
#echo off
set /p "pwad=Set a pwad (or none): "
IF DEFINED pwad (
set "finalpwad=%pwad%"
) ELSE (
set "finalpwad=No pwad detected"
)
i'm trying to write an integer to a file using redirection in batch,but i can't seem to do it.All i get is empty lines.
set var_1=0
echo %var_1%>output.txt
The same happens when i try to write numbers directly without declaring a variable first.
although this is not the case when i use two digit numbers or more.
Any solution to this?
Already tried
set var_1=100
set /a var_1=0
echo %var_1%>output.txt
Didn't know why i even tried this but i did it and the problem persist.
Thank you in advance.
Update : * I've already found a solution to this after a lot of searching *
For those who are interested to the solution and explaination :
http://www.dostips.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4668
Problem with a digit directly before the redirector.
try
>filename echo 0
1>nul redirects standard output to nul (suppresses output)
2>nul redirects standard error to nul (suppresses error messages)
0 is standard input
3..9 similarly affected, nul can be a filename if desired.
If you try this at the console you see what is going on , you get something like
ECHO is on (aan).
Which means your 0 is neglected because the console sees it as a kind of null.
Use this instead, the space does the trick
echo %var_1% > output.txt
I've recently been trying to make a program to simply store text to a file for later viewing, storing it as a .rar file for security against those who don't understand how to extract the text from the .rar (i.e. the less "techy" people)...
I have, however, encountered an error in the program that results in the <word> not expected at this time followed by the .exe closing when I input add/<word> <word>... (i.e. any multi-word string with spaces in between the words [add/<word>, however, does function properly]).
Is there a special rule that must be followed for storing multi-word strings to a .rar or a file in general (I do, however, know that there is a rule for creating/renaming folders/directories)?
The Program Segment:
:command
cls
set /p journal=<journal.rar
echo %journal%
echo.
set /p command=What would you like to do?
cls
if %command%==exit exit
if %command%==help goto help
if %command%==delete echo START; > journal.rar
if %command:~0,4%==add/ echo "%journal%""%command:~4%;" > journal.rar
if %command:~0,5%==edit/ echo %journal:%command:~5%=%;" > journal.rar
goto command
Excuse me. Your question is not clear. There are several confusing points in it, like "followed by the .exe closing" (which .exe is closing?), and the fact that your question is NOT related to .rar files in any way, nor to "storing multi-word strings". However, I can see the following points in it:
When a variable value is expanded with percent signs this way: %command% you must be aware that the variable is first expanded and then the resulting line is parsed. This mean that the value of the variable may introduce errors in the line. For example, in this line: if %command%==exit exit, if the value of command variable is add/one two three, then the line that is parsed is this: if add/one two three==exit exit that, of course, issue an error! (type if /? for further details).
The way to avoid this problem is enclosing both the variable and the comparison value in quotes; this way, if the value have several words with spaces, the whole value is grouped in the IF command for comparison purposes: if "%command%" == "exit" exit. This must be done in every IF command that use the value of the variable.
In the following line:
if %command:~0,5%==edit/ echo %journal:%command:~5%=%;" > journal.rar
you must be aware that the line is parsed from left to right; this means that you can not nest a %variable% expansion inside another one. The way to solve this problem is first complete a %normal% variable expansion, and then a !delayed! variable expansion that will take the previous expanded value. To do that, insert this line at beginning of your program:
setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
and change previous line by this one:
if "%command:~0,5%" == "edit/" echo !journal:%command:~5%=!;" > journal.rar
For further details, type set /? and carefully read the sections about "delayed expansion".
Here is a sample that can accept multiple words:
set "command="
set /p "command=What would you like to do? "
cls
if /i "%command%"=="have lunch" goto :food
So basicly, is there any way to make it so a Batch file doesnt need an exact answer to do an action. For example:
if %c%=images goto :images
The above means that I must type in the exact word, images, and if I add any more words it wont go to the :images label. How would I make it to go to a label using just a word from a sentence that you input.
For example if it asks me:
Where would you like to go?
And I say:
The image section please.
Then it takes me to the image section without the need for just saying image.
Is this possible?
You could use find.
echo %c% | find /i "image" >NUL && goto images
That'll also provide case-insensitive matching. Furthermore, you can similarly use findstr to match based on a regular expression if you need finer tuning of your match.
If you're curious about how the | and && above do their magic, see command redirection for more info.
There's a similar question here: Batch file: Find if substring is in string (not in a file)
The accepted answer could work in your case:
if /i "%c:image=%" neq "%c%" goto images
This technique uses string substitution to replace the word image with nothing (strip the word from the string you're searching), then compare it to the original string. If they're different, then the substring was found.