I'm not a graphics person, but I want to learn silverlight development.
Which expression product am I looking at here? Blend or studio or is vs.net 2008 all I need?
The studio as a whole is great and you can also do stuff with VS but you are probably looking for Expression Blend.
Blend is the product I've been using for silverlight. You can work with just visual studio 2008, but Bend can make the vector graphics much easier to make.
For the developer side of silverlight Visual Studio is all you need. For the designer side Expression Blend is what you will want.
Basically the visusl studio designer is read only meaning you have to write all the xaml by hand, blend gives you the ability to drag drop components and generally make creating the UI easier. (When compared to hand coding XAML)
Related
I'm a WPF developer and use VS Pro 2012 everyday for UI adjusting and coding. I installed Blend for Visual Studio but I never used it (just launched it by accident several times).
I'm afraid that I missed something by not using Blend. If I did miss something, what is it then?
Blend lets you design WPF UI, create controls and determine their behaviors visually (by UI), and Visual studio lets you do that programatically.
There is nothing you can do in blend, that you can't do in visual studio.
It is a tool for people who are less comfortable using code, and more comfortable using a cool UI to create custom controls and behaviors and design thier UI
In Visual Studio 2012 and later, the WPF UI designer is Blend; it's actually loaded in the background and accessed through out-of-process COM interfaces. This is part of the reason its behavior can be a bit bizarre at times, why you get messages about being able to edit the XAML while the design surface is loading.
If you're used to VS form builders you're going to be fine with Visual Studio.
In my WPF App, I have designed the Form using Expression Blend. To my surprise, the rendering is quite different when I load the solution using Visual Studio 2008. What is even more surprising, when I run the application, the resulting UI is different from the rendering done by both VS and Blend. Though I have not provided by XAML code, but in general is this a known Issue?
This is most definitely a known issue. Visual Studio uses what's known as the Cider designer to render WPF code. It most definitely renders XAML differently from Blend. Cider in VS2008 is pretty terrible, but gets much better in 2010 (but is still pretty terrible compared to Blend). One of the main differences between Cider and Blend is that Cider will read the code behind file (*.xaml.cs) while Blend will completely ignore it. Another notable difference is that Cider doesn't really understand things like Visual States and Blend SDK Behaviors (especially when you mix the two) while Blend completely understands them.
If you're constructing your view classes where you set your DataContext in XAML and then provide design time data (using Blend or a view model locator), you'll find that there are very few differences between Blend and how something actually looks at runtime.
I started to play (just play, not to produce real life projects) with WPF since MSVS 2008 where WPF built-in designer (as far as I can remember) was extremely poor so if I wanted to create layout I had to dive deep into XAML tags. So I treated Expression Blend as temporary application developed to overcome limitations of MSVS those days.
MSVS 2010 provides much more powerfull designer so I forgot about Blend at all.
Is there Microsoft vision on Blend and MSVS designer as rival products, will designer replace Blend one day or any other vision how these products will share the market in the closest future?
May I treat MSVS WPF designer vs Blend evolution as MSVS intellisence compared to ReSharper one?
Blend is for more complicated designs, like storyboards and visual state managers etc, which is not possible currently in visual studio. Visual Studio provides basic functionality of editing needed for business/crud apps, but for high class animation and better rich graphics results, Visual Studio will never replace Blend.
For graphics designers, intellisense is of very low importance then richness in the graphics editor. Blend is for designing Themes, color schemes. Visual Studio is for writing code and business apps.
I use Visual Studio 2010 for WPF development of desktop apps. I edit my XAML with the visual editor, often tweaking it manually. My code-behind is C#. I haven't had any particular problems with this arrangement.
What are the advantages of Expression Blend over Visual Studio for editing XAML? Why is Expression Blend so expensive (it's more expensive than I paid for Visual Studio!!) Are there other full-featured XAML editors which are cheaper? (I'm not talking about free ones like kaxaml - those are too limited)
Thanks in advance.
Expression Blend does not come stand alone any longer; it is part of Expression Studio which also provides SketchFlow, Design, and a couple of other tools.
Visual Studio is geared towards the development aspect while Expression Blend is geared towards the design aspect. Building animations and performing binding all within the UI of Expression Blend is possible; not forcing you to modify the XAML by hand. You can however modify the XAML directly within Blend as you can the C# code behind as well.
I typically use Blend to lay out the UI and then make use of Visual Studio for the code behind and tweaking of the XAML. Blend is definitely a nice tool to have within your tool belt and I would recommend you download the trial to get a better understanding on the offering.
I find that the main advantage of Blend is that the UI makes it very, very easy to create complex animations and transitions - really gorgeous user experience things - but you need to spend some time 'learning' Blend to do it. To write the XAML in Visual Studio to create the same effects would be much more difficult - Blend does it much quicker, and you can preview the results instantly. It's not easy (if it's even possible - I've honestly not tried the more demanding stuff) with Visual Studio.
I'd like to move my project's ActiveX controls to (preferably) WPF or WinForms. My customers aren't expert .NET programmers, but they're able to use WinForms to do basic drag-drop to use my controls. I've experimented with the VS 2010 WPF designer, and it seems like the drag-drop experience is much less intuitive than WinForms.
Is it realistic to expect occasional programmers to be able to use the WPF designers in Visual Studio (or Expression Blend) to build these kinds of simple GUI's? Also, what's the simplest available WPF designer?
It depends on how familiar you are with WPF or WinForms.
WPF has many advantages (full transparency support, etc.), but surely is more complex than WinForms.
In addition, WPF comes with a totally new programming experience: Without using patterns like MVVM you soon will be lost as things don't work as in WinForms.
To your customers:
If they are able to target at least .NET 3.0 you can provider wrapper controls using System.Windows.Forms.Integration.ElementHost.
Thus, they could profit from using everything "as before" and you could profit from a more powerful UI-API.
Expression Blend is a much better WPF designer then Visual Studio 2008. Visual Studio 2010 is slightly better than 2008, but Expression Blend has either Visual Studio version beat.