Django Models - Conditionally adding an object to a ManyToManyField before saving - django-models

The following does not quite work, its purpose is:
Upon save, check for the existence of 'supervisor' in the 'operators', and add it too them if not.
class JobRecord(models.Model):
"""JobRecord model"""
project = models.ForeignKey(Project)
date = models.DateField()
supervisor = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name='supervisor_set')
operators = models.ManyToManyField(User, related_name='operators_set', help_text='Include the supervisor here also.')
vehicles = models.ManyToManyField(Vehicle, blank=True, null=True)
def __unicode__(self):
return u"%s - %s" % (self.project.name, self.date.strftime('%b %d'))
# --- over ride methods ---- #
def save(self, **kwargs):
# this must be done to get a pk
super(JobRecord, self).save(**kwargs)
# which makes this comparison possible
if self.supervisor not in self.operators.__dict__:
self.operators.add(self.supervisor)
# it seems to get this far ok, but alas, the second save attempt
# does not seem to work!
print self.operators.values()
super(JobRecord, self).save(**kwargs)
Thanks for your expertise, would be 'expert'!

You can do something like this to check if the supervisor is in the operators:
if self.operators.filter(id=self.supervisor.id).count() == 0:
And you don't need to save a second time after modifying the many to many field. (Many to many relations are stored in their own table.)

Ok, I've modified the to make the following. Actually, either conditional seems to do the trick. The issue now is that the add() method is not working for me.
#...
def save(self, **kwargs):
super(JobRecord, self).save(**kwargs)
if self.operators.filter(id=self.supervisor.id).count() == 0:
#if self.supervisor not in self.operators.values():
# either conditional will get to this point
self.operators.add(self.supervisor) # <-- this line doesn't save proper?

i have the same issue. if you are using a django form, do your check after the form is saved, and then add the many to many there. that was the only way i could get around it.

Related

What is "current_account.people.find" in Rails strong parameter example?

I am new to Rails and am currently learning strong parameters in Rails 4 and following the below example from the official documentation:
`class PeopleController < ActionController::Base
# Using "Person.create(params[:person])" would raise an
# ActiveModel::ForbiddenAttributes exception because it'd
# be using mass assignment without an explicit permit step.
# This is the recommended form:
def create
Person.create(person_params)
end
# This will pass with flying colors as long as there's a person key in the
# parameters, otherwise it'll raise an ActionController::MissingParameter
# exception, which will get caught by ActionController::Base and turned
# into a 400 Bad Request reply.
def update
redirect_to current_account.people.find(params[:id]).tap { |person|
person.update!(person_params)
}
end
private
# Using a private method to encapsulate the permissible parameters is
# just a good pattern since you'll be able to reuse the same permit
# list between create and update. Also, you can specialize this method
# with per-user checking of permissible attributes.
def person_params
params.require(:person).permit(:name, :age)
end
end`
Question 1:
What does current_account.people.find mean inside the update method?
Question 2:
Could someone please explain the person_params method. What is "params" inside the person_params method?
current_account is a most likely a private method that returns an Account instance. current_account.people.find(params[:id]) searches the people table for a person that belongs to the current_account and has an ID of params[:id]. Object#tap is a ruby method that yields a block with the current object, and then returns that object. In this case, the Person instance is updated inside the block and the returned from tap. Finally, redirect_to is a controller method that will redirect the request to a different path. redirect_to can take many different types of arguments, including an ActiveRecord model, a string, or a symbol. Passing it an ActiveRecord model will redirect the request to the model's resource path, which is defined in routes.rb. In this case, that path will most likely be /people/:id.
The params object is a hash containing parameter names and values. For example, the request /people?name=Joe&age=34 will result in the following params object: {name: 'Joe', age: '34'}.

wxPython: get data in variables from Google Spreadsheet and also from user, work with all variables, return results to user

I hope I didn't miss any topic that could answer my problem. I'm here now because I'm terribly frustrated and tired with the following task:
- I have a Spreasheet with Drive.Google with lots of data in it
- I would like to create an application with wxPython that would pull data from this spreeadsheet (in the most easy way possible)
- Would also like to get multiple data from a user who will access this application through a nice interface (panel aka window)
- The multiple data introduced by the user should be able to work with the data pulled out from the Spreasheet. For example to see if the data introduced by the user is in the Spreadsheet or not and also some other operations with the next data introduced by the user.
- Finally and most importantly show the results to the user (later I would also like to add some functions to save somehow the results)
I hope I managed to express clearly what I would like to do. Now I'm new to Google API's, Python adn wxPython, but I have experience with C++ , php, html .
I've spent 2 weeks now with discovering Drive.Google and learning Python and wxPython. I did follow all tuturials on these, made my notes, read tones of stackoverflow questions-answers, wiki.wxpython.org etc. I learn every single day and I can do now many things separately but to have all functions like I described above I just couldn't work out how to do. At least please orient me in the direction. Awfel lot of times I spend hours doing examples and getting nowhere. I have Python, wxPython extention, GoogleAppEngine Launcher and even pyCharm demo. Please be kind. This is my first question ever.
here's the mess I made so far combining relevant examples:
import wx
import gdata.docs
import gdata.docs.service
import gdata.spreadsheet.service
import re, os
class Form(wx.Panel):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(Form, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.createControls()
self.bindEvents()
self.doLayout()
self.spreasht()
def createControls(self):
self.logger = wx.TextCtrl(self, style=wx.TE_MULTILINE|wx.TE_READONLY)
self.saveButton = wx.Button(self, label="Elvegzes")
self.nameLabel = wx.StaticText(self, label="type Name1:")
self.nameTextCtrl = wx.TextCtrl(self, value="type here")
self.name2Label = wx.StaticText(self, label="type Name2:")
self.name2TextCtrl = wx.TextCtrl(self, value="type here")
def bindEvents(self):
for control, event, handler in \
[(self.saveButton, wx.EVT_BUTTON, self.onSave),
(self.nameTextCtrl, wx.EVT_TEXT, self.onNameEntered),
(self.nameTextCtrl, wx.EVT_CHAR, self.onNameChanged)]:
control.Bind(event, handler)
def doLayout(self):
raise NotImplementedError
def spreadsht(self):
gd_client = gdata.spreadsheet.service.SpreadsheetsService()
gd_client.email = 'my email address'
gd_client.password = 'my password to it'
gd_client.source = 'payne.org-example-1'
gd_client.ProgrammaticLogin()
q = gdata.spreadsheet.service.DocumentQuery()
q['title'] = 'stationcenter'
q['title-exact'] = 'true'
feed = gd_client.GetSpreadsheetsFeed(query=q)
spreadsheet_id = feed.entry[0].id.text.rsplit('/',1)[1]
feed = gd_client.GetWorksheetsFeed(spreadsheet_id)
worksheet_id = feed.entry[0].id.text.rsplit('/',1)[1]
al1 = raw_input('Name1: ')
print al1
al2 = raw_input('Name2: ')
print al2
rows = gd_client.GetListFeed(spreadsheet_id, worksheet_id).entry
for row in rows:
for key in row.custom:
if al1 == row.custom[key].text:
print ' %s: %s' % (key, row.custom[key].text)
def onColorchanged(self, event):
self.__log('User wants color: %s'%self.colors[event.GetInt()])
def onReferrerEntered(self, event):
self.__log('User entered referrer: %s'%event.GetString())
def onSave(self,event):
self.__log('User clicked on button with id %d'%event.GetId())
def onNameEntered(self, event):
self.__log('User entered name: %s'%event.GetString())
def onNameChanged(self, event):
self.__log('User typed character: %d'%event.GetKeyCode())
event.Skip()
def onInsuranceChanged(self, event):
self.__log('User wants insurance: %s'%bool(event.Checked()))
# Helper method(s):
def __log(self, message):
''' Private method to append a string to the logger text
control. '''
self.logger.AppendText('%s\n'%message)
class FormWithSizer(Form):
def doLayout(self):
''' Layout the controls by means of sizers. '''
boxSizer = wx.BoxSizer(orient=wx.HORIZONTAL)
gridSizer = wx.FlexGridSizer(rows=5, cols=2, vgap=10, hgap=10)
# Prepare some reusable arguments for calling sizer.Add():
expandOption = dict(flag=wx.EXPAND)
noOptions = dict()
emptySpace = ((0, 0), noOptions)
# Add the controls to the sizers:
for control, options in \
[(self.nameLabel, noOptions),
(self.nameTextCtrl, expandOption),
(self.allomas2Label, noOptions),
(self.allomas2TextCtrl, expandOption),
emptySpace,
(self.saveButton, dict(flag=wx.ALIGN_CENTER))]:
gridSizer.Add(control, **options)
for control, options in \
[(gridSizer, dict(border=5, flag=wx.ALL)),
(self.logger, dict(border=5, flag=wx.ALL|wx.EXPAND,
proportion=1))]:
boxSizer.Add(control, **options)
self.SetSizerAndFit(boxSizer)
class FrameWithForms(wx.Frame):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(FrameWithForms, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
notebook = wx.Notebook(self)
form2 = FormWithSizer(notebook)
notebook.AddPage(form2, 'CALTH')
self.SetClientSize(notebook.GetBestSize())
if __name__ == '__main__':
app = wx.App(0)
frame = FrameWithForms(None, title='Relevant title˝')
frame.Show()
app.MainLoop()
THANK YOU AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!
First, make sure you can download the data you want with just Python. Then create a wxPython GUI with a single button. In that button's handler, have it call the script that can download the data you want.
If that causes your GUI to become unresponsive, then you'll need to use a thread to do the downloading. I recommend the following articles if that's the case:
http://www.blog.pythonlibrary.org/2010/05/22/wxpython-and-threads/
http://wiki.wxpython.org/LongRunningTasks
Okay, so now you have the data downloading appropriately. Now you add a grid widget or a listctrl / object list view widget. Pick one of those. I prefer object list view, which you can read about here. Then in your button handler you can call your downloader script or thread and when that's done, you can load the widget with that data. If you're using a thread, then the thread will have to call the next step (i.e. the widget loading bit).
Now you should have your data displayed. All that's left is making it look pretty and maybe putting the downloading part into a menu item.

How to make references between expando models?

Update
This was my best effort creating the following scheme
user = self.auth.store.user_model.create_user(email,
password_raw=newpasswd)
if not user[0]: # user is a tuple
return user[1] # Error message
else:
# User is created, let's try making the references
okuser = auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(user[1].key.id()))
okuser.sponsor = auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(sponsor_id)).auth_ids
Original question
How can I make a selfreference with an expando class to indicate which User is the "sponsor" of which? The "sponsor" is the one who invited the new User so at creation we must store that and it would be much neater to store it as a referenceproperty than a string or a stringlist.
I can create a new user but I don't know how to make a reference so that I can tell for one User who another User is who is the sponsor of the first user and I suppose a way to model this is with selfreferenceproperty since both objects are users but the complication is that it is an expando model so I don't know how to use the reference property. Could you tell me how to do it or give me a clue how I can solve this problem in the best way?
user = self.auth.store.user_model.create_user(email,
password_raw=newpasswd)
if not user[0]: # user is a tuple
return user[1] # Error message
else:
# User is created, let's try making the reference
okuser = auth_models.User.get_by_id(user[1].key.id())
okuser.sponsor = db.SelfReferenceProperty(User,
collection_name='matched_images', verbose_name='Sponsor')
I don't know how to do the last part, to store the actual referenceproperty with an epando model. How can it be done?
Update
It seems it can't be done:
NotImplementedError: Property sponsor does not support <class 'google.appengine.ext.db.ReferenceProperty'> types.
Code:
user = self.auth.store.user_model.create_user(email,
password_raw=newpasswd)
if not user[0]: # user is a tuple
return user[1] # Error message
else:
# User is created, let's try redirecting to login page
okuser = auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(user[1].key.id()))
okuser.sponsor = db.SelfReferenceProperty(auth_models.User.get_by_id(sponsor_id),collection_name='matched_distributor')
okuser.put()
It forces me do use a string instead of a reference and then a solution is feasible:
user = self.auth.store.user_model.create_user(email,
password_raw=newpasswd)
if not user[0]: # user is a tuple
return user[1] # Error message
else:
# User is created, let's try redirecting to login page
okuser = auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(user[1].key.id()))
okuser.sponsor = sponsor_id
okuser.put()
You can't assign an instance of a Property class to an instance of a model - property classes define properties, they don't represent individual values.
By far the easiest way to do what you want is to add the property as you would on a regular model. Just because you're using expandos (why, by the way?) doesn't mean you can't have regular properties on them as well.

Django - Are model save() methods lazy?

Are model save() methods lazy in django?
For instance, at what line in the following code sample will django hit the database?
my_model = MyModel()
my_model.name = 'Jeff Atwood'
my_model.save()
# Some code that is independent of my_model...
model_id = model_instance.id
print (model_id)
It does not make much sense to have a lazy save, does it? Django's QuerySets are lazy, the model's save method is not.
From the django source:
django/db/models/base.py, lines 424–437:
def save(self, force_insert=False, force_update=False, using=None):
"""
Saves the current instance. Override this in a subclass if you want to
control the saving process.
The 'force_insert' and 'force_update' parameters can be used to insist
that the "save" must be an SQL insert or update (or equivalent for
non-SQL backends), respectively. Normally, they should not be set.
"""
if force_insert and force_update:
raise ValueError("Cannot force both insert and updating in \
model saving.")
self.save_base(using=using, force_insert=force_insert,
force_update=force_update)
save.alters_data = True
Then, save_base does the heavy lifting (same file, lines 439–545):
...
transaction.commit_unless_managed(using=using)
...
And in django/db/transaction.py, lines 167–178, you'll find:
def commit_unless_managed(using=None):
"""
Commits changes if the system is not in managed transaction mode.
"""
...
P.S. All line numbers apply to django version (1, 3, 0, 'alpha', 0).

What is the best way to do AppEngine Model Memcaching?

Currently my application caches models in memcache like this:
memcache.set("somekey", aModel)
But Nicks' post at http://blog.notdot.net/2009/9/Efficient-model-memcaching suggests that first converting it to protobuffers is a lot more efficient. But after running some tests I found out it's indeed smaller in size, but actually slower (~10%).
Do others have the same experience or am I doing something wrong?
Test results: http://1.latest.sofatest.appspot.com/?times=1000
import pickle
import time
import uuid
from google.appengine.ext import webapp
from google.appengine.ext import db
from google.appengine.ext.webapp import util
from google.appengine.datastore import entity_pb
from google.appengine.api import memcache
class Person(db.Model):
name = db.StringProperty()
times = 10000
class MainHandler(webapp.RequestHandler):
def get(self):
self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/plain'
m = Person(name='Koen Bok')
t1 = time.time()
for i in xrange(int(self.request.get('times', 1))):
key = uuid.uuid4().hex
memcache.set(key, m)
r = memcache.get(key)
self.response.out.write('Pickle took: %.2f' % (time.time() - t1))
t1 = time.time()
for i in xrange(int(self.request.get('times', 1))):
key = uuid.uuid4().hex
memcache.set(key, db.model_to_protobuf(m).Encode())
r = db.model_from_protobuf(entity_pb.EntityProto(memcache.get(key)))
self.response.out.write('Proto took: %.2f' % (time.time() - t1))
def main():
application = webapp.WSGIApplication([('/', MainHandler)], debug=True)
util.run_wsgi_app(application)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
The Memcache call still pickles the object with or without using protobuf. Pickle is faster with a protobuf object since it has a very simple model
Plain pickle objects are larger than protobuf+pickle objects, hence they save time on Memcache, but there is more processor time in doing the protobuf conversion
Therefore in general either method works out about the same...but
The reason you should use protobuf is it can handle changes between versions of the models, whereas Pickle will error. This problem will bite you one day, so best to handle it sooner
Both pickle and protobufs are slow in App Engine since they're implemented in pure Python. I've found that writing my own, simple serialization code using methods like str.join tends to be faster since most of the work is done in C. But that only works for simple datatypes.
One way to do it more quickly is to turn your model into a dictionary and use the native eval / repr function as your (de)serializers -- with caution of course, as always with the evil eval, but it should be safe here given that there is no external step.
Below an example of a class Fake_entity implementing exactly that.
You first create your dictionary through fake = Fake_entity(entity) then you can simply store your data via memcache.set(key, fake.serialize()). The serialize() is a simple call to the native dictionary method of repr, with some additions if you need (e.g. add an identifier at the beginning of the string).
To fetch it back, simply use fake = Fake_entity(memcache.get(key)). The Fake_entity object is a simple dictionary whose keys are also accessible as attributes. You can access your entity properties normally, except referenceProperties give keys instead of fetching the object (which is actually quite useful). You can also get() the actual entity with fake.get(), or more interestigly, change it and then save with fake.put().
It does not work with lists (if you fetch multiple entities from a query), but could be easily be adjusted with join/split functions using an identifier like '### FAKE MODEL ENTITY ###' as the separator. Use with db.Model only, would need small adjustments for Expando.
class Fake_entity(dict):
def __init__(self, record):
# simple case: a string, we eval it to rebuild our fake entity
if isinstance(record, basestring):
import datetime # <----- put all relevant eval imports here
from google.appengine.api import datastore_types
self.update( eval(record) ) # careful with external sources, eval is evil
return None
# serious case: we build the instance from the actual entity
for prop_name, prop_ref in record.__class__.properties().items():
self[prop_name] = prop_ref.get_value_for_datastore(record) # to avoid fetching entities
self['_cls'] = record.__class__.__module__ + '.' + record.__class__.__name__
try:
self['key'] = str(record.key())
except Exception: # the key may not exist if the entity has not been stored
pass
def __getattr__(self, k):
return self[k]
def __setattr__(self, k, v):
self[k] = v
def key(self):
from google.appengine.ext import db
return db.Key(self['key'])
def get(self):
from google.appengine.ext import db
return db.get(self['key'])
def put(self):
_cls = self.pop('_cls') # gets and removes the class name form the passed arguments
# import xxxxxxx ---> put your model imports here if necessary
Cls = eval(_cls) # make sure that your models declarations are in the scope here
real_entity = Cls(**self) # creates the entity
real_entity.put() # self explanatory
self['_cls'] = _cls # puts back the class name afterwards
return real_entity
def serialize(self):
return '### FAKE MODEL ENTITY ###\n' + repr(self)
# or simply repr, but I use the initial identifier to test and eval directly when getting from memcache
I would welcome speed tests on this, I would assume this is quite faster than the other approaches. Plus, you do not have any risks if your models have changed somehow in the meantime.
Below an example of what the serialized fake entity looks like. Take a particular look at datetime (created) as well as reference properties (subdomain) :
### FAKE MODEL ENTITY ###
{'status': u'admin', 'session_expiry': None, 'first_name': u'Louis', 'last_name': u'Le Sieur', 'modified_by': None, 'password_hash': u'a9993e364706816aba3e25717000000000000000', 'language': u'fr', 'created': datetime.datetime(2010, 7, 18, 21, 50, 11, 750000), 'modified': None, 'created_by': None, 'email': u'chou#glou.bou', 'key': 'agdqZXJlZ2xlcgwLEgVMb2dpbhjmAQw', 'session_ref': None, '_cls': 'models.Login', 'groups': [], 'email___password_hash': u'chou#glou.bou+a9993e364706816aba3e25717000000000000000', 'subdomain': datastore_types.Key.from_path(u'Subdomain', 229L, _app=u'jeregle'), 'permitted': [], 'permissions': []}
Personally I also use static variables (faster than memcache) to cache my entities in the short term, and fetch the datastore when the server has changed or its memory has been flushed for some reason (which happens quite often in fact).

Resources