I have created Azure AD B2C Application and tried to integrate with React JS using MSAL Library , When i tried to get access token I am getting following error.
AADB2C90205: This application does not have sufficient permissions against this web resource to perform the operation
Any Help would highly appreciated.
The link provided by #Jas Suri is correct, but I need to add some more:
You need to create two applications, one representing the client application and the other representing the api application, and then use the client application to call the api application.
Next, you need to expose the api of the back-end application and record the scope name, then go to the client application to add the scope to the API permissions (you need to find it in My APIs), and grant the admin consent to the permission.
Finally, when you get the access token, you must add the scope.
You didn’t grant admin consent. Follow this:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/add-web-api-application?tabs=app-reg-ga
Specifically the Grant Permissions section.
Related
TL;DR
How can I delegate my user permissions to a service principal in Azure Ad when the usual interactive way (e.g. web app with consent screen popup) is not feasible? This is because I cannot configure the MSI in the Azure Portal properly to work that way.
More detail
I want to grant an application permission to access the Graph API on behalf of a user. Usually, this is a well-documented scenario in which you create an app registration, acquire delegated user permissions by asking permission for the needed scopes, and then use these permissions in the app.
The app that needs Graph access is a background service that is to work on its own without user intervention/activity. For this use case, the common approach is to use application permissions. In my case this is not feasible, because application permissions require admin-consent and are all-or-nothing kind of permissions. There is no way this will be granted for me. Rightfully so, because its overkill.
But on the other hand that's really a pity. A pity, because I've found an example on how to assign Graph API application permissions directly to a Managed Service Identity rather than to a self-registered app. And my service (as an Azure Functions app) already has a MSI assigned to it. So this would be the perfect fit, b then again, there is no way I'll get those application permissions.
So what is the workaround? We have this one user principal which has all the required permissions we need for our background service. What I want to do is to delegate this user's permissions to the Function App/MSI. In order to do this, I used this SPA-template by the MSAL team to have something that will prompt me the permissions popup.
This however failed because the implicit oauth flow was not enabled. To remedy this, you usually need to update the app manifest in the portal. However, since this is a MANAGED service identity, and not a self-registered one, the MSI is not listed in the portal under app registrations. So I cannot set this property to true.
Doing the same via Azure CLI also failed because apparently the MSI is not identified as an app.
az ad app update --oauth2-allow-implicit-flow true --id <appId_of_MSI>
This yields the following error:
ResourceNotFoundError: Resource '<appId_of_MSI>' does not exist or one of its queried reference-property objects are not present.
It shows fine when doing this
az ad sp show --id <appId_of_MSI>
So in summary: I cannot complete the process of delegating that user's permissions interactively. Is there any other way? Maybe via CLI?
The fallback the solution is to create a separate unmanaged/self-registered app identity. But I want to really avoid this because then I would need to manage and rotate client (app) credentials again, which the MSI took care of for me.
Why o why can't I just assign fine-scoped application permissions 😒
Any help on this is greatly appreciated. Cheers.
In my experience Managed Identities don't support the scenario you are suggesting.
They do not have an app registration and in that way cannot authenticate users interactively.
I would go with your fallback solution; a normal app registration and use that to access Graph API on behalf of the user.
This is what we do in our projects at least.
App permissions -> Managed Identity if possible. Delegated permissions -> normal app registration + secret/certificate in Key Vault, retrieved with Managed Identity.
I have a dotnet 5 Blazor Server-Side website deployed to Azure App Service. I've followed the tutorial at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/scenario-secure-app-authentication-app-service to provide Authentication. Now, any attempt to reach my site requires a login from a user of the Azure AD.
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find any guidance on how to manage Authorization though. For example, I'd like to restrict access to pages to members of specific groups within the Azure AD. I seem to remember years ago, there was some kind of membership provider database that the site would check.
The kind of thing I'm looking for is to be able to decorate the razor page with the name of an Azure AD group of which anyone attempting to load the page must be a member. Does anyone know of a link that describes the "official" way to achieve this?
Role-based access control (RBAC) a way to authorize applications based on the role permissions granted by the administrator to individual users/groups. Please refer this link for the detailed documentation on how to create/manage roles for an application in Azure AD.
Please refer this link for more details on how you can access the razor pages base on the roles assigned to the users/groups.
I'm getting 403 forbidden access when trying to fetch all the groups from Microsoft graph using ASP.NET Web API, and here is my code to get all the groups:
String jsonResponse = MicrosoftGraphHelper.MakeGetRequestForString (
String.Format("{0}users/{1}/memberOf",
MicrosoftGraphHelper.MicrosoftGraphV1BaseUri,
upn));
var userGroups = JsonConvert.Deser
What are the required permissions in both Delegated and Application tabs for fetching both users and groups? Do I need Application permissions since this is an API and my UI is deployed in azure separately? I'm confused with the list of permission options and with admin consents.
Firstly, here's a great read in case you haven't seen it yet.
Delegated permissions, Application permissions, and effective permissions - Microsoft Graph permissions reference.
What are the required permissions in both Delegated and Application tabs for fetching both users and groups?
You can understand the required permissions for each api by looking at relevant documentation. With the information you've shared in your question..
For users/{1}/memberOf it will be List memberOf
For getting all groups - List Groups
If it's just these two calls in your application, Directory.Read.All would be the least privilege required. In case there are other calls, look at their documentation.
Do I need Application permissions since this is an API and my UI is deployed in azure separately?
This will depend on whose context do you acquire the token to call Microsoft Graph API. Share a little more information on your code.. OAuth flow you use to acquire token and you might get better suggestions specific to your application. In general though,
If you acquire the token as a user, then Delegated permissions (Example if you acquire token by prompting the user for credentials and from a flow perspective if you're using say Authorization code or Implict grant flow)
If you acquire the token as an application, then Application permissions (Example if you use only clientId, clientSecret/certificate to acquire token using Client Credentials flow)
Admin Consent is required or not?
This depends on what permissions you finally end up deciding as required for your application.
You can see it directly in Azure portal.. when setting required permissions fro your application, each permission has a yes or no next to it to indicate whether Admin consent is required or not. Just as example see screenshot below.
Microsoft Graph Permissions Reference.. the first link I had shared has all permissions documented. Example here is one that is relevant for you.
I have been doing some R&D on using the MicrosoftGraphAPI to fetch the skus subscribed by my organization.
I have created an app as described in the documentation. I did all the steps in the above link except 'Assign application to role'.
Using postman am able to get the oauth2 token by sending a post request using the link
https://login.microsoftonline.com/<mytenantid>/oauth2/token
with the client_id, client_secret, resource(https://graph.microsoft.com) and grant_type(client_credentials) parameters.
After this token is obtained I can fire a get request https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/subscribedSkus with the Authorization header set as Bearer {token} which will return the SKUs subscribed by my organization.
So far so good. :-)
Now the requirement is I need to fetch the subscribed SKUs by one of the client (let's say having the azure ad tenant id 'ABCDEFG') of my organization.
I can successfully do that by registering an app in the client's tenant 'ABCDEFG' with the same steps as above.
This approach is fine if my organization has say 1 or 2 clients.
However, if the client numbers are more than say 30 this approach of registering an application in each Azure AD instance is not feasible.
If the application that I registered in my organizations AAD was multi-tenant then how should it help me?
What will be the steps needed to obtain the access token for each tenant?
Can somebody assist with some detailed explanation?
Since you need application-level access, you would assign one of the Application permissions listed in the documentation for getting SKUs: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/docs/api-reference/v1.0/api/subscribedsku_list.
Directory.Read.All, Directory.ReadWrite.All
In this case you should require the Read Directory Data (Directory.Read.All) application permission.
Then you mark your app as multi-tenanted.
Now then in order for another org to use your app, they will have to be on-boarded.
You will need some kind of page where their administrator can click a button/link to start using your app.
This should redirect the admin to:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/authorize?client_id=your-client-id&prompt=admin_consent&response_type=code+id_token&redirect_uri=url-where-to-send-user-back
Once they sign in, they will be presented with a consent screen, where they can approve the permissions that your app requires.
If and when they do that, they will be redirected back to your app (to the URL you specified) and you can use the Id token to know which Azure AD tenant registered.
During this process a service principal for your app is created in their tenant, and the required permission is granted to it.
This means you can then get an access token for their tenant from: (using the same credentials)
https://login.microsoftonline.com/their-tenant-id/oauth2/token
Remember that access tokens are specific to an Azure AD tenant, so you will have to get an access token for each tenant.
One thing I would like to point out is that you should instead try to use delegated permissions if possible.
The application permission given here gives quite large access to your app, and some admins might not use your service for that reason alone.
Delegated permissions are more complex to handle, but allow your app to act on behalf of a user instead of purely as itself.
I have a UWP app that uses WebAccountManager for AAD authentication. I also have a service, hosted in Azure, used by the UWP app. That service uses the token the UWP app sends to get another on-behalf-of token (I think that's what it's called) to then call other service APIs as the user (e.g. Microsoft Graph and Outlook REST API). In other words, UWP app calls WebAuthenticationCoreManager.RequestTokenAsync to get a token, sends it to my service, my service calls AuthenticationContext.AcquireTokenAsync to get an on-behalf-of token to use when calling the Outlook REST API, for example.
In the AAD registration for my service, the "Required Permissions" list all the services and permissions/API calls it might make on behalf of the user (E.g. "Microsoft Graph"-> "Have full access to user calendars")
When my UWP app creates the WebTokenRequest to pass into the RequestTokenAsync function, it currently passes an empty string as the value for "scope." What should it be passing for the scope parameter? Should it be passing the full and exact list of permissions that the service declares are required? If so, how do I get that permission list to the client? Just hard-code and update the list whenever the service required permissions list changes?
In Azure Active Directory, there are two fundamentally different ways to specify the permissions your app requires when authenticating.
Static Consent
Dynamic Consent
Back in the Azure Active Directory V1 endpoint, you would set "Required Permissions" to other APIs when registering your client application. This is setting up Static Consent. These permissions are fixed, and when you trigger the user to consent to these permissions, the user has to consent to them all at once. Additionally, if at some point your app wants to add new permissions to other APIs, you will need to force the user to go through the full consent experience again, which may even require special logic on your application.
This is why in the V2 endpoint, Microsoft developed Incremental and dynamic consent.
With the v2.0 endpoint, you can specify the permissions your app needs dynamically, at runtime, during regular usage of your app. To do so, you can specify the scopes your app needs at any given point in time by including them in the scope parameter of an authorization request.
Here, you can specify only the permissions your app needs to complete the flows it is trying to accomplish at that time. If you need more access, you can simply add it during your authentication experience, and it will prompt the user only for those new permissions.
Now let's return to your question. If you are using the V2 endpoint, you should be using Dynamic Consent, which means that the settings in "Required Permissions" do not really matter to you. You should be keeping the list of scopes your app requires in your app settings.
Some situations in the V2 endpoint still require Static Consent, like service to service calls with direct application permissions. For those situations you would pass the scope <resource>/.default as noted here. This might also work for delegated tokens, but it is better to just use Dynamic Consent.