I am exporting an Informatica Workflow but the sessions that are a part of it are not getting exported, although the mappings that are associated to these sessions are getting exported.
Is there some specific property that can block the session export?
It would be great if somebody can help me sort out this issue.
Better export the Workflow from Repository Manager. If you are exporting from Workflow manager the underlying dependent sessions and mapping may not get exported. Best practice is to export from Repository Manager
You need to export with Repository Manager not Workflow Manager.
Related
I am planning a project and I have the authentication with firebase but I want to have the other tables in another database. Could this option be viable?
A detected problem that could happen would be the duplication of data.
Has anyone done something similar?
At the moment I have not tried anything because I am planning the project, the only thing I have is the authentication with firebase.
I want to do this is because I need to have a local database because users will not have internet connection in many situations.
Thank you so much!!
I am working on a application developed by third party on salesforce , This is a managed package application. I have access to UAT org and some other orgs. When I tried to retrieve the packaged application metadata using salesforce Ant migration tool,I got all the components in the package retrieved successfully. But the content of this components is shown as "(Hidden)". I am not able to see any real code in this components.
Are there any access level restrictions on Managed package? if yes How can I know the restrictions?
Also It will be very great if someone can help with application life cycle management of a managed package application in salesforce. As I am new in this field , Please recommend any tools for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Managed packages are typically used by salesforce.com partners to distribute and sell applications to customers. The code of managed packages cannot be retrieved.
With the release of sonarqube 5.2, the decorator and batch components have been deprecated. Going through the code I found that they want us to use MeasureComputer instead.
Now, I had a plugin which needs the email settings of the sonar setup, fetch some basic user information and the assignee of each issue.
How do I access the email settings and user information?
Update
As per this JIRA ticket, the data associated to the analysis is sent to some compute engine which resides at the sonar server. This is where the issues are created, assigned e.t.c. So, the information regarding the issue will no longer be available even in some PostJob.
User finder alternative: I am now using the user web service to fetch information I require as far the author of the issue is concerned.
IssueFilter helps me lay my hands on each issue that is reported.
My purpose here is to create a custom report immediately after the analysis where a link to each issue is shown. I don't think I'll be able to achieve this using the sonar plugin.
We are developing a Grails web application, where different users (customers) need to be pointed at different databases containing only their organization's data. Unfortunately, the separated databases are a requirement, and we are being asked to be able to have only 1 web application for everybody.
However, Grails expects only a single datasource pool connecting to one database.
We want to be able switch database connections, per session, based on the user that is logged in, where the different connections are read in from properties files during the BootStrap init().
So far, we have been unable to find a solution that does not seem to have race conditions, there is no plugin we can find, and it doesn't seem to be a popular issue.
Our most promising was creating a custom dynamic data source, set up in Bootstrap to define a map of organization->dataSource, and utilizing a closure defined in Bootstrap to find the appropriate dataSource before GORM behavior, but this seems to cause race condition when there is latency.
Does anyone have an idea how this switching can legitimately be performed?
Thanks
Considering Grails is built upon Spring your best bet is to develop your own resolvable datasource.
Dynamic datasource routing
Example of datasource routing
It's not clear in your question if you're deploying your application once, and trying to configure the DataSource used by User, or if you just want to configure by deployment.
If it's just per deployment, Grails allow you to externalize the configuration. You can set this to use a file in the classpath or in a static location.
What would be a good way, and good practice when "integrating" an external SQL database, in a Sitecore project.
The Sitecore project will get alot of its content from this external database, which is maintained elsewhere, and is constantly updated. (so copying the external database or syncing, is not really prefered, and we dont plan on enriching the data either)
Are there some method of defining some objects and "pipelines" between the Sitecore, and the external database (say without having to use, too many webservices)
What you can do is create a custom Data Provider to connect to your external SQL database. This way you can expose the external data to Sitecore as if it were native data.
See When to Implement Data Providers in the Sitecore ASP.NET CMS for more information.
When we implement architecture like this, we would use a search index (like solr) for maintaining state of the external database and keep enough content to display lists.
I would then request the external source for the display of an "article".
Sitecore would own the web application, url and all page rendering definitions.
If you want to use DMS you might want to extend this further into having some items for referencing elements