I am creating an angular app with node js express as backend. The angular app receives database rows as json and populates it. The ajax part is incredibly fast and users exploit the server by frequently performing requests. I want to add a delay to ajax in nodejs. I use setTimeout() to purposefully wait in nodejs middleware before the rendering route is executed. But i want to know if this is performance friendly or derogatory and should it be avoided?
Node.js application should response as quickly as it can, or your requests will eat your memory.
You should add delay/restriction to client code, I believe.
Also, you should to setup your server to disallow flood requests (DDoS trying). Take a look to a toobusy package.
Well you're basically adding more work for the event loop, if you wish to create a fake delay, do it on the client side.
Related
I've been working as a full stack web developer for over a year now. Nextjs/golang is our stack. Today I realized that I have no idea whether we use CSR or SSR. I think we use CSR but I'm not sure. I've gone down rabbitholes on this topic like 100 times but its never stuck.
First question:
When they say server side, do they mean on the backend? i.e. golang? or does that mean on the nextjs server? Whenever someone says server I think backend but I don't think this is correct.
Second question:
How does client side rendering work? Like I know the server sends javascript to the client then the client uses the javascript to build the page. But all of this javascript must make a bunch of requests to the server to grab data and html right? Like how would the javascript build the page otherwise? Is this why react/nextjs is written in jsx? So the server can send all the JSX which is actually just javascript to the client then the client can build the html?
Third Question:
If CSR has the client build the page, how would this ever work? Like what about all of the data that needs to be pulled from our database for specific users / etc etc. That can't be done directly from the frontend.
I tried reading tons of articles online! Hasn't clicked yet
You said the essential thing yourself: in client-side rendering, "the server sends javascript to the client, then the client uses the javascript to build the page." Hold on to that one point – everything else is secondary. The client "renders."
Now that "client-side" rendering capabilities have become so powerful – and, so varied – it has generally become favored. If you "tell the client what to do and then let him do it," you are more likely to get a consistently favorable outcome for most clients. Yes, the client will issue perhaps-many AJAX requests in carrying out your instructions. That is irrelevant.
CSR - server sends HTML that contains links to javascript (script tags). Clients then loads and executes JS (JavaScript typically contains fetching code). That means that each client will perform several round trips to the server to get HTML and then the data.
SSR - server sends HTML and embeds the necessary data in it
The client already has the data and HTML, so it can render it. SSR does fetch on each request, meaning the client still gets the latest data.
Benefits of using SSR compared to CSR is lower load time, it makes the website feel "faster" and also improves the ranking by search engine bots. On the other hand, the server does the rendering, which increases its burden (though fewer requests decreases it).
SSG is the same as SSR but fetching occurs at build time, the result page is computed only once and returned for each request. It is possible to use SSG with or without data.
Use SSG if possible, then mostly SSR. In some occasions it may be better to use CSR instead of SSR, though I'm not experienced enough to give the answer when.
Now answering your questions:
Yes, SSR happens on the server. If you use fetch function then it will work on client. But if you use getServerSideProps or getStatisSideProps then it will work on server. You can read from the file system, fetch public API or query the database, whatever you do in getStatisSideProps, getServerSideProps will run on the server, before returning the response.
Yes, you're correct. Client need the data to render the page, so it has to send requests to server and then render.
The third question is the same as the second. I hope the long answer I gave clarified your confusion.
Sorry for long answer.
I'm sending data from my backend every 10 seconds and I wanted to display that data in reactjs. I've searched on the net to use socket.io to display real-time data. Is there a better way to use it?
If you're dead set on updating your data every 10 seconds, it would make more sense to make a request from the client to the server, as HTTP requests can only be opened from client to server. By using HTTP requests, you won't need to use socket.io, but socket.io is an easy alternative if you need much faster requests.
Depending on how you are generating the data being sent from your backend, specifically if you are using a database, there is most likely a way to subscribe to changes in the database. This would actually update the data in realtime, without a 10 second delay.
If you want a more detailed answer, you'll have to provide more detail regarding your question: what data are you sending? where is it coming from or how are you generating it?
I'm working on an autodialer feature, in which an agent will get a call when I trigger the button from the frontend (using react js language), and then automatically all the leads in the agent assigned portal will get back-to-back calls from agent number. However, because this process is automatic, the agent won't know who the agent has called, so I want to establish a real-time connection so that I can show a popup on the frontend that contains information about the lead who was called.
When I make a change to my Backbone web application code on my server, how can I make user's browsers update so they see those changes.
Being a SPA the page rarely if ever refreshes. So even if place hashes/timestamps on my script tags it still wont be adequate enough, ie, this isn't ideal IMO:
...
<script src="js/main.js?t=SOME_HASH"></script>
Does Backbone have a way to handle this?
Backbone being a JS framework that merely gives structure to your applications, it doesn't handle stuff like this. This is something that involves configuration of server and you need to tackle it yourself.
Since you said you have an SPA that rarely refreshes - Your app is probably contacting the server via lots of AJAX requests. You can add an interceptor to these requests on the server that checks if stuff changed on server and sends a shouldReload: true with the response.
You should also have an AJAX interceptor client side that checks for this in response and reloads the page/lets users know about updates on server and give option to reload/restart.
Another option is to implement websockets/polling so that server can push notification about changes to clients. socket.io is a plugin that uses web sockets and falls back to polling.
P.S: You also need to bust the cache as you mentioned in question
I am developing a website using AngularJS and NodeJS+Mysql on the server. The client makes many http calls but nodeJS and Sequelize seems to be quite slow. What should I do on both client and server to speed up the response time and rendering of my data?
Please give a demo code lines, It may be one of two possibilities for now -
1. You can refine your sql-queries
2. I used to see people make a database connection on every request that makes it too slow to response
You may be blocking nodejs. nodejs is single threaded. Ensure that you are using Asynchronous IO
I am starting to work with angular and am fascinated by the bi-directional data-binding capabilities and by its $http method, which lets me save changes in to my mysql database, without refreshing the page.
Another thing I am currently fascinated by is the real time capability across multiple clients using firebase. Here all clients are updated in REAL TIME, when the database receives any changes. I'd probably like to use firebase, but I would have to drop Laravel and MySql as a persistence layer entirely, which I would like to keep for the moment, since my application is already working in Laravel, just not in real time.
How would I go about having a Real Time application, which updates every client, without refreshing the view, in Laravel using MySQL and Angular?
If I am not mistaken, Pusher and PubNub, are providing this necessary open connection with the server using websockets, so when the server has something to share, angular will now and render it.
Since I would like to use Laravel and MySQL as a persistence layer, I am not sure, what the best way would be. I am not even sure, if I understood everything correctly, which I wrote above, since I am new to angular and real-time applications.
What would be the next necessary steps, to get some Real-Time capability into a PHP/MySQL application?
The solution for your problem is:
1º - open websocket connection with the websocket-server and subscribe a channel, after this send the data to your serve using ajax
tutorial angular pusher
2º - In server side, you get the data, saves to your database and send a 'PUBLISH' to the respective channel into websocket server
lib useful for this
3º - Through the subscribe gets the data in real time
Pusher.subscribe('channel', 'event', function (item) {
// code
});
I had a similar problem recently and I finally ended up using Redis publish/subscribe Redis. You can store data in the channel and then subscribe to any changes. When something changes you can send it to Pusher which will send it then to the clients.
I also recommend considering Node.js and Socket.io since you can achieve very good performance without third party service, and even if you don't have experience with node you can find very good examples on Socket.IO how to write an application.
For Redis there is a good library for PHP called Predis and there is Redis Node client as well, so you can mix it all together.