TypeScript license [closed] - licensing

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been all over the http://www.typescriptlang.org/ site and cannot find current information about the license for TypeScript. We would like to start exploring TypeScript as a replacement for JavaScript in our organization, but are unclear on the terms of use. The old codeplex site indicated it was licensed under Apache Version 2.0, but I can't find anything recent. Does anyone have pointers to the latest terms?
Existing questions on the topic seem to be regarding the preview version of TypeScript.
Thanks!
Paul

The authorative source tells that the current version is Apache licensed as well: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

Related

Cakephp Current Stable version [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have some experience with CakePhp 1.3 , i did one project in 1.3 platform. After that there are new versions of CakePhp are released. now i am confused about developing in which version.. if anybody can assist me about choosing the version. ?
The latest version, usually. It does mean you’ll have to read the manual on differences between 1.x and 2.x, new features etc.
There are lots of changes in cakephp version 2. I suggest you to start learning 2nd version from documentation http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/index.html .Once you learn basics of new version you can start with it developing

Is there any specific license should be used for Google Drive SDK? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it compatible with Apache License Version 2.0?
Though it have samples used Apache license, couldn't find any documentation of sdk which officially mentioned about the license.
Thanks.
The Java SDK code is hosted at http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/
It is stated there as Apache 2.0
I think it is "Apache License, Version 2.0" only.
Read the terms for the same : https://developers.google.com/terms/

Neo4j license in Open Source framework [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I planned to write a small neo4j wrapper in my own framework, which is OS under the Apache 2 license. Is it a problem to publish my code for neo4j under the Apache2 license since neo4j uses the GPL/AGPL license?
Thanks a lot!
you can publish the code under Apache License, however the runtime would be under GPL. Got any details?

Carrot2 license for commercial project without website&documentation [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
According to carrot2 FAQ we should acknowledge project users about using Carrot2.
Can I use Carrot2 in a commercial project? Yes. The only requirement
is that you properly acknowledge the use of Carrot2 (on the project's
website and documentation) and let us know about your project. Please
also remember to read the license.
But we don't have and site or documentation because we are building closed project.
How can we integrate carrot2 in these circumstances?
I've revised the text on the license and FAQ pages to make the acknowledgment optional, but you still need to include Carrot2 license file in your binary distribution. A common practice is to put the license file next to the relevant JAR file.

Wurfl license in a commercial product [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I noticed that WURFL changed his license model on 30 august 2010. Can please anyone explain me, can I use it with new license in commercial product?
See licensing info for commercial use at ScientaMobile
A cloud offering should be making it's debut in roughly a month, and may save you some $ depending on your usage. A free version with limited capabilities will likely be included as well.

Resources