Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
According to carrot2 FAQ we should acknowledge project users about using Carrot2.
Can I use Carrot2 in a commercial project? Yes. The only requirement
is that you properly acknowledge the use of Carrot2 (on the project's
website and documentation) and let us know about your project. Please
also remember to read the license.
But we don't have and site or documentation because we are building closed project.
How can we integrate carrot2 in these circumstances?
I've revised the text on the license and FAQ pages to make the acknowledgment optional, but you still need to include Carrot2 license file in your binary distribution. A common practice is to put the license file next to the relevant JAR file.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I ordered a FirefoxOS smartphone yesterday and inspected the Firefox marketplace for apps.
I was wondering where i can find the licenses for each APP.
Is there a standard license (MIT, BSD, GPL)?
I also searched the MDN but i found no information about licensing models.
Neither open, nor closed source.
For example at F-Droid (which i used in past for Android) solitaire the license is Apache2.
The solitaire at firefox' marketplace has which license?
Only "Open Web Apps" are mentioned here but nothing in detail about licensing.
Does anyone knows about?
I asked this in the SUMO forums at mozilla.org and got my answer:
It appears that this feature is not available. To find the licensing
type of specific applications, you should contact the developer
directly.
This tracking bug has more information, including discussions on this
feature:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805073
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been all over the http://www.typescriptlang.org/ site and cannot find current information about the license for TypeScript. We would like to start exploring TypeScript as a replacement for JavaScript in our organization, but are unclear on the terms of use. The old codeplex site indicated it was licensed under Apache Version 2.0, but I can't find anything recent. Does anyone have pointers to the latest terms?
Existing questions on the topic seem to be regarding the preview version of TypeScript.
Thanks!
Paul
The authorative source tells that the current version is Apache licensed as well: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it compatible with Apache License Version 2.0?
Though it have samples used Apache license, couldn't find any documentation of sdk which officially mentioned about the license.
Thanks.
The Java SDK code is hosted at http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/
It is stated there as Apache 2.0
I think it is "Apache License, Version 2.0" only.
Read the terms for the same : https://developers.google.com/terms/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking to package and deploy a portable version of any popular web browser with my application, do you know any web browser that has a license that permit's to distribute it with a commerical application?
There is not much choice nowadays, so you can do your own research and read licenses for currently used browsers.
If you don't want to pay any license fees, you should take a look on Mozilla's Firefox licensing: http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/licensing.html
In general, yes, you can redistribute Firefox, under certain conditions. Also see Licencing FAQ: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/mpl-faq.html
Or, take a look on Chromium licensing: http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/chromium/terms.html
Also, you might want to embed browser's engine in your application (For Mozilla's Gecko read: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/embedding/ , for WebKit, consult your UI widget library, it might have it already; if not, take a look here: http://trac.webkit.org/wiki)
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
This is more of a licencing issue than a code question. I really like the ckeditor editor and would like to use it in my freelance projects which I do for clients. However upon reading the license page it has me in a bit of a confusion. DO I have to buy licences if I intend to use this in cms websites that I build myself and hand over to clients?
If so then what are my alternate options which don't cost anything?
Its should be ok, if you don't change anything of its source, IMHO.
Integrating CKEditor in commercial
software, taking care of satisfying
the Open Source licenses terms, while
not able or interested on supporting
CKEditor and its development.
I am not a lawyer, but the dual licensing model would appear to not prevent you from using the open source licensed CKEditor in your cms / client projects, as long as the terms of the chosen license are met.
What you cannot do is sell, give away or otherwise distribute the editor to third parties without providing them with access to the source code and the license attached to the product.