Is there any specific license should be used for Google Drive SDK? [closed] - licensing

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it compatible with Apache License Version 2.0?
Though it have samples used Apache license, couldn't find any documentation of sdk which officially mentioned about the license.
Thanks.

The Java SDK code is hosted at http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/
It is stated there as Apache 2.0

I think it is "Apache License, Version 2.0" only.
Read the terms for the same : https://developers.google.com/terms/

Related

TypeScript license [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been all over the http://www.typescriptlang.org/ site and cannot find current information about the license for TypeScript. We would like to start exploring TypeScript as a replacement for JavaScript in our organization, but are unclear on the terms of use. The old codeplex site indicated it was licensed under Apache Version 2.0, but I can't find anything recent. Does anyone have pointers to the latest terms?
Existing questions on the topic seem to be regarding the preview version of TypeScript.
Thanks!
Paul
The authorative source tells that the current version is Apache licensed as well: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

implications of eclipse public license (EPL 1.0) when using WSO2 [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
WSO2 stack is built on top of eclipse equinox which is licensed under the eclipse public license (EPL 1.0).
If I build proprietary components that will only deploy in the WSO2 stack, what are the implications of the EPL for me? Do I need to provide anything with my binaries, for example attribution notices?
WSO2 code is under Apache 2.0 licence, and as stated here [1] Apache 2.0 is compatible with EPL so i do not believe this will be of any issue when working with WSO2 stack
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#3RDPARTY
To add to Pulasthi's answer - while EPL is compatible with Apache license, changes to EPL-licensed code need to be contributed back. Apart from that, EPL is commercial friendly. So unless you do modifications to the Equinox code, there won't be problems building commercial software using it.

Neo4j license in Open Source framework [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I planned to write a small neo4j wrapper in my own framework, which is OS under the Apache 2 license. Is it a problem to publish my code for neo4j under the Apache2 license since neo4j uses the GPL/AGPL license?
Thanks a lot!
you can publish the code under Apache License, however the runtime would be under GPL. Got any details?

Carrot2 license for commercial project without website&documentation [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
According to carrot2 FAQ we should acknowledge project users about using Carrot2.
Can I use Carrot2 in a commercial project? Yes. The only requirement
is that you properly acknowledge the use of Carrot2 (on the project's
website and documentation) and let us know about your project. Please
also remember to read the license.
But we don't have and site or documentation because we are building closed project.
How can we integrate carrot2 in these circumstances?
I've revised the text on the license and FAQ pages to make the acknowledgment optional, but you still need to include Carrot2 license file in your binary distribution. A common practice is to put the license file next to the relevant JAR file.

JRE Redistributable License [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is JRE (standard edition) freely redistributable with our commercial application?
Is yes, what license text / note should I look into. Any pointers will greatly appreciated.
If you download the JRE from Oracle, you should receive a license, where this all is explained in great detail.

Resources