Angular Naming Convention - angularjs

I'm currently learning Angular|AngularJS|Angular.js. I'm curious, is there an official name for this AWESOME framework? If so, what is it?
I see AngularJS used a lot with 'Angular' being the brevity option. However, I personally prefer Angular.js because I see projections like Angular.dart highlighting one of Angular's strong points.
In my mind, I view it as
Angular - The name of the framework (like .NET)
.[Language]
My opinions aside, I'm trying to learn if there's an 'official' name. Is it AngularJS or Angular.js?
Thank you!

According to Wikipedia it's AngularJS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AngularJS

Related

What is the best version of ngTagsInput for Angular not AngularJs

I found the ngTagsInput framework
https://mbenford.github.io/ngTagsInput/
a very feature-rich library. But for Angular 8 users I found the ngx-chips framework
https://www.npmjs.com/package/ngx-chips
It appears to work, but appears to be missing some obvious features, or it the features are achievable they appear to be difficult to implement. For example: providing chips of different colors.
Questions:
1) Is ngx-chips the most capable replacement for ngTagsInput for the Angular 2+? is there something better?
2) I understand it's not recommended to use a angularjs library inside of Angular 2+? So using the ngTagsInput library can be used?
ngx-chips was the best opensource framework I found at this time. Documentation is a bit terse, but the software is self appears solid.

Is zurb-foundation compatible with Angular JS?

I need to migrate an site from one framework to another because I need to use Angular JS.
I found zurb-foundation very interesting. It happens that it seems to use jQuery.
According to this website https://scotch.io/tutorials/how-to-correctly-use-bootstrapjs-and-angularjs-together
When building out Angular projects, you should not add on the full jQuery library. jQlite is already included in Angular and this should be all the jQuery that is necessary.
I had a bad experience running Bootstrap and Angular together and I don't want to repeat the same mistake.
It happens that I found the following line at zurb-foundation index.html
<script src="js/vendor/jquery.js"></script>
A quick search has shown that it seems to be a "simplified" version of jQuery (am I wrong?).
I've seem many people questioning things related to Angular in Foundation apps.
My question is: Is Angular compatible with Foundation?
While you'll read in many places that you should stay away from jQuery when using Angular, you'll also notice a subtle "at first" here and there. Angular is quite opinionated, and employs a declarative way of doing things, whereas jQuery is imperative. Check this out for more on the topic.
To answer your question:
Scotch.io's tutorial about Angular and Bootstrap involves UI Bootstrap, a library of directives written in Angular to be able to integrate common Bootstrap functionalities easier.
The equivalent of UI Bootstrap for Foundation is Angular Foundation. I recommend giving this thread a look-over as well, as it contains information that may be relevant to your use case.
So yes, Angular is compatible with Foundation. Happy hacking :)
a quick answer is of course they are compitable with each other. check this out from Zurb. However if you do not want to use JQuery, then the easiest way is to use pineconellc for foundation 5. foundation 6 does not have a port yet as far as I know.

Can angular and knockout be used in same web application?

I am learning Angular JS and Knockout JS. So usually during interviews I have encountered a question like,
Can we use both Angular JS and Knockout JS in the same application at a time.
Also what could be the disadvantages and advantages if we do that?
If we cannot use both frameworks in the same web application, what are the reasons.
Please help me out.
Yes you can ("But why would you? AngularJS already has data binding" would be my counter question)
Disadvantages
Devs must learn two frameworks.
As mentioned above, increased loading time.
Advantages
None that I can see.
See 1.

AngularJS-based UI Components, quantumui vs. angular-strap vs. angular-bootstrap-ui

I have been looking for a component set for a start-up project which would be based on AngularJS.
After some research, I have found three common component sets which can be applicable.
The first is AngularJS Bootstrap UI. It seems clear, but there are no enough examples and documentation.
The second is angular-strap. I have seen that it is a simple implementation of bootstrap.js with some additional features, but it seem very simple.
And the last one is QuantumUI. I have seen that it is amazing, but it seems very new.
What is the experience with these frameworks? Can you list pros cons for them?
I am owner of QuantumUI and is is not truth to say anything about other's projects.
However I can say that in short;
ui-bootstrap: is pure angular based, but it is old and not compatiable with new angular versions. Also it's plugins are very simple.
Also angular-strap is a implementation of bootstrap.js. Namely, it isn't a project of angular thinking.
However QuantumUI is a compact angular solution. It's components are powerful, server and developer friendly and also there is no Jquery dependency. All components are results of angular thinking.

backbonejs + angularjs integration

do you have any experience with integrating AngularJS component into existing BackboneJS application?
Could you just briefly give me some help, what should I do to make it work?
Thank you
Igor
I was able to make it work after all
for the future reference - this gist helped me a lot: https://gist.github.com/dgs700/6197687
anyway, Charles is right - it is definitely not nice to combine these two frameworks (in my case, it was not my call to do so...)
Angular scope will overcome the backbone scope. There is no point using those two frameworks on the same project. Mixing those two will result in a poor designed project.
Either stick to Backbone or replace it with Angular.

Resources