The problem is that when I redeclare standard SqlDataTable to my CustomSqlDataTable inside SqlDataSet. It works until you change the SqlDataSet that contain your custrom dataTable. After any change in SqlDataset it recreate code of own definition and all dataTables again becomes standard SqlDataTable. How to avoid it?
Thanks!
The MyTalbeDataTable class (inherits Devart.Data.SqlServer.SqlDataTable), which is a part of a Devart typed DataSet, is generated with a "partial" keyword. Therefore, you can create a separate MyClass.cs file and extend a "predefined" functionality of MyTalbeDataTable. The code within MyClass.cs will not be wiped out because this is a custom file.
Related
I am new to decision table so please forgive me if I asked a very basic question. I am working on an angular web app that uses decision table.
Could we change the table header 'Output' to something else?
Unfortunately, I cannot find any such label neither in the HTML nor in the controller.
For future reference:
It cannot be done through CSS. therefore following is my solution.
Inspect the code that either the dmn table is using modeling module or some other bpmn table features. In my case, it is using modeling. I override the following module by inheriting from it, to make the Input header cell dynamic and output fixed or change the label as well.
https://github.com/bpmn-io/dmn-js/blob/31803afe1bdccdc350da73293a75e2cbf3f14932/lib/table/features/modeling/Modeling.js
Ok I found this wonderful idea on code project.
link
The idea is great add all your data templates to collection in your list box. Tell each one what to look for (a type) and what data template to use when it runs into that type. The problem is that the included source code is different from the on page code and I can't seen to get any combination of it to work. Even adding the missing quotation marks and changing the type to a local class instead of the non-accessible string and int32 classes.
So the question is. What am I doing wrong?
Bryan
Should be totally redundant when you have DataTemplate.DataType.
(Example)
I am trying to rename the class name for a view controller (which has an associated .xib file) via XCode's refactoring tool. After entering a new name, I get this error message (no preview of changes):
The selection is not a type that can be renamed.
Make a different selection and try again.
I have tried all the suggestions in this SO thread, but no luck.
What could prevent XCode from being able to refactor a class (and related file names), when other classes and variables can be refactored without any problem?
I think you tried to change the classname by selecting the file and press refactor or you select it in the #import "classname".
Instead try to select "classname" in the interface definition after #interface
I also met this problem
Here is my solution
Move the whole Project to another place Then it works(to me)
I'm using EXTJS 4.1 and I'm naming my components as follows. If I create a store I end it with Store and I do the same for Controllers, Models, etc. So I may have UserStore.js. I then put it in a controller. Now EXTJS will create getter and setters for it but the way it does it, is they append the name "Store" to the end so I now have the following: getUserStoreStore(). Which I don't like.
But I want to append Store to my file names so I know what files I'm working in. So for example I may have a UserModel.js, UserStore.js, UserView.js, UserController.js. If I didn't I would have 4 files Called User.js and it would be a pain to always have to remember which file I'm working in.
So my question is there a config to change the way EXTJS names these getters and setters, or do I have to live with getUserStoreStore. It gets even uglier is I have sub dir under stores so for example if I have the following:
-store
-user
-UserStore.js
-UserPersmission.js
I define the store like this:
Ext.define('MyApp.store.user.UserStore'
I then get the following setter:
getUserUserStoreStore()
Yuck! Any idea or do I just live with this?
The short answer is No
You can only change it by overriding the method that creates the 'getter', cause there is no config. Other than, f.e. .Net ExtJS uses namespaces to identify the type (f.e. the controller namespace) and not a applied suffix. In addition; other suffixes are applied by the array into which the class has been placed (f.e. store, model, view).
I recommend you to just divide by namespaces.
I have an user-defined control which includes a property ElementList of IList<WFParament> type. When I add my control into a form, I get the error:
"WorkFlowDesign.WFParament[]" can't be transfered into "WorkFlowDesign.WFParament[]"
Does your usercontrol do anything on load? If so, try wrapping it in:
if(!DesignMode)
{
//Do something
}
I would verify that you don't have two versions of the assembly containing the type WorkFowDesign.WFParament loaded/referenced. This could happen if your project where you are using the user control references one version of the assembly while the user defined control is compiled against a different version. If this is the case you will need to update one of the two so that they are referencing the same version of the assembly containing WorkflowDesign.WFParament.