C project with two examples, only one seems to compile, makefile issue - c

I'm working on an open source C project that has two example files to run the library, one called example.c, and one called test.c.
The Makefile consists of the following:
test: test.c src/term.c
$(CC) $^ -o $#
example: example.c src/term.c
$(CC) -std=c99 $^ -o $#
.PHONY: test example
However, when I run make and then do ./test, test runs, but when I do ./example, it doesn't. Any ideas why?

When you just type make the first target is being executed, in your case its test. So you will get only test executable. But if you type make example then example target is executed and you will get example binary. I think you need fresh up with Makefile rules.You can refer this for basic concepts or this for in depth understanding

Related

make command runs only the first row in Makefile

Hi I Have this makefile:
main.o:main.c functionsLab1.c functionsLab1.h
gcc -c main.c
functionsLab1.o: functionsLab1.c functionsLab1.h
gcc-c functionsLab1.c
now when i Run the command "make" it only executes the first command in makefile.
how can I Run all the commands at once?
Thanks in advance :)
I Tried to type "make all" command and it showed an error.
make is able to build what you need, but only if you tell it the right dependencies. In particular, your current Makefile is lying about dependencies, since main.o does not at all depend on functionsLab1.c. Rather, the final executable you are trying to build depends on functionsLab1.o. You can probably make your entire Makefile:
main: main.o functionsLab1.o
(Yes, literally one line.). That ignores the dependency on the header file, but it should work for you. Let make use its default rules; they are pretty good. If you want to include the header dependency, do something like:
main: main.o functionsLab1.o
main.o: main.c functionsLab1.h
functionsLab1.o: functionsLab1.c functionsLab1.h
If for some reason you really want to be explicit (you don't!), you can do:
main: main.o functionsLab1.o
$(CC) -o $# $? # Warning: incomplete. See note below
main.o: main.c functionsLab1.h
functionsLab1.o: functionsLab1.c functionsLab1.h
Again, letting make use its default rules to construct the object files. You can override the default rules, but there is very seldom a reason to do so. Indeed, this is an excellent example where attempting to override the default rule gives you a sub-optimal recipe. The default rule would be something like $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $# $? $(LOADLIBES) $(LDLIBS), and many users would reasonably expect to be able to specify LDLIBS. The example shown above ignores LDLIBS, violating the principal of least surprise.

Makefiles in C language

Hello I'm having a hard time understanding makefiles. I play with them to understand them better but here's the issue:
all: main
main: main.o funcIO.o funcMan.o
$(CC) -o $# $^
----------------------------------
funcIO.o: funcIO.c
$(CC) -c -o funcIO.o funcIO.c
funcMan.o: funcMan.o
$(CC) -c -o funcMan.o funcMan.c
This works regardless if everything below the punctured line is there or not. I'm told that this is the right way to write makefiles but why does it work without the targets funcIO.o and funcMan.o and if it works without them, why do we write them? Can you explain it like I'm 5 years old?
Thanks for your time!
Assuming you're using GNU Make (it might be the same for other Makes), this works due to built-in rules. Make already knows how to compile a C source file, and unless you tell it otherwise, it applies this recipe to it:
%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) -c -o $# $<
$# is the target of the rule (the filename of the .o file) and $< is the first prerequisite (the filename of the .c file). The other variables have sensible defaults (mostly empty).
The right way to use Makefiles is to keep them as small as possible. Makefiles are about determining dependencies and only incidentally can be used to build programs. Here's how I would rewrite your Makefile:
all: main
main: main.o funcIO.o funcMan.o
And I only put the all target there because you had it to begin with. Make has a list of builtin rules that know how to build things given certain files as inputs. If you ask it for a .o file, it will look for a file of the same name, but with the extension of .c, .cpp, .f77, etc., and run the rule that builds what you asked for using that prerequisite file. You don't even need to specify how to build those, they come for free! It's the more complex relationships (such as a final binary) that need to be spelled out, as shown in my above example. There's a similar rule for building a binary out of .o files (assuming one of them has the same name as the binary, which yours does), so you don't need to specify any tasks, just the dependencies. You can control how they are run by adjusting special flags:
CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic
main: main.o funcIO.c funcMan.o
main: LDLIBS += -lm
This version builds every C-compiled file with those CFLAGS, and builds main while linking in the -lm math library.
If you are building normal C programs, I strongly recommend this approach. Specify the prerequisites of the final binary, and control builds through these Make variables.

Why is my very simple makefile not working

When I say very simple I mean it. I have a main.c and a header file called input_error.h.
main.o : main.c input_error.h
gcc -c main.c
When I run the command "make" gcc -c main.c is executed but it's not updating any changes I make to my main.c file. When I manually type in "gcc main.c" it works fine.
EDIT: It seems like I need to add another rule but I'm not sure what that entails
At the moment your makefile only builds the .o file. You can build your binary in 2 ways. Note that make requires the indentation in the targets statements to be a tab and not 4 spaces, as it may have been converted to by the browser.
build .o separately then link binary. Note that using the -c switch causes gcc to build only the object file.
main: main.o
gcc main.o -o main
main.o : main.c input_error.h
gcc -c main.c -o main.o
build in one step
main: main.c input_error.h
gcc main.c -o main
You can also avoid repetition in your makefile by using special variables to denote the target ($#), the first dependency ($<) and all (#^) the dependencies.
e.g. one of the above lines could become
main.o : main.c input_error.h
gcc -c $< -o $#
Which seems a bit cryptic at first but you get used it. The implicit rules in #kaylums answer will also help to cut down on typing.
The Makefile you have only has a single rule to compile the .o file. That is, it does not have any rule to link the final executable.
make has implicit rules for building many common targets. So your Makefile could be as simple as the following:
all: main
main.o : input_error.h
For further explanation:
all: main: Since this is the first target it is the one that will be built by default if no explicit target is provided to the make command line. It depends on a single target main.
There is no explicit rule for main but make has an implicit rule which will build it from main.c.
main.o : input_error.h: Tells make that main.o needs to be rebuilt if input_error.h changes. There is no need to put main.c here as make has that implicit knowledge. There is also no need for an explicit command as make also has that implicit.

Makefile dependency being ignored

I created a simple makefile to understand the basic idea behind how they work and it's not performing the way I expected. Please see the following:
test: test.c
gcc -o test test.c
My understanding is this should only run when there have been changes to the test.c file. The problem is it runs every time regardless of whether or not there were changes.
I've noticed that this occurs when I use arbitrary target names. If I make the target name an actual file name such as "test.exe", it works correctly, but all the tutorials I've seen show dependencies working with arbitrary target names. Any idea as to why this is occurring?
Under Windows, Make automatically adds the suffix .exe to the generated program.
Since the name of the target is different from the result of the rule, Make tries to generate it again.
You should write your makefile like this:
EXE := test.exe
$(EXE): test.c
gcc -o $# $^
If you need portability and don't want to rewrite the rule, use this:
EXE := test
if ($(OS),Windows_NT)
EXE := $(EXE).exe
endif
$(EXE): test.c
gcc -o $# $^

Using the make command without makefiles?

I was compiling some C code for an assignment and I ran "make codeFile", where "codeFile" was the name of my C program, and even though I didn't have a makefile, an executable was created, and it ran and worked correctly.
Does anyone know why this worked? Why does make compile something even if I don't have a makefile? The only reference I could find was this:
http://daly.axiom-developer.org/TimothyDaly_files/class5/node5.html
Make has an internal database with implicit rules. You can use make -p to list them. Also make -d will tell you which rules are being applied, so that would help you discover which implicit rules are being used in this case.
Make has several pre-defined implicit rules. In particular, in your case, it uses two such rules when trying to determine what to do for the target codeFile:
%: %.o # Link object file
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) n.o $(LOADLIBES) $(LDLIBS)
%.o: %.c # Compile C source code
$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -c
Using the make command without makefiles?
make has implicit rules that work as defaults unless you override them.
According to the make man page:
make -p -f/dev/null
will list all of the implicit rules (and relevant environment variables) without attempting to actually remake files.
To demonstrate the usage, I ran make in Cygwin, which gave me an exe file. Note no .c on the name passed to make:
$ ls
hello.c
$ make hello
cc hello.c -o hello
$ ls
hello.c hello.exe
I also ran this in Ubuntu Linux, and my result was nearly the same as above, but the .exe extension was not there, instead I had the plain hello executable:
$ ls
hello.c hello
Step by step derivation
I believe the relevant pieces of the make implicit rules are as follows:
CC = cc
cc is aliased to CC
LINK.c = $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH)
a LINK format is created, where the flags will be empty, and the TARGET_ARCH variable is also empty (to allow users to set values for various target architectures.) Then we have:
%: %.c
# recipe to execute (built-in):
$(LINK.c) $^ $(LOADLIBES) $(LDLIBS) -o $#
The ^ variable is the prerequisite, hello.c. The other variables are empty. These are followed by the -o flag and the target name. The empty variables explain the extra spaces in the command make ran:
cc hello.c -o hello
And the %: %.c matched the target given to make with the filename of the same target name ending in .c, which caused the recipe to execute.

Resources