I have created a pass id in the provisioning profile, generated the certificate and private key, and our server code can generate passes. However I cannot figure out how to make the project entitlements work with passkit. How do you associate a pass id with your app id or bundle id or something? XCode shows the option "Use pass type identifiers from the provisioning profile". Yet it doesn't appear to be anything in the portal to connect a profile with a pass id.
I can run things in debug on my local device, but how without the entitlements I can't distribute this to anyone.
Clearly I am missing some magic and all the docs talk about is building passes and using them, but nothing about building entitlements. Any ideas?
Apparently the answer is, nothing. The Xcode user interface is confusing but apparently you don't have to do anything to support any pass id that your organization created. Passes are unique to your developer account, not any specific of your apps.
For once I wish Apple would actually document new features in the XCode UI.
Related
We've created an application using SCIM 2 SDK from PingIdentity for provisioning with Azure AD. Custom mapping is set up and working.
However, when the user is CREATED, all of the fields are included in the import, but only a few fields are included in the provisioning step and sent to our application. Provisioning needs to run a second time on that user to UPDATE in order for all the fields to be included. Amongst other things, this means that first and last name are not split and it only sends the displayname (which ends up as firstname on our end).
For some users in normal provisioning, it can take days between the create and update runs so we're missing data for a long time.
Anyone know how can we can test for what's causing this and solve it so all the fields are included in the initial CREATE run for a user?
Here are the attribute mapping settings: https://imgur.com/ypfAAmD
And an example log of when the user is created with only basic fields: https://imgur.com/iOXACJh
vs. when the user is updated with all the other fields: https://imgur.com/UqDNyCv
I'm a product manager at Microsoft that works on the provisioning service and our SCIM client.
The behavior you're seeing occurs when you have attributes that are not part of the SCIM core schema included as "short" names. Attributes not defined in the SCIM core schema (RFC 7643) should have full URN syntax. Something to the effect of urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:extension:appName:2.0:User:attributeName is commonly used by other implementations. The shaky behavior you're seeing where the AAD provisioning service fails to send these attribute values via a POST but later includes them in a PATCH comes down to different code paths in the AAD provisioning service, and the PATCH code happens to handle this differently than the POST code. This is purely by chance, however, and isn't an intentional design choice. At some future point I'm hoping we'll make this more consistent and disallow incorrectly structured attribute names entirely.
If you adjust your attribute names to align with the guidance in the SCIM spec's schema RFC and provide the attributes with fully defined URNs, you should see consistent behavior that works on both POST and PATCH.
I'm trying to use react-facebook-login to authenticate users, but I need to access the user's email. This should be doable via the scope parameter, but it doesn't work. There are multiple issues about this subject on Github going back years that haven't been addressed.
My question is - is there a way to modify/override this package to accommodate this (it appears the scope parameter is simply not added to the popup url), since it looks good otherwise? I have no idea how to patch or override node modules.
Alternatively, what is the absolute easiest way to implement this - is getting dirty with the Javascript SDK the only way, or are there better packages?
<FacebookLogin
appId="myappid"
autoLoad={true}
onClick={componentClicked}
callback={responseFacebook}
scope="public_profile,name,email"
/>
The Package has no issue your app does, you need permission to access such information, while in development you can get the the information's just fine but be aware in a recent change in facebook graph api now in order to access user email you must ask for email Advanced Access you can do that by going to your app dashboard
https://developers.facebook.com/apps/appId
in the left panel click App Review and select Permission And Futures there search for email and click Get Advanced Access Clear your browser cache and you good to go
I'm using this package instead which works as intended:
https://github.com/seeden/react-facebook
Picked up an existing project built on Composite C1 version 4.3, and I'm trying to install a package. All the information online says to go to System -> Packages -> Install Local Package, but I don't even see a Packages option on the System page at all.
I've tried to see if this option was disabled or not available in this version, but nothing definitive so far.
EDIT:
I do have direct access to code, so if there's a config file I could edit it directly, but haven't found anything that indicates where this might be.
It looks like the account that you are logging in with isn't the main admin account. It's probably a developer account to which the admin has added the ability to make backups and tweak Google Analytics settings. You'll need to contact the admin and ask them to give you full privileges, in order to install packages yourself.
If you have FTP access to the website, there is a way to move an account from one group to another:
Open: ~/App_Data/Composite/DataStores/Composite.Data.Types.IUser.xml
Find the user account for the user you want to change group membership for, and make a note of the Id GUID value.
Open: ~/App_Data/Composite/DataStores/Composite.Data.Types.IUserGroup.xml
Find the group you want that account to have membership of (ie: Administrator or Admin), and make a note of the Id GUID value.
Open: ~/App_Data/Composite/DataStores/Composite.Data.Types.IUserUserGroupRelation.xml
Make a backup copy of this file, just in case it doesn't work!
In the origional, find UserId GUID matching your account Id, then ammend the UserGroupId to the group Id. Save the file.
I've tried this out on my local copy of C1 and it appears to work. You should now have access to everything the admin has access to.
i downloaded the old version of C1 4.3 from github and started a new site, and looks like something is wrong with your site, because this version have package manager.
Something error on Log's Folder? (no Console Log item found in your capture)
I tested on this version (see the image uploaded), so, wich especific version have you?
The two files I needed to change were IUserActivePerspective, and IUserGroupActivePerspective. The perspectives for what I was missing were removed from the admin account, so I just needed to add them back there.
When creating a new project from the Google Developers Console, it asks for a project name. If an id equivalent to that project name is available, it makes the id to be the same as the project name. If not, some unique id is system generated.
When an id is not available, is there a way to determine who owns the id? There's an id I would like to use, and I'm not sure who is using it (or whether I mistakenly used it in a different GAE project).
If you created the id (and you didn't delete it) you should see it in the Developers Console. If you deleted it you can't re-use it anymore:
Accept the generated project ID or supply your own ID. This project ID
is used as the App Engine application ID. Note that this ID can only
be used once: if you subsequently delete your project, you won't be
able to re-use the ID in a new project.
No there is no way to know this. You can visit the appspot version of the website (appid.appspot.com) and maybe gather something from there, but there is no way to know who is using it.
I am currently working on a project whereby I have to make both openERP and SugarCRM talk to each other.
For example, if I add a new Account in SugarCRM, this account is also created in OpenERP...and if I create a new Customer in OpenERP, a new customer with same values is created in SugarCRM.
I've searched the net and I found a connector which allows this interfacing.
http://www.sugarforge.org/projects/sugar2openerp
This connector is not an easy thing to work with...I had to build a module inside SugarCRM for me to input connection details (url, username, password, etc ).
Now, I dont know how to proceed with the connector...the files contained in it mentioned "accounts_cstm"... should I create it or no?
Have you looked at the import_sugarcrm module (http://apps.openerp.com/addon/6970)?
I've never used it, but it is an certified OpenERP module, which means that it is officially supported by OpenERP SA, so you should be able to get support and post feature requests if necessary.
all table names ended with "_cstm" are the upgrade safe portion of the data you create in SugarCRM (_cstm for "custom"). For example if you add a new field to accounts, the original structure doesn't change. SugarCRM creates your new field in this table, and relates to the original accounts table thru id_c field.
I didn't test the module you are mentioning here, but if well constructed there wouldn't be need of creating such table.