I know Windows Forms quite good but I'm new to WPF.
I'd like to create application similar to RSS reader - in main window every note will be displayed in Post-it like frame and all notes should be chained and scrollable up and down. I also want to include kind of fisheye view - single note will be displayed full size in the centre of the screen and will shrink and rotate on the edge.
I know custom control, transformation and databinding concepts but I'm not sure how to handle displaying and scrolling notes in the main window. The questions are:
what is the suggested way to arrange, display and scroll ordered chain of notes?
should single note discover own position on the screen or it should be notified by it's container?
how in such solution provide feature which will open related notes as a "multiple popups" notes connected by a line with original one? (like traversing correlated results in Google Wonder Wheel, adobe flash there)
are there any standard solutions for displaying and manipulating (moving, attaching, collapsing) such popup-widgets?
If there are any similarities in your proposal to other GUI frameworks (Forms, Swing, SWT), comparison are welcome too.
Thanks in advance!
It seems to me you are describing a "carousel control" or "element flow" or "cover flow". I've put some links at this answer.
Related
I have a video playing of lines being drawn on the screen. Is it possible to create a pixel shader (for WPF) that turns newly colored pixels a certain color for N milliseconds?
That way, there can be some indication to the user to movement on the screen when the lines don't move often and the user isn't always looking at the screen.
You can use DirectShow. Its written in unmanaged code, so you need to use this wrapper DirectShow.NET in order to use it in your C# application which is running in managed environment (samples are included, even with EVR which stands for Enhanced video Renderer which means MUCH better video quality). And when you will be passing a control handle to wrapper method for setting the video output, you need a WinForms control, because only from them you can get your desired control handle. That WinForms control you can then host in your WPF application using the WindowsFormsHost control provided for such situations when you need to use some WinForms control(s) in a WPF application. Its just theory, so i dont know if its an ultimate solution for you.
BTW: The whole idea is based on fact, that DirectShow is just some query constructed from separated filters. Renderer is a filter (EVR, VMR-7, VMR-9). Sound player is a filter. And they are connected through their pins. Its like a diagram. Electronic schema or something like that. And you can put for example Grey scale filter in there. And voila, video output will be greyscale. There is a bunch of tutorials for that. And completed simple filters as well. Unfortunately, filters must be written in C++:(
PS: I never said its gonna be easy:D
First time working on a GUI project.. and first time doing work on Windows so apologies in advance if this is a really noob question.
I'm taking baby steps into windows programming starting with vb.net WPF. Working in Visual Studio Express 2012.
I'm trying to work out how I can scale all the elements in a window with the window itself.
So for example, I'd create a window, say 1280x720, and place some images in the window. Say one at the top and one in the corner. (this is a basic media based application)
When I resize that window, I want the entire window to scale with it, so image 1 & 2 will get larger if the window gets larger, however this has to happen proportionally so that if I make the window a lot bigger in one direction one image can't overlap the other. Imagine the window is an image and I'm trying to resize it. (The overlap thing is the closest I've gotten to getting this working in my current attempts).
The layout in produciton will be more complex, comprising of mediaelements (video), images, text etc and all must scale accordingly.
This isn't something the user interacts with and so there are no form elements etc, and so I don't need form fields etc to stay the same size throughout scaling. I just need everything to scale like I'm scaling a picture. If for example I displayed this 1280x720 (16:9) layout on a 1920x1080 screen, maximised it should look identical only larger.
Hoping someone can point me in the right direction with this.
What I've tried so far- the few articles I did find on google relating to this (I may well be searching the wrong things) lead me to put all the elements in a viewbox, this lead to the overlap I mentioned earlier.
Ideas ?
I think you could use ViewBox container. The basic idea is as follows: ViewBox scales its content just as if it was an image scaled. This seems to be the closest result to what you've described in your question. Just put a Grid with absolutely-sized columns and rows into the ViewBox and set its Stretch to be Uniform:
<Viewbox Stretch="Uniform">
<Grid>
<..>Your controls, MediaElements, etc
<Grid>
</Viewbox>
You could also combine it (or entirely replace) with (e.g.) Grid Container : it gives you an ability to specify cell width and size usign star-syntax which is similair to html's percent syntax.
Another way is to use the DockPanel.
All-in-all there are plenty ways to achieve something similair and the way to go largely depends on the nuances of your particulair requirements.
Have a look at This tutorial to see a good overview of WPF containers and how to use them.
we want to make application like silverlight showcase Mapview
where we can search by different category on left hand side panel or people can select country or region on map. can anyone suggest some sample or guidelines to implement this?
Thanks
Given the complexity and obvious expense, I would be really impressed if anything like that was released as a sample (Microsoft are you listening?). It requires a lot of data to drive it.
I have been involved in creating a Xaml World map from scratch (below) and that alone took nearly a day for a stylised polygon version (no fine detail)....
Quoting myself: "You import a map as a background image and use the pen tool to dot-to-dot trace around the country. Combine all those path segments into a single path. Then create a separate poly-path for each state (close them to allow for a fill)."
Once you create them you can name the individual country polygons and connect up mouse logic to make them all glow on mouse over or change colour on press etc.
Basically all the other stuff on that screen are user controls and custom controls. Work out the behaviour you want and create controls to suit your own needs.
i want to display a table (like a footbal table) in silverlight in a windows phone 7 app. i was reading a bunch of articles on the www, but couldn't really understood what's the best way to approch this issue.
i am new to silverlight, so some code would be really awsome. I keep the data i have to display in some Lists (List), but i could change this...
any advices? thank you in advance!
naic
Due to the form factor [of almost all mobile devices] lists are much easier to read.
You will see this in the default templates for WP7.
There are various ways you can create a "table" in Silverlight. (I assume you are refering to a league table.) The easiest would probably be a grid or a templated list.
If you really must do this I would suggest having 2 different ways of displaying the data depending on screen orientation.
In the portrait orientation I would show a list with minimal statistics.
In the landscape orientation I would show a table layout which could include multiple statistics as there is more horizontal space.
I'm designing some dialog boxes, and I'm having a hard time to fit everything. (and it has to fit on a single dialog box by design, so please don't tell me I should make two dialogs instead of one:))
I'm wondering what's the max size a dialog can have before being annoying for the end user. Of course it should't be bigger than his resolution, but are there any other boundaries to consider?
I'm trying to limit at 800x580 (so that it can display fine on a 800x600 screen without hiding the taskbar), but I expect my users to be on 1024x768 or better screen resolutions.
Is a 800x580 dialog box ok, or is it too big?
Have you considered using a tabbed layout?
Also, I believe the smallest main-stream screen resolution is 1024x600.
I'd say anything over that is too big. I try to stick below 1000x500.
I'm writing this on a netbook (ASUS) with resolution 1024 x 600. I've also noticed this is a defacto standard for most other netbooks too.
Another option: you could create a dialog that resizes itself automatically to fill the current desktop (except for the task bar).
It could also enforce a "flow" style layout for it's child controls. This would ensure the best use of the available space is made.
To get "flowing" in Windows forms you can use either the flow layout control or (for a richer interface) the WebBrowser control.
By the way, modal dialogs seem to be less popular as a way of user interaction these days. Especially large dialogs containing a lot of information/controls. This article has some good alternatives.
I think that if the user NEEDS to see all data on screen at the same time... and you can fit everything in 800x580... I think that it's a fine size.
If you know all users have bigger resolutions so don't struggle... that size is OK.
However... a way of showing lots of information and being able to edit it... could be a PropertyGrid control (an example here)... may be that could shrink a bit the form if you don't feel confortable with it being so big. Don't know if it a possibility given the needs of your client/user.
Just hope that no-one ever tries using your app on a media center running through a standard definition display. That's 640x480 for NTSC. I've suffered this problem with quite a few apps.
Whatever your pixel by pixel size, if it takes more than a few seconds for skilled users to complete the use of your window, then it shouldn’t be a dialog. Anything longer is annoying. You’d be asking your users to do too much work that is too easy to lose (e.g., by hitting Cancel accidentally) and too hard to re-entered (e.g., between sessions). If you have so many controls that the dialog needs to be 800 by anything, then it’s too many controls. 200,000 square pixels and 40 controls is the very most you should consider for a dialog. And tabs are nature’s way of saying your dialog is too complex.
Dialogs are for entering parameters to execute a single command on one or more data objects visible in the primary window for the dialog, which is why dialogs need to be small and simple. I suspect that’s not what you’re doing. Instead, you’re using a “dialog” to represent the main data objects and carry out a major task, not a single command.
What you want is a primary window, not a dialog, with all the support necessary for the complicated task you’ve set up for the user. That includes providing a means for users to save, retrieve, and copy their work. That means a menu bar and toolbar with all the standard commands, including help. The window should absolutely be modeless, and be resizable, maximizable, and minimizable.
Primary windows should be designed to work best at the size of most (over half) of your users’ screens. 1024x768 is generally fine for today’s laptop/desktop screens, not that you should use that much space if you don’t have to. If the user’s screen is smaller, or the user for any reason resizes your window below the design size, then scrollbars should appear to allow full access to all controls and content in the form –just like any primary window. The experience on the web indicates that scrolling is not a showstopper for forms.
Beyond that, tabs may be used in a primary window to increase the number of controls on it. You said you don’t want to hear about multiple windows, but multiple windows should be used instead of tabs if the user will be comparing data across tabs/windows. You can also fit more in a given primary window size by using a compact presentation (I describe this at http://www.zuschlogin.com/?p=42), but test such an approach on your users before committing to it.