How can you relatively position elements in WPF?
The standard model is to use layout managers for everything, but what if you want to position elements (on a Canvas, for example) simply based on the position of other elements?
For example, you may want one element (say a button) to be attached the side of another (perhaps a panel) independent of the position or layout of that panel.
Anyone that's worked with engineering tools (SolidWorks, AutoCad, etc.) is familiar with this sort of relative positioning.
Forcing everything into layout managers (the different WPF Panels) does not make much sense for certain scenarios, where you don't care that elements are maintained by some parent container and you do not want the other children to be affected by a change in the layout/appearance of each other. Does WPF support this relative positioning model in any way?
Instead of putting (as in your example) a button directly on the canvas, you could put a stackpanel on the canvas, horizontally aligned, and put the two buttons in there.
Like so:
<Canvas>
<StackPanel Canvas.Left="100" Canvas.Top="100" Orientation="Horizontal">
<Button>Button 1</Button><Button>Button 2</Button>
</StackPanel>
</Canvas>
I think that it's quite flexible when you use more than 1 layout in a form, and you can create pretty much any configuration you want.
Good question. As far as I know, we need to have a different custom panel to get this feature. Since WPF is based on Visual Hierarchy there is no way to have this sort of Flat structure for the elements in the platform.
But Here is a trick to do this.
Place your elements in the same position and give relative displacement by using RenderTransform.TranslateTransform. This way your TranslateTransfrom's X and Y will always be relatuve to the other element.
Related
So there's this tutorial about creating a diagram in WPF.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/24681/WPF-Diagram-Designer-Part
I've read it, and still studying it to understand it completely.
At the end of this tutorial, you can basically add shapes, move/rotate/scale them, and since they are created in a vector form, they are keeping their resolutions, there are also connectors that can connect each shape with another.
My goal, since I need to create a simulator which shows how internet protocols are delivered, is to create a divided diagram in which Side A communicates with Side B. it could read an automata and simulate the transitions in the diagram.
I'm thinking of how to deliever this, and since I don't have a lot of knowledge in WPF, I wonder in which way should I implement it.
Should I create 2 different Canvases? or maybe dividing 1 canvas with two sides?
The main issue I'm dealing with, is that when a shape is being dragged to the end margin of the window, then the window allow me to slide it so I can see the rest of the field, this is being done by increasing the size of the Canvas, as seen in the Tutorial Part 1.
However, if my canvas is divided by two, and there's a border in the middle, how can I create two sliders for each of the sides?
I was wondering if you can give me any tips about how approaching this idea, since my knowledge in WPF is still very limited.
Here is my point of view, but it would be very useful if you would provide a more/less final sketch of your app. I recommend using Telerik AppMock but paint will also suffice ;).
From what I have understood you should need 3 canvases.
1-st is canvas on the left.
2-nd is canvas on the right.
3-rd is on top of both canvases.
When you want to drag an element, you must set opacity of the clicked element to be a bit transparent and leave it on its place(1st canvas), add copy of dragged element in to the 3rd canvas. When you do leftmousebuttonup(drop dragged item), you have to check where was it dropped and if it was droppend on the 2nd canvas you add it to this canvas. To position element on the canvas you can use Canvas.SetLeft and accordingly SetRight method.
You can put 1st and 2nd canvases into Grid. Even if Canvases will be bigger if Grid, view will be cut only to the size of the Grid.
Moreover, to allow canvases manipulation, add there (to the Grid) a scrollviewer which will Translate Transform the canvases given to their sizes.
Later, try to use MVVM pattern to fill your Canvases with data.
I would also suggest an ObservableColletion of drawable (you can use FrameworkElement as base class) and draggable objects. Different for every Canvas.
Good luck!
I was looking for a way to scale part of a wpf form properly when I came across this post on SO. It actually told me quickly and succinctly what I needed to know but got me to wondering on the following question.
I have identified a need for a control with a particular degree of functionality and as such it's a perfect candidate for a user control. One thing that it will need to be is scalable. If I were to enclose the contents of my user control in a viewbox (and there were several of those controls on a form in a wpf application) would they conflict with any viewbox that might be wrapping all of the controls on a form? In other words when designing user controls that require a degree of scalability is it acceptable to just 'wrap' the contents of the user control in a viewbox?
Thanks
The Viewbox will "stretch/scale a single child element to the fill the available space". You shouldn't run into any issues with Viewboxes at various nested levels composing a larger control (and it's fairly easy to test some general layouts in a mock project).
What is worth considering, is if the simple Viewbox scaling behaviour is actually what you're after. If you wanted say, a particular button to increase in size, or certain elements to stretch horizontally, you may get more mileage from various Grid layout options, with relative / proportional sizing/stretching.
Of course, the Viewbox scaling may be exactly what you're after =D
First time working on a GUI project.. and first time doing work on Windows so apologies in advance if this is a really noob question.
I'm taking baby steps into windows programming starting with vb.net WPF. Working in Visual Studio Express 2012.
I'm trying to work out how I can scale all the elements in a window with the window itself.
So for example, I'd create a window, say 1280x720, and place some images in the window. Say one at the top and one in the corner. (this is a basic media based application)
When I resize that window, I want the entire window to scale with it, so image 1 & 2 will get larger if the window gets larger, however this has to happen proportionally so that if I make the window a lot bigger in one direction one image can't overlap the other. Imagine the window is an image and I'm trying to resize it. (The overlap thing is the closest I've gotten to getting this working in my current attempts).
The layout in produciton will be more complex, comprising of mediaelements (video), images, text etc and all must scale accordingly.
This isn't something the user interacts with and so there are no form elements etc, and so I don't need form fields etc to stay the same size throughout scaling. I just need everything to scale like I'm scaling a picture. If for example I displayed this 1280x720 (16:9) layout on a 1920x1080 screen, maximised it should look identical only larger.
Hoping someone can point me in the right direction with this.
What I've tried so far- the few articles I did find on google relating to this (I may well be searching the wrong things) lead me to put all the elements in a viewbox, this lead to the overlap I mentioned earlier.
Ideas ?
I think you could use ViewBox container. The basic idea is as follows: ViewBox scales its content just as if it was an image scaled. This seems to be the closest result to what you've described in your question. Just put a Grid with absolutely-sized columns and rows into the ViewBox and set its Stretch to be Uniform:
<Viewbox Stretch="Uniform">
<Grid>
<..>Your controls, MediaElements, etc
<Grid>
</Viewbox>
You could also combine it (or entirely replace) with (e.g.) Grid Container : it gives you an ability to specify cell width and size usign star-syntax which is similair to html's percent syntax.
Another way is to use the DockPanel.
All-in-all there are plenty ways to achieve something similair and the way to go largely depends on the nuances of your particulair requirements.
Have a look at This tutorial to see a good overview of WPF containers and how to use them.
I have created a non standard shaped window with the
WindowStyle="None"
AllowsTransparency="True"
Background="Transparent"
approach.
I have arrived at the following:
A windows has a grid. The grid has an Image control (a superman logo) and a border control (blue panel) that will in turn contain listbox that is not yet visible due to the absense of elements.
At some point I need to fill an entire window with a patter, so I woul arrive at something like this:
If I just fill separate controls with a pattern, it wouldn't appear to be smoothly distributed along the page.
So my idea is to somehow dynamically get the path element out of the window and fill it with a pattern I need, and then display.
Can this be done via code at runtime?
A Path is probably the easiest way I know of, and is what I usually do for non-standard window shapes
I want to implement a rather complex CurveEditor that has to support the usual requirements like:
freely scalable and moveable axis
different interpolation types per curve point (Linear, Cubic, Spline)
Tangents (joined and broken)
Selecting one or several points to edit (move, scale, delete) via Fence or Click
Only show handles and highlights for selected curve points
I don't want to manipulate actual WPF curves but an existing model with key/value/tangents sets and sample the precise shape of the curve from our implementation.
I already gathered some experience on implementing custom UserControls and Templates. But I want to make sure, I don't miss any apparent solution. I planned to have this general XAML-tree:
CurveEditor - Window holding all content
MainThumb : Enable dragging and scaling the editor range
XAxis : UserControl rending some scale on the left side
YAxis : UserControl rending some scale on the bottom
Curves : Canvas holding the curves
Curve : UserControl for a single curve
CurveName - Label of the curve
CurveLine - DrawingVisual that will render the actual curve by sampling the internal implementation of the spline function.
CurveEditPoints - Canvas that holds all edit points
CurveEditPoint - UserControl for a single edit point
LeftTangent - UserControl for the left tangent handle
LeftTangentThumb - For modifying the handle
RightTangent - UserControl for the right tangent handle
RightTangentThumb - For modifying the handle
CurvePointCenter - Visualisation of the actual point, select state and interpolation type.
CurvePointThumb - Thumb to select and drag point around
I know, this is quite a complex question and I am not asking for an actual implementation. I am interested in the following questions:
Can you recommend any tutorials or books that might help me (I already got Illustrated WPF, WPF Control Development Unleashed, and a couple of other)
Should minor elements like the Tangents be individual UserControls?
What container is best suited for hosting the individual "Curves", "EditPoints" and "Tangents". Right now, I use Canvas and Canvas.SetLeft/SetTop to position the children, but that feels "strange".
Should I use "Shapes" like Path or DrawingVisual-Classes to implement actual representation. Path is straight forward, but I am concerned about performance with hundreds of CurvePoints.
Should I use Transforms to rotate the tangents or is just fine to do some triangulation math in the code behind files?
Does the structure roughly make sense, or do you suggest a completely different approach?
you seem to have the right tools at hand, WPF Unleashed is excellent, but I guess you have that one already.
make individual UserControls in one of these cases:
you are using the same xaml all over the place (DRY)
you xaml file gets too big (get some components out)
you need to inherit from some class
this depends on how much codebehind you want.
you can, as you suggested in your comment, use an ItemsControl as a container for wherever you need selection between multiple items. so this could also be done on the level of Curves, not just on the level of points on the curve. Depending on how you want to handle drawing of the actual lines and curves you can even have an ItemsControl for those. (on a side note: you will not have virtualization out of the box though, as your items won't have a constant height)
Path is OK with hundreds of CurvePoints. If you have 10.000, I'd say you could get problems.
can't imagine how a transform should be used here, maybe inside an Adorner.
your structure looks good. you will be able to implement all of this. I will suggest though how I would do it:
first of all use MVVM.
CurveEditor
ListBox(Panel=Canvas)(ItemsSource=Curves)(ItemTemplate=CurveControl)
CurveControl
Canvas(Background=Transparent) <= I'm not sure if standard is white, but you don't want to overlap other Curves...
CurveName
ListBox(Panel=Canvas(Background=Transparent))(ItemsSource=CurveParts)
ListBox(Panel=Canvas(Background=Transparent))(ItemsSource=CurvePoints)(ItemTemplate=>EditPointControl)
EditPointControl
Canvas
Thumb(Template = Ellipse) (Name=CenterHandle) (with some Visualstates for Selection and hiding of Tangents)
Thumb(Template = Ellipse) (Name=LeftHandle)
Thumb(Template = Ellipse) (Name=RightHandle)
Line (Binding X/Y to Centerpoint and LeftHandlePoint)
Line (Binding X/Y to Centerpoint and RightHandlePoint)
I have stated to set ItemTemplate for the ListBox. You can however style the listbox however you want (I think the standard style includes a border, you might want to remove that or set bordersize=0) and set instead of ItemTemplate the ItemContainerStyle and bind to IsSelected so you have control over IsSelected from your ViewModel (look here for what I mean).
So the viewmodel looks like this:
- CurveEditorViewModel
- ObservableCollection<CurveViewModel> Curves
- CurveViewModel
- string Label
- (Point LabelPlacement)
- bool IsSelected
- ObservableCollection<CurvePointViewModel> CurvePoints
- ObservableCollection<CurvePartViewModel> CurveParts
- CurvePointViewModel
- Point Position
- bool IsSelected
- Point LeftHandle
- Point RightHandle
- CurvePartViewModel
- CurvePointViewModel StartPoint
- CurvePointViewModel EndPoint
- Path CurvePath
in here you can subscribe to CurvePointViewModel's PropertyChanged and recalculate the Path you're exposing.
I'd probably improve on it as I go but that'd be my first guess.
There are some details you might want to watch out for. eg: the style for the thumbs might be a visible circle in the middle and an invisible bigger one around that with background=transparent. that way you can have your visible circle small, but have the user use the tumb in an area around the small circle.
EDIT:
here is an Example for the Thumb:
<Thumb Width="8" Height="8" Cursor="Hand" Margin="-4">
<Thumb.Template>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="Thumb">
<Grid>
<Ellipse Fill="Transparent" Margin="-6"/>
<Ellipse Stroke="Red" StrokeThickness="2"/>
</Grid>
</ControlTemplate>
</Thumb.Template>
</Thumb>
as you want to position this at a specific point on a canvas setting the Margin to minus half the width and height will place the center of the circle on that point. Furthermore, having that inner ellipse with a transparent fill and Margin of -6 you will get a 6px bigger radius around the inner (smaller) circle where you can drag the thumb.